this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2025
658 points (98.1% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

36233 readers
3141 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 127 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

We CAN sustain everybody we have now. It's just billionaires have decided it's more profitable to let a huge section of society suffer. The more suffering for us, the more profit for them. But you have to balance it, so it doesn't lead to revolt.

Thats what ends suffering. Not decreased birthrates, but instead death and revolt of those holding back food and shelter from those that need it, so they can raise prices on unsold units.

[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

We could feed everyone now, but not sustainably. To produce the amount of food we do now, we need fertilizers made from limited resources like oil and pesticides/fungicides that destroy the ecosystem. If the current agriculture section of the world completely moved to sustainable practices next year there wouldn't be enough food to support half of the human population.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Not so sure, we are pulling resources out of the earth at a ridiculous rate. Even with green energy we are still reliant on mining for everything. Goods, fertilizer, the stuff for solar panels. We're going to run out of easy to access stuff sooner or later.

[–] sunstoned@lemmus.org 2 points 6 hours ago

So you're saying mine the moon?

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 10 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Degrowth is only an option after the dismantling Capitalism. We are pulling unreasonable and unsustainable amounts of resources from the earth. This should be ended but that cannot be done while those resources are owned by capitalists who must by the nature of capitalism expand that extraction infinitely. If we want sustainability through the reduction of wasteful and unnecessary use of resources we need a system that is not predicated on infinite growth in a finite system. We can sustain ourselves and the environment, just not like this.

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip -2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

We can sustain everybody on Earth right now if we all eat beans and rice, give up all meat, stop plane travel, and limit your commutes to ones you can do without a personal car. Even if we get rid of billionaires, the rest of western life is unsustainable at this population.

If you are reading this message on a smart phone, it's already too late, you don't meet this criteria. The only solution for us to sustain your lifestyle is to reduce the population.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 5 points 9 hours ago

That's all hard to do when billionaires are the ones structuring society. The point is we don't get to choose corrective societal actions unless it is an exercise of individual privilege. I would have loved to take the train to visit relatives, but it literally is not an option.

[–] BorgDrone@feddit.nl -1 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

We CAN sustain everybody we have now.

Even if we could (which I doubt) is it even worth it living on a planet that’s this crowded?

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago

Yes? Have you ever been to Tokyo, Shanghai, any of the like 100 cities >10m in China?

They're quite nice.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

That depends where you live. I wouldn't want to live in India, which is crowded as hell. But Half of Canada is basically empty. Half of Australia is basically empty. Some of the states in the USA are basically empty. The majority of russia is empty.

Space isn't the issue.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Those places are empty because it is not easy to live there. And we should leave those places alone anyway.

[–] caurvo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 hours ago

Australia and Canada are most uninhabited because there's a lot of uninhabitable land. I do agree that a lot of land use isn't efficient, but there is also generally a reason people don't live in central Australia.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 4 points 12 hours ago

The world really is not all that crowded, it only feels that way because our land use is inefficient

[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 12 hours ago

More scientists and inventors, more philosophers and artists, more people that share your niche hobby...
The only people who have a problem with that, are hipsters or just like dieing a preventable death.