setsneedtofeed

This is the best comment any drawing I've ever done has gotten.

I have a wishlist of Fallout remake/remaster ideas, but sadly I don't think any of them would ever be implimented.

Yippie kay yay, ~~Butthole~~ Mr. Falcon.

My own thing.

Some bombs, like the BLU-107 do exactly that.

Open your folder of shitposts and ...ugh... check for millipedes.

How terrible.

The practice became the standard for nomenclature starting in the 1920s, gradually replacing other conventions such as naming based on the year of adoption (M1911, M1919, and M1903 as examples). This led to a lot of M1s in WW2 due to the timing of the nomenclature change.

I find it interesting that the .30-06 caliber is named for year of adoption, with the name of the standard cartridge in WW2 being M1.

You still have to go through the ATF permitting process, this just strips out the arbitrary cost that was stuck in the original NFA.

Very neat. I've been on the fence about a suppressor for a PCC so this tips it.

If three people all have different terminal medical conditions, which are currently making their state of life excruciating, and will kill them shortly, and there is one healthy person who can be killed and their organs repurposed to restore quality of life and stop the medical condition to all of those people then utilitarianism says it is moral to do that.

Any answer saying that it is wrong to do that shows there must be a factor beyond need in the determination.

Politicians seem very good at misunderstanding things when it suits them.