this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
104 points (98.1% liked)
Fuck AI
4832 readers
1151 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
See Quantum computing.
Once governments started to set aside funding for it, the scams began. Google, Microsoft, they're all in on it
DWave is history, an AI example Builder was revealed to be 700 underpaid Indians.
There's like two useful algorithms right now. That we also can't use because we cannot make matrices of qubits that are stable.
Once the money and hype train starts rolling, it becomes about money men exploiting that hype to multiply their money.. and the technology is completey secondary.
Eh, I'll agree that quantum computing hasn't delivered much yet, but it shouldn't be mentioned in the same sentence as LLMs. There's a difference between tech that hasn't become practical yet, and tech that is a gigantic grift pretending to be something it will categorically never achieve.
And why do you think quantum computing isn't the latter one?
Because I think it has a stronger theoretical basis. We have been able to do simple operations with qubits and have been increasing those capabilities over the decades. It's basically a matter of scale at this point.
No, it really isn't.
We have almost no useful algorithms and there's no algorithms in sight.
And many of the ones that have been assumed to be useful, aren't.
It's a gigantic shell game right now.
cracking cryptographic algorithms is a usecase that is useful to governments. the usefulness of a tool doesn't care if it's good for everyone, just that there are benefits to those that use it.
I'm pretty sure you're wrong on this.