this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
122 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14323 readers
470 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UmbraVivi@hexbear.net 25 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

What is the benefit of this? Lowering the risk of a military coup?

[–] huf@hexbear.net 29 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

possibly? or at least it may be a way to prevent any of them from capturing the leadership (like the praetorian guard would often).

or it may just be somehow the nature of fascism. i dunno.

come to think of it, did all fascist countries do this? did mussolini? did franco? did south korea? japan? so maybe it's got nothing to do with fascism.

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 25 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Mussolini did it with the blackshirts and the army, Japan had an absurd level of rivalry between the army and the navy. Franco, on the other hand, pretty successfully integrated together the army and various feuding militias. Maybe that's why he managed to win, unlike most other fascists.

[–] huf@hexbear.net 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

well, he also didnt start a war with the entire world, unlike the others. he wanted spain, and when he got it, he sat on it. franco knew when to quit.

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 11 points 5 months ago

He negotiated with Germany about joining WWII, but didn't like their conditions.

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 10 points 5 months ago

Japan had an absurd level of rivalry between the army and the navy

Didn't they lose some critical battle specifically because they weren't sharing intelligence or something like that