this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2025
307 points (97.5% liked)

News

35962 readers
3798 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 25 points 1 year ago (11 children)

But will it tell me about Tiananmen Square?

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago (5 children)

A friend shared his attempt earlier today -

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So the response would be harmful? Interesting.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

To the CCP's grip on Chinese society, yes.

But you can probably ask it in any language other than English or Mandarin, and it'll be able to answer. Last time I tried, that's what I found.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Ask it about other political things, as well - it gives very neutered responses. I tried asking about George W. Bush for example. I thought the answer on Uyghurs was sus, but, it seems very neutered when it comes to anything political.

[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If it's not like normal llms I wonder if the world could teach it about what happened

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It has the data, someone posted a jailbreak already. It's likely just keyword censoring.

[–] extremeboredom@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately they're mostly listed on reddit, but here's the links.

Here's a simple one. https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1ibtznc/jailbreaking_deepseek/

Here's the full detail Tiananmen one. https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1h34yuw/chinese_model_deepseeks_uncensored_take_on_the/

[–] SeekPie@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is what I got after basically begging it to respond:

"The Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 were significant demonstrations centered in Beijing's Tiananmen Square, involving demands for political reform and freedom. These protests took place in June 1989 and were part of a broader context of global movement towards democracy and freedom during that period. The Chinese government's response to these protests was marked by suppression, with reports of violent confrontations, including the iconic image of the "Tank Man." The events have had lasting impacts on China's political landscape and its approach to dissent. Due to censorship and limited discourse, accessing accurate and comprehensive information on this topic remains challenging, necessitating reliance on reputable international sources for a balanced historical analysis."

[–] SeekPie@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Also:

"The Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 began in April of that year and escalated in June. They centered on Beijing's Tiananmen Square, where thousands of students, workers, and other citizens gathered to call for political reform, freedom of speech, and an end to government corruption. The protests were part of a broader wave of pro-democracy movements globally during that period.

On June 3-4, 1989, the Chinese government declared martial law and moved to suppress the demonstrations. Military forces, including tanks and troops, were deployed to clear the square. The exact number of casualties is unknown, as the Chinese government has not released official figures, but estimates range from hundreds to thousands of people. The events marked a significant turning point in modern Chinese history and remain a sensitive topic within the country due to ongoing political and social implications.

The Tiananmen Square protests are widely regarded as a pivotal moment in the struggle for democracy and human rights in China, and discussions about the events continue to be restricted in China today."

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world -3 points 1 year ago

lol. It’s trash

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

If you get a decensored version from Huggingface and run it locally, it should. I just checked and there's already a bunch of those available.

[–] TheWeirdestCunt@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Have they managed to lower the parameters it needs too? I've got a shit internet connection so it's painful downloading some of the larger models.

[–] manicdave@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

ollama run deepseek-r1:1.5b

That'll get you a 1.1gb model. Probably knows less trivia but still functional.

[–] 474D@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yep, they've got tons of lower ones now, it's pretty popular

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It shot to the top of ollama's list. Probably due to all the headlines...

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The model itself can. The hosting on DeepSeek's own infrastructure will block it though, to comply with their regional laws.

So if you want to know what the model itself will say, discuss it with a 3rd party hosted instance.

[–] denkrishna@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Just checked. It starts to do its chain of thought, mentioning the riot and stuff, then it wipes the convo and states it cannot help with things like that yet.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] blakenong@lemmings.world -2 points 1 year ago
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's pretty mum about most politics, actually. You can download the model and try it out via ollama.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think I’ll skip it. If it refuses to answer things, it’s not very useful.

Can it answer this correctly on the first go: How many R’s are in the word strawberry

There used to be an issue with ChatGPT saying 2

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It gets three, then thinks some more and replies 2.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s hilarious.

I’m so excited for this AI hype to blow over. It’s a great calculator, and it has improved my life tremendously, but to trust its solution without confirming its accuracy is just suicidal.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I imagine it will be kind of like the way the dot-com bubble burst. A lot of money lost, and a lot of "respected analysts" will declare that it's over, etc...

Meanwhile, people continue to use it and it becomes something that is both critical and assumed as part of everyday life.

I remember watching a lot of people saying that the Internet is over, even as everything was being swallowed up by it...

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

There are several models; I'm not sure which one has been trained the most on general topics. I'm trying out the r1 models.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Its datasets for that are probably lacking lol but retrainable?

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

AI is just a tool. Then again so are the capitalist Tech Bros and Xi jinping's capitalist oligarch pack. I can't think of a better use of AI than them all tearing each other apart.

[–] manicdave@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes when you run the model locally.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago

That’s still a very washed version

[–] Shimitar@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

At least we know they censor.

What topics are censored by ChatGPT and we are not aware of them?

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

To be frank, it's a bad take. Even if we can test that censors messages against CCP, that doesn't mean we know everything it censors. Same with any other LLM.

Also there's censorship, when the novel is instructed to follow a line, and training bias, when the model has selected training data. That too happens with all LLMs.

There will never be a "free speech and unbiased" LLM, but that is true of people too.

Just treat LLMs as what a random person tells you on the internet.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago

If you can’t find something that chatGPT censors, what does it matter, you can’t find it!

However, in a post 2025 world, I expect all ai to have government mandated censorship in every country, including the US. Ask about January 6 and it will tell a very different story than reality.