this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2025
1171 points (97.7% liked)

People Twitter

6132 readers
986 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 132 points 2 months ago (4 children)

feminism is for everyone. patriarchy is both against and enforced by everyone

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 69 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

When i was a kid it was the opposite... but in my adult years it's been overwhelmingly women that tried to enforce masculinity on me any time I stepped out of the bounds of masculinity and did something feminine (wear feminine clothes, cry, make a comment getting hit on by men to name a few). I was a closeted trans woman in denial which made it extra annoying whenever it happened. Now that I'm out the women in my life have been extremely supportive so there is that. However whenever I go out in full femme with outfit and make-up I noticed it's women who stare at me, had one lady look me up and down three times pretty deliberately while standing 4ft away from me. I don't always see it as malicious (not that i would care), more like they're curious or maybe even liking fit. But it's an interesting contrast compared to men who seem to give me almost no mind or attention by comparison. It was something I didn't expect.

[–] Sc00ter@lemm.ee 74 points 2 months ago (5 children)

My wife makes way more than me, with the potential to be sole provider in less than 5 years. I told her id love to stay home and take care of the house/kids. She got offended, and said itd probably end our marriage because that wouldnt be masculine.

Shes always been a big proponent for gender equality... i guess she always only ever thought of one gender

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Take precautions. Seriously. Economic abuse is just as if not even more common than physical abuse. And you already know she's got emotional abuse locked and loaded.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 26 points 2 months ago

Man your wife is fucked up. I'd love to give the husband an ejection seat for the rat race

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 months ago

lolwut y she so going so 1950s on you

Taking care of the kids is a masculine thing to do! 💪

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Funny how that works, right? Both my mom and my ex, super feminists, all down with the gays and progressive but were some of the worst people when it came to enforcing my masculinity. My mom is coming around now after putting my foot down pretty sternly more than a few times. But when I was closeted that shit was really fucking hurtful and kept me from expressing myself.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 6 points 2 months ago

Start wearing a frilly pink apron around the house. Gotta have some fun while you can

But also yeah, good luck with the divorce 😶‍🌫️

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes, and many women are strict enforcers of the patriarchy, too. Boys are raised to deny their feelings by both parents, because both parents were raised that way, too. There’s a focus on hyper masculinity that hurts both men and women, and is perpetuated by both men and women. Society has been leaning away from that, but it’s caused a backlash that’s kinda hurting us right now. And some social media is amplifying it.

We’ll get past it, but it’s going to hurt for a while.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Eh, this is all stuff that was written up in the 70s and 80s, it's gonna take a while before anyone even attempts to do anything about it.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Yes, it was written up back then. Which is a large reason why many more GenZers were raised without those toxic values, because their GenX parents actually read that shit.

So this upcoming generation are being called woke pussies for being raised with empathy and against the historical gender norms, and that’s causing the normal pendulum of conservative panic to swing society in the other direction right now.

If you’ve watched history happen and really read about it critically, this is all very predictable.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You or @Ofiuco@lemmy.cafe in somewhere like the SF Bay Area, California?

Curious cuz this ain’t cool and I dare say my circles ‘round these decently progressive parts would concur

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 months ago

Wait you know people here who have genuine opinions they share and aren't just being performative?

[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think the ideology you think of when you say it's for everyone, is egalitarianism. Feminism can't be for everyone in the same way that patriarchy can't mean "womens oppression of men".

Unless of course, you're looking to confuse with the terminology.

[–] tja@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Feminism is a range of socio-political movements and ideologies that aim to define and establish the political, economic, personal, and social equality of the sexes.

[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

The word literally derives from feminine

feminine adjective (WOMEN) Showing qualities that people generally think are typical of women

There is an opposite term to feminism, masculinism, which then leads to the idea that it can't be completely equal. But i assume people will keep using the term to mean "equal rights for all", since thats usually how it goes with languages.

I just worry that the implication is changing so that women = equality and men = inequality. That train of thought is mainly what drives younger men to go off the wall with their chauvinistic tendencies.

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

But that is not how it ends up working. There are very little places to talk about men's issues. It either turns in some incel shit or reddits menslib.

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Tell me where in feminism are men's issues dealt with? They aren't, because feminism is about acheiving equality of the sexes for women. It is about advancing women and there's nothing wrong with that.

Feminism doesn't address men's issues. It never has and never will because that's not the purpose of the movement.

Beating people over the head with this out of context "social equality of the sexes" is only going to drive men to declare they aren't feminists because feminism does not and never will address mens issues.

If you feel that claim is unwarranted please point out a single men's issue that has been addressed by feminism because the Wikipedia article certainly doesn't include any examples.

[–] Impassionata@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Feminism is not and cannot be for everyone.

Only an idiot would believe that masculine rights groups would primarily exist to serve the issues of women.

Why should anyone believe that feminism can solve the issues of men?

Don't make feminism, a very good thing, into an all-encompassing ideology. You set yourself up for disappointment when not everyone rallies to your idealistic crusade.

Feminism is a tool of thought for liberating women. If you're trying to use it to liberate men, you've got a self-serving ideology at work and it sucks to deal with.

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Thou I'd love to hear your thoughts on veganism. Suffice it to say you're wrong this time champ.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 11 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Feminism is explicitly about the social equality of sexes.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Actions speak louder than words, and despite all the No True Scotsman-ing, many, many words and acts of sexism against males has occurred under the banner of feminism.

I've read public press releases from mainstream feminist organizations like NOW proclaiming that the only reasons a father would ever seek custody of his child in a divorce is because he's either a wifebeater who wants to retain access to the woman he's abusing, or he's a deadbeat who's just trying to get out of paying child support.

There is a reason that the vast majority of people believe in equal treatment for both sexes, but only a small minority self-identify as "feminist".

[–] psud@aussie.zone 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Many feminists would not agree with you.

I prefer talking about equality when talking about equality.

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Just because one claims that their own views align with feminism, doesn’t mean that it is, by definition- feminism. By this, I aim to mean that there will always be bad apples in any group of people.

So how about maybe not judging the whole of a thing on those that claim to align with it- yet show no similarities to it.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So how about maybe not judging the whole of a thing on those that claim to align with it- yet show no similarities to it.

Maybe if the people who are pro-equality shouldn't grasp onto their gendered term so hard. Kinda weird that out of one side of their mouths so many people will say it's about equality for all but insist we must use the feminine term over the genderless one we already have

Don't want to be judged on gender lines? Don't use gendered terms to describe yourself, simple

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Again, you’re judging the entirety of a thing based on a portion of a thing. This is the same thing as when people call all vegans “obnoxious” when it’s just a portion of them that act this way.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I won't get into the rest of the stuff in this thread, but I'll disagree with your first point.

Feminism is a word. An English word. And that means it's definition is driven by common usage not a book. If the common usage shifts to a toxic place, the meaning shifts with it.

If you disagree I'd love to hear your gymnastics around the word invcel, it's evolution into incel, and then that further extension to femcel (even though the person who coined invcel was a woman).

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Feminism has a static definition. And because of this fact- I disagree wholeheartedly with the entirety of your response.

This is not gymnastics. This is empirical truth. And I’m not getting locked up in attempts to define any whatabout attempts to derail the topic.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

There is no such thing as a static definition. You're gonna have a real bad time in life communicating with people if you try to make that be your thing.

However since my whole message was about flexibility of definitions and you called my example whataboutism...I'm thinking you already have challenges communicating with people.

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I am not going to get distracted arguing about things like the semantics of definitions. The purpose of anyone doing this is almost always to disrupt the discussion and derail the topic.

Feminism is what it is defined as, which is a socio-political movement and a set of ideas that advocate for equal rights and freedoms for all genders.

Your attempt to whatabout using incels as an example to compare the evolution of a word to prove that feminism has a different meaning is just bad faith nonsense. It’s a false equivalency, and it didn’t work.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Many feminists would not agree with you.

Really? Who? Give me some names and citations.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Read the rest of the comments, there's a few good examples.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So, people who aren't notable feminists and who could be trolls or bots? Gee, thanks, those sound like great sources.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm commenting on an interesting post. The same reason why everybody else is here. Why do you ask?

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Mingling with the bots and trolls?

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

In theory, yes. In practice, not always.

[–] Impassionata@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago

Sometimes it even meets that aspiration!