this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2025
520 points (98.5% liked)

Mildly Interesting

24429 readers
246 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 174 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

"illicit drug use such as marijuanja and cocaine"

Yeah just throw those two together into the same question! That makes sense!

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 81 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s still wild seeing billboards for weed, even though there’s people still in jail for selling it. :/

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

In 1988 the public perception was that they were equally bad. There were people who tried to claim that marijuana was harmless, but they were "crazy pothead druggies".

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 24 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The line my shitty parents would always give was "all the people we know who do a lot of marijuana are burn outs and don't go anywhere in life" to which my internal mental response has evolved into "CORRECTION all the people you know who are stupid enough to let your judgemental-ass know they smoke marijuana you mean".

Some of my parents best friends regularly smoked marijuana when I was growing up and neither me nor my parents knew because those adults knew how childlike and intellectually unserious my parents' judgements were around drug use.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, the zeitgeist of 1998 was... different. D.A.R.E. really did a number on folks.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Loitering, littering, and mass murder will be on the rise.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The use of stimulants was more accepted back then, with ephedrine routinely sold as a diet aid. I wouldn't be surprised that people judged cocaine less harsh because of that.

Also a lot of people used cocaine.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yeah but even if things were like that this question is still like asking "Do you participate in recreational activities such as snuggling up with a blanket and reading or bungee jumping?".

The two drugs just don't have much to do with each other, they are done in completely different social environments with totally different intentions.

I mean I am sure most people who do cocaine also are willing to smoke weed but that is more of a "why not?" thing than there being any logical connection at all between the two drugs (if you are willing to break societal norms and do coke, you are also probably willing to break societal norms less and do marijuana).

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 7 points 3 weeks ago

They don't have much to do with each other, but it is more the public perception of the risk of both drugs.

[–] msage@programming.dev 3 points 3 weeks ago

Like white folk weren't on coke since forever

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean I throw them together in the same bowl

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Around here we call that "Putting sugar on your Weedies."