this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
73 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14115 readers
661 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

the Iranian military attacked a crowd of protesters, killing ~88 and injuring between 205-8,000. The violence increased the unrest, leading to a general strike and the Shah fleeing the country in January 1979.

The massacre, known as Black Friday, began when thousands of protesters gathered in Tehran's Jaleh Square for a religious demonstration, unaware that the government had declared martial law a day earlier due to widespread political unrest.

Some sources estimate that 4,000 people were shot down by tanks, guns, and military helicopters. The deaths were described as the pivotal event in the Iranian Revolution that ended any "hope for compromise" between the protest movement and regime of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.

The massacre led to widespread protests, and a general strike in October shut down the petroleum industry that was essential to the administration's survival. The Shah fled Iran in January 1979, clearing the way for the Iranian Revolution, led by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.

Black Friday: The Massacre That Ignited a Revolution in Iran

reminders:

  • πŸ’š You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • πŸ’™ Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • πŸ’œ Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🐢 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think it's probably a case of someone who is really uncomfortable navigating a sense of sexuality that is different from the already very warped and exploitative one he grew up with. Capital absorbing and coopting feminism took on the idea of sexual freedom and made it the freedom to sell women's bodies with the veneer of empowerment (much like how free exchange of goods and services makes capital free but takes away individuals' freedom). The free availability of sexual gratification probably feels really weird to someone who sees the world with a more 1960s lens, where it's more about territorialization and exclusive domination.

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I agree and think everything I said still totally stands.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Cool. I guess I didn't make certain things as clear as I thought that you did. The fact they cant accept this veneer of empowerment and just enjoy hot ladies speaks to a deep and cruel darkness. It's some Blue Velvet kinda shit where its no good unless they know a woman is being harmed. They disguise it as being old timey and trad but in the end, that's what it is.