this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
99 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13949 readers
711 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net
MiraculousMM@hexbear.net
Nakoichi@hexbear.net
corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net
sweet_pecan@hexbear.net
a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net
khizuo@hexbear.net
gaystyleJoker@hexbear.net
thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net
context@hexbear.net
Infamousblt@hexbear.net
Sulvy@hexbear.net
99
Another Nate Plastic L (hexbear.net)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by FuckyWucky@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://xcancel.com/nkulw/status/1937127773400662144

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Thordros@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago

And he was only slightly less wrong than other pollsters in 2016. He was predicting something like a 75% chance of a Clinton win, while everybody else had her in the 90% range.