this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2026
399 points (99.5% liked)

News

34313 readers
2479 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 101 points 3 days ago (5 children)

- Make car dependant infrastructure for every single city or town
- Refuse to innovate, build only "luxury" models
- ????
- Profit

[–] riskiedingo@lemmy.world 59 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Similarly with housing. Why make cheap starter homes when you can make so much more with “Luxury” homes and condos.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 46 points 3 days ago (2 children)

And yet use the same cheap materials in the "luxury" ones that you would have used in the cheap ones anyway!

[–] almost1337@lemmy.zip 30 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I follow some home inspectors who post videos from their new home inspections, and holy crap the things they find are ridiculous. Like, construction companies should lose their licenses bad.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I visit some partially built homes from time to time, and recently saw one just after it had been inspected. On one wall, on the insulation, the inspector had scrawled STUD? In red felt.

The stud was completely missing from the wall. It was just an empty frame filled with insulation. You’d think someone would have noticed earlier during construction, but obviously the actual contractor had just let the day labor go to town and never bothered to review their work before inspection.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 2 days ago

A lot of times, it's the contractor cutting corners and hoping no one notices.

[–] quoll@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 3 days ago

lol, that is 100% every australian apartment built in the last 15 years. the window frames are plastic and the cladding is combustible... but it's got Italian tiles and "European appliances" so it's an "executive suite". that will be $1.5million fuck you very much.

[–] worhui@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

It cost nearly the same to make a luxury unit as a stripped down one. Most of the cost is labor. Spend 5 k in fancier materials and get 50k for the unit.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Similar to literally every market that involves 'things', as we transition from failing liberal capitalism to horrifying technofascist neofeudalism (aka cyberpunk dystopia).

The next step is... well they won't lower the luxury prices, everything becomes renting, loaning, etc, even further and harder... untill you end up with bundled subscription plans / leases on a diverse array of physical things, as we currently have with bundles of online services.

We literally going to transition to a subscription based model for just being alive.

... unless enough people actually do something effrctive about it.

Other wise, the K shaped economy becomes a === shaped economy., you're either on top, or you're not, and you're basically treated as a kind of cattle.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 2 days ago

There's a difference between "cheap" and "inexpensive." Mcmansions are cheap.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

People wanted those mcmansions and rebuilds jack up prices. Now those massive suburban mcmansions are getting old in the tooth and no one wants to buy them. They are realizing they need to build smaller homes finally. We'll probably see more townhomes with shared structures (walls/roofs).

[–] hark@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Before they were building mcmansions and charging a fortune for them. Now they're building sardine cans and charging a fortune for them. Much better.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago (2 children)
  • Force you to rent an apartment
  • Refuse to build anything affordable, only "luxury" models
  • ???
  • Profit
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago
  • Capitalism
  • ???
  • Planetary Doom
[–] Guitarfun@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Don't forget the government cutting funding for affordable housing projects.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Amateur hour, my government funds 'affordable' housing projects that cost 300 grand and immediately turn into overpriced rentals.

[–] Guitarfun@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

At least housing is actually being built, but I know what you mean. Theres no real affordable housing near me and the wait list for what little is available has been closed due to budget cuts.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I recently read an article about "affordable" apartments being constructed an hour or so away. 900 SF, one br and bath, $2200, in a right to work, $7.25/hr minimum wage state.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

that sounds cheap to me. where i live a new 1bd/1bath will be closer to 3000-3500

crappy leaky roach filled basement apartments go for 2200

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What's minimum wage? These are "low income."

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

20 bucks an hour

minimum wage isn't low income. most people in low income housing make well above mimimum wage.

stop conflating these two things. also, just because you think it's too expensive doesn't mean it isn't. other people have different price thresholds than you. i know people making half what i make paying way more rent than I am, because that's what they've chose to do because they believe they 'need' to live very expensive places. plenty of people are willing to vastly overpay for 'new' housing, as it's an amenity. just like in my city you pay an extra $1000 to live near a subway stop and if you go 1km away, the rent is way cheaper. or that if you want pets the rent goes up $500+

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I live in a state where people do make minimum wage, or $8 send I told you what the situation is in my state. But go on and act like you know better than the one living here.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Sucks. Those people should probably get better jobs.

Nobody is coming to save anyone. We have to save ourselves.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 12 hours ago

You know how these people save themselves? Crimes of opportunity. So the next time someone you know has a window smashed in or their FedEx missing, gets mugged, car jacked/stripped or sold adulterated street drugs, remember this conversation.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Thanks to the invention of debt, we can continue taking from the poor what they don’t even have!

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

They do have it. It's the value they generate while working. That's what we've always taken, regardless of the exact financial tool used.

[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sorry I didn't get that, did you say you wanted an even larger pickup truck?

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Can you jack up the front so I can't see and put a bar on it so I can kill anyone I hit? Thanks.

[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We're way ahead of you! Our engineers have worked tirelessly to come up with an extra flat front that maximises impact with unsuspecting pedestrians

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Can I get it angled to ensure they're swept under? I don't want to risk them hitting my 1' of windshield

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)
  1. Cede sedans to Japanese car companies.
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago

Even they aren't selling them as much in the US any more. You don't really see many new Accords or Camrys any more, you see CR-Vs and Rav4s.