Blue-ringed octopuses, comprising the genus Hapalochlaena, are four extremely venomous species of octopus that are found in tide pools and coral reefs in the Pacific and Indian Oceans, from Japan to Australia. They can be identified by their yellowish skin and characteristic blue and black rings that can change color dramatically when the animals are threatened. They eat small crustaceans, including crabs, hermit crabs, shrimp, and other small sea animals.
They are some of the world's most venomous marine animals. Despite their small size—12 to 20 cm (5 to 8 in)—and relatively docile nature, they are very dangerous if provoked when handled because their venom contains a powerful neurotoxin called tetrodotoxin.
The species tends to have a lifespan around two to three years, which may vary depending on factors such as nutrition, temperature, and the intensity of light within its environment.
Behavior
Blue-ringed octopuses spend most of their time hiding in crevices while displaying effective camouflage patterns with their dermal chromatophore cells. Like all octopuses, they can change shape easily, which allows them to squeeze into small crevices. This, along with piling up rocks outside the entrance to their lairs, helps safeguard them from predators.
If they are provoked, they quickly change color, becoming bright yellow with each of the 50–60 rings flashing bright iridescent blue within a third of a second, as an aposematic warning display. In the greater blue-ringed octopus (H. lunulata), the rings contain multilayer light reflectors called iridophores. These are arranged to reflect blue–green light in a wide viewing direction. Beneath and around each ring are dark-pigmented chromatophores that can be expanded within one second to enhance the contrast of the rings. No chromatophores are above the ring, which is unusual for cephalopods, as they typically use chromatophores to cover or spectrally modify iridescence. The fast flashes of the blue rings are achieved using muscles that are under neural control. Under normal circumstances, each ring is hidden by contraction of muscles above the iridophores. When these relax and muscles outside the ring contract, the iridescence is exposed, thereby revealing the blue color.
Toxicity
The blue-ringed octopus, despite its small size, carries enough venom to kill 26 adult humans within minutes. Their bites are tiny and often painless, with many victims not realizing they have been envenomated until respiratory depression and paralysis begins. No blue-ringed octopus antivenom is available
The octopus produces venom containing tetrodotoxin, histamine, tryptamine, octopamine, taurine, acetylcholine, and dopamine. The venom can result in nausea, respiratory arrest, heart failure, severe and sometimes total paralysis, and blindness, and can lead to death within minutes if not treated. Death is usually caused by suffocation due to paralysis of the diaphragm.
Direct contact is necessary to be envenomated. Faced with danger, the octopus's first instinct is to flee. If the threat persists, the octopus goes into a defensive stance, and displays its blue rings. If the octopus is cornered and touched, it may bite and envenomate its attacker.
Conservation
Currently, the blue-ringed octopus population information is listed as least concern according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature. Threats such as bioprospecting, habitat fragmentation, degradation, overfishing, and human disturbance, as well as species collections for aquarium trade, though, may be threats to population numbers. Hapalochlaena possibly contributes to a variety of advantages to marine conservation. This genus of octopus provides stability of habitat biodiversity, as well as expanding the balance of marine food webs.
- 🐻Link to all Hexbear comms https://hexbear.net/post/1403966
- 📀 Come listen to music and Watch movies with your fellow Hexbears nerd, in Cy.tube](https://live.hexbear.net/c/movies
- 🔥 Read and talk about a current topics in the News Megathread https://hexbear.net/post/6697187
- ⚔ Come talk in the New Weekly PoC thread https://hexbear.net/post/6693847
- 🏳️⚧️ Talk with fellow Trans comrades in the New Weekly Trans thread https://hexbear.net/post/6764309
- 👊 New Weekly Improvement thread https://hexbear.net/post/6759650
- 🧡 Disabled comm megathread https://hexbear.net/post/6761973
- ☕ Parenting Chat https://hexbear.net/post/6829658
- 🐉 Anime & Manga discussion thread https://hexbear.net/post/6618110
reminders:
- 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
- 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
- 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
- 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog
Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):
Aid:
Theory:
The paradox of evil has an easy solution.
Why does God allow evil to proliferate when they are omnipotent and omniscient?
Simple. If God existed, humans wouldn't even be like microbes compared to it. Do humans bother micromanaging* the lives of microbes to prevent evil (by the cultural* standards of the microbes)?
I know this "solution" to the problem basically side steps religion entirely and presents "God" as a hypothetical eldritch entity rather than the "benevolent patriarch" character of abrahamic religions. But it is food for thought.
*unexpected pun!
It's a big problem in Islam too (so not just western religions) and your solution dosn't really work if God is also supposed to be omnipresent and justice itself. Also, with perfect foresight, gods creation should be perfect and free from evil without requiring any micromanaging.
In fact, god is supposed to be simple and unchanging in all abrahamic religions, so they wouldn't be able to become bored or become anything else, as they just exist or rather are existence itself without any attributes separate from their essence. Eg God is not just, God is justice and nothing else. So justice (= God) is also identical with goodness, beauty, truth, oneness, existence, etc. I'm not kidding, that's literally dogma in Catholicism, almost all other Christian sects and most Islamic schools. People are ordered to believe that. God can't change because all their potentiallity is already actualized or they would have two parts (actual and potential) and fail to be perfectly simple.
One proposed solution that came up multiple times in history is to deny the existence of evil by saying what we perceive as evil is just non-existence or diluted existence, as all existence is good. In this view, creation is necessarily spreading out from God "radially" like light (illuminationism) decreasing in density as it spreads outward and leaving spaces of "evil" non-existence. So even really evil things are good so far as they exist, just less good than actually good things. I know it sounds crazy, but that's serious and really old theology which is still being discussed. It also has interesting philosophical implications.
Tldr: Basically what I'm trying to say is that the official canon version of God is already way more abstract and unfathomable than any monster that Lovecraft dreamt up.
The paradox of evil is also just a very euro-centric thing based on non-pagan interpretations of god. As with any idealist paradox there are contradictory answers based on whichever perspective the speaker has.
God allows evil to proliferate to punish humans for making the wrong choice is just as valid as God is a collection of gases and doesn't have any impetus in creating anything based on belief.
of course it's eurocentric, it's a problem for the euros because of the theological corner they backed themselves into.
you don't have to try to apply it to other cultures because they weren't worried about that shit and it would be absurd for the christians to even consider other theologies at the time and place.
You don't think omnibelevolence was an early Christian doctrine?
i think worrying about the tri-omni thing is a problem theologians made for themselves later on. maybe some heretic sects addressed it but they generally got murdered for being the wrong kind of christian.
Well Gnostics did square some things away by saying God isn't the true God and the true God exists outside the universe. But I think that even Paul wrestles with some of the questions of what it means for God to be omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibelevolent, much before Romans or later Europeans were elaborating more stuff.
I think the paradox can still exist for certain pagan religions. All it requires is the existence of an entity that is highly capable of managing humans and expected to be benevolent.
I also just realized this. But the paradox of evil applies very well to capitalist governments. The same arguments even apply, as well as the standard defense of rightists that capitalist government allow heinous shit to happen because "freedom".
I really like the Pachamama mythology of the Andean indigenous tribes since she can both be loving and sheltering but also cruel and destructive when she's hurt. Since she's tied to the mother nature and cosmos she exists wholly with everything and everything exists with her.
In a lot of ways it's a very proto-materialist reading of the world, where everything is related to each other.