this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2026
945 points (97.3% liked)

Science Memes

18524 readers
1623 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 149 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)
[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 104 points 3 weeks ago (26 children)

Correct, it's called planet when it orbits arround the Sun AND has cleaned it's orbit from asteroids, not the case of Pluto, whose orbit is still full of other objects, some even bigger than Pluto itself.

If it orbits an Planet instead of the Sun, it's a Moon, even if it is bigger than some other planets.

[–] Klear@quokk.au 24 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

"All right, Ganymede. You can be a planet, but first you have to clean up your orbit. Start with Jupiter."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

when it orbits arround the Sun AND has cleaned it’s orbit from asteroid

Jupiter, largest of all dwarf planets, shares its orbit with some i don't know million asteroids.

[–] ContriteErudite@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I've often thought that 'clearing' it's orbit is misleading. I believe the definition ought to be changed to 'controls' or 'governs' its orbit. This allows for objects in stable L4/L5 locations without inviting the caveats that 'clearing' needs.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 weeks ago

Its because its a colloquial phrase that more or less the media picked up and ran with.

Actual astronomers and astrophysicists use math to describe what they're talking about, math that you can find and learn fairly easily on wikipedia.

Lay people tend to just evaluate a phrase for its extremely literal meaning, not realizing that it is at best just pop science jargon, short hand to refer to a pretty well defined and precise concept, that is difficult to summarize without losing specificity.

There are many, many other examples of this kind of thing happening with other phrases or terms used to refer to complex concepts.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago

If those asteroids are on the L1-5 points, they do not count. Since they will stay at that orbit forever.

(pragmatically speaking)

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Jupiter has a permanent cloud of asteroids that follow it and neptune crosses the orbit of pluto so neither of those have cleared their orbits so of course they made exceptions so that their contrived definition fits.

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 40 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (18 children)

Do you mean the asteroids at the Lagrangian points? Every single planet has asteroids there because math/physics dictates those points to be stable. Jupiter has the most at its points because it's the largest planet.

Same with Neptune cleaning its orbit: It has collided with every single thing in its orbit EXCEPT those that synced their orbits to Neptune. An object that is gravitationally dominated by a single planet should not be a planet under any definition.

Sources because I had to read into your claims and I'm no astrophysicist:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange_point

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resonant_trans-Neptunian_object

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (10 children)

Jupiter's Trojan asteroids sit at Lagrange points. Material found there is not counted in the 'clearing the orbit' criteria. They are in stable orbits caused by the mass of the planet in question, not in lieu of a massive enough body.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] CatAssTrophy@safest.space 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

However, if a moon is sufficiently large compared to its planet, it also gets to be a planet and part of a binary planet system, not a moon.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

Aka the Charon-Pluto binary dwarf planet system

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] wizzor@sopuli.xyz 22 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Wasn't it more bc it doesn't clear it's surroundings?

[–] accideath@feddit.org 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

And it has an orbit at a different angle than the 8 Planets and at it’s narrowest the ellipse of Plutos orbit is actually closer to the Sun than ~~Uranus~~ Neptune.

Edit: That moment when you‘re so done, you fuck up the order of our planets…

[–] Morphit@feddit.uk 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Do you mean Neptune? Pluto's perihelion is 29.7 AU while Uranus' aphelion is 20.1 AU.

[–] accideath@feddit.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

Oh yea, sorry. I was tired, exhausted n stoned n fucked up the correct order of our planets

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

They did our boy dirty. Never forget!

[–] itsmistermoon@piefed.social 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's what I tell my wife but she won't listen

Come on guys, laugh

[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

We’re laughing with your wife.

[–] itsmistermoon@piefed.social 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 9 points 3 weeks ago

Oh honey it’s ok

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago

That’s not what she said.

load more comments (1 replies)