this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2025
1181 points (97.7% liked)
People Twitter
8527 readers
1726 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Feminism is not and cannot be for everyone.
Only an idiot would believe that masculine rights groups would primarily exist to serve the issues of women.
Why should anyone believe that feminism can solve the issues of men?
Don't make feminism, a very good thing, into an all-encompassing ideology. You set yourself up for disappointment when not everyone rallies to your idealistic crusade.
Feminism is a tool of thought for liberating women. If you're trying to use it to liberate men, you've got a self-serving ideology at work and it sucks to deal with.
Thou I'd love to hear your thoughts on veganism. Suffice it to say you're wrong this time champ.
Feminism is explicitly about the social equality of sexes.
Actions speak louder than words, and despite all the No True Scotsman-ing, many, many words and acts of sexism against males have occurred under the banner of feminism.
I've read public press releases from mainstream feminist organizations like NOW proclaiming that the only reasons a father would ever seek custody of his child in a divorce is because he's either a wifebeater who wants to retain access to the woman he's abusing, or he's a deadbeat who's just trying to get out of paying child support.
There is a reason that the vast majority of people believe in equal treatment for both sexes, but only a small minority self-identify as "feminist".
Many feminists would not agree with you.
I prefer talking about equality when talking about equality.
Maybe if the people who are pro-equality shouldn't grasp onto their gendered term so hard. Kinda weird that out of one side of their mouths so many people will say it's about equality for all but insist we must use the feminine term over the genderless one we already have
Don't want to be judged on gender lines? Don't use gendered terms to describe yourself, simple
I won't get into the rest of the stuff in this thread, but I'll disagree with your first point.
Feminism is a word. An English word. And that means it's definition is driven by common usage not a book. If the common usage shifts to a toxic place, the meaning shifts with it.
If you disagree I'd love to hear your gymnastics around the word invcel, it's evolution into incel, and then that further extension to femcel (even though the person who coined invcel was a woman).
There is no such thing as a static definition. You're gonna have a real bad time in life communicating with people if you try to make that be your thing.
However since my whole message was about flexibility of definitions and you called my example whataboutism...I'm thinking you already have challenges communicating with people.
Really? Who? Give me some names and citations.
Read the rest of the comments, there's a few good examples.
So, people who aren't notable feminists and who could be trolls or bots? Gee, thanks, those sound like great sources.
Why are you even here then?
I'm commenting on an interesting post. The same reason why everybody else is here. Why do you ask?
Mingling with the bots and trolls?
In theory, yes. In practice, not always.
Sometimes it even meets that aspiration!
Thanks, buddy. A needed statement.