this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
1424 points (99.5% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

36615 readers
5390 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] b_tr3e@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It's a single installation, AFAIK - and definitely an art project. Having some academic arts background, I dare to say the focus of the installation is the difference between "in the middle" and "aside". So it's highly symbolic. Practically two chairs with a reasonable gap inbetween would be far more practical but they, of course, don't transmit any message.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But what this art says to me, as a wheelchair user, is something completely different because this design is the opposite of inclusive. Is that what is meant?

This design says I should be excluded – taking it as art, this design communicates everyone having conversations and leaving me out, because that back bar will exclude me by design.

If I’m to socialise, I should be on one end or the other, but that middle part means I’ll be artificially excluded by the environment.

Is that what it’s meant to mean?

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

What it's meant to mean is "yay us! We're doing inclusivity!"

What it actually means, to me, is "we will make a show of valuing disabled people, but we won't go so far as to actually include them in the design process, thereby making this bench an artifact to our own self congratulation, as well as making wheelchair users feel excluded in a far more insidious way than they already did".

And I feel like an asshole to say it like that, but it's so annoying to see well intentioned people fall at literally the first hurdle. Like, if they truly do see us as people who have intrinsic value that means we are worth including, then they also need to see us in our full personhood and include us in the process. The alternative is that their enthusiasm will just cause more money to be pissed down the drain on symbolic gestures that don't fulfill their intended purpose

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

I could see this meaning something more – and even something inclusive – if the environment is part of the design; for a moment I ignored the steep looking sand bank, but if that’s part of the art, that changes the meaning by a lot. That would make much more sense.

I’ve lived places where the landscape changes a lot throughout the year, though, so I sort of ignored the background and took the bench itself in isolation.

Maybe that’s where I fucked up.

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think that in this imaginary scenario, the art student is being graced with the benefit of the doubt, and it's assumed that they just have no clue how wheelchairs function in reality. I have a hard time assuming such malice if it is in fact an art project.

However, reality likes to make fools of optimists.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago

Ok but if you’re doing an art project about including chair users, maybe run your design by like, at least one chair user.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I didn’t assume malice, but ignorance. And not malicious ignorance, either.

Given this is a public installation, though, I was giving my interpretation.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago

At some point it really is. It’s not like it’s impossible to find a chair user to talk to about such things.