this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
77 points (97.5% liked)

SneerClub

1191 readers
153 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

See our twin at Reddit

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

invertebrateinvert

amazing how much shittier it is to be in the rat community now that the racists won. before at least they were kinda coy about it and pretended to still have remotely good values instead of it all being yarvinslop.

invertebrateinvert

it would be nice to be able to ever invite rat friends to anything but half the time when I've done this in the last year they try selling people they just met on scientific racism!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dgerard@awful.systems 22 points 1 day ago (4 children)

source: a reblog of the original

first time i spoke to a rationalist about the AI doom thing in 2010, he tried to sell me on scientific racism

yudkowsky was making posts literally of race scientist talking points in 2007

[–] YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems 11 points 22 hours ago

I feel like this is going to be a pretty common cope line for rationalists that face an increasing social cost for associating with a technofascist AI cult. I'm sure some of that is legitimate, in that there's been a kind of dead sea effect as people who aren't okay with eugenics stop hanging out in rationalist spaces, making the space as a whole more openly racist. But in terms of the thought leaders and the "movement" as a whole, I can't think of any high-profile respected rat figures who pushed back against the racists and lost. All the pushback and call-outs came from outside the ratsphere. In as much as the racists "won" it was a fight that never actually happened.

[–] CinnasVerses@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even Ozy talked about someone converting zir to eugenics around the time that zi was moving from feminist blogging to LessWrong (although zi no longer endorsed eugenics two years later) https://web.archive.org/web/20141127052857/http://thingofthings.wordpress.com/2014/10/31/an-argument-against-eugenics-that-doesnt-involve-calling-anyone-a-nazi/

I read that as Ozzy for a second and got really confused.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Scientific racism doesn't exist.

Racism is unscientific, it is purely emotional and not based on reality or statistics if you dig deep enough.

You can call it scientific-sounding racism though.

[–] JFranek@awful.systems 2 points 13 hours ago

I call it: "scientific" racism. To me that gets the point across the best.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The point is that you are still calling it out as racism, a term racists very much don't like. Meaning, the "racism" is the important part in "scientific racism", because it unequivocally tells us that the science in question is shit.

The actual euphemism for sciency racism is human biodiversity studies.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 14 points 1 day ago

I mean yes you are right but “scientific racism” and “race science” etc. are real phrases that are useful to describe and discuss particular racist ideas.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly that just seems to imply the concept of legitimate scientific racism even more.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 8 points 1 day ago

Numberwang racism