493
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] yarr@feddit.nl 168 points 1 week ago

I fucking HATE these clickbait headlines. Read the dang article and look at the quotes:

"I’m going to create these wellness farms where they can go to get off of illegal drugs, off of opiates, but also illegal drugs, other psychiatric drugs, if they want to, to get off of SSRIs, to get off of benzos, to get off of Adderall, and to spend time as much time as they need — three or four years if they need it— to learn to get reparented, to reconnect with communities," he said during the broadcast. (emphasis added)

RFK is a total whackjob, but it's pretty clear he's talking about some kind of voluntary "farm therapy" (which probably isn't demonstrably effective anyway) and not a concentration camp.

PLEASE we got enough bombastic language and clickbait over the Biden years. There are PLENTY of things wrong with the actual quote above without taking us into clickbait territory.

Let's criticize him on the grounds of being scientific but proposing very un-scientific actions. Let's criticize him for proposing ineffective solutions, but please, focus on his ACTUAL statement instead of trying to fluff it into some goddamn headline.

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

"Voluntary".... In the same way that gay conversion therapy is voluntary, or the same way those kid murdering behavioral farms are voluntary.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 week ago

Time to add futurism.com to my block list. What a useless rag.

[-] yarr@feddit.nl 15 points 1 week ago

100% They are part of the death of journalism. Inaccurate, hyped headlines that disagree with the body of the article. Designed to get "engagement" and not to inform. Fuck them.

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I've never seen a futurist community online that isn't just an attention-span-bankrupt group of headline-whores and hype-addicts, desperately trying to escape reality by embracing futurist ideas and sensational new stories without critical thought.

[-] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Voluntary, as in NYPD saying you’ll be arrested if you don’t voluntarily go into their overcrowded bedbug homeless shelter?

This is not as benign as you think. RFK already thinks vaccines annd prescribed meds are child abuse.

[-] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Although these wellness farms might seem like a worthwhile idea on paper, there are plenty of ways these kinds of systems could be rife with abuse. It's also unclear how different they would really be from the rehabilitation facilities that already exist across the country, and RFK's claims that most of the issues come down to not eating organic food also don't seem to be based on hard science.

https://www.distractify.com/p/rfk-wellness-farms

Means well but it sounds here like they'll be volunteering at a farm for 3-4 uears, wasting their time

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh yeah... "volunteering."

And for "as much time as they need."

Doesn't seem ominous at all from a guy with a brainworm in a government that's being jizzed on by the whole for-profit-prison industry. I'm sure they'll have no interest in these "wellness farms".

Arbeit macht frei.

[-] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

First thing that came to mind reading the headline

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

can we report this sort of thing here? downvoting has never worked.

[-] cybermass@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Lemmy needs a few more things, like reporting and time sort etc

[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 16 points 1 week ago

Stop fucking sane washing him. "If they want to" is a dubious statement coming from anyone in this authoritarian administration.

The fact that he brings up "reparenting", it seems fairly obvious that this is going to be done by authority of the state. He's talking about taking people's kids away from them if they medicate their children as recommended by their doctors.

[-] yarr@feddit.nl 18 points 1 week ago

Stop fucking sane washing him

You'll notice I called him a "total whackjob". I do not say he is sane. However, I wish to criticize what he ACTUALLY said instead of some bombastic caricature of his plan. In no way do I support or endorse RFK, but let's be accurate with our criticism.

[-] ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

Focus on the topic at hand. Making up all these statements will just make people roll their eyes when or if it actually happens. Don’t be the boy who cried wolf.

[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago

RFK endorses reparenting neurodivergent kids, and you want me to wait until it "actually happens". Absolutely not!

[-] ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

I have a neurodivergent kid and haven’t heard anything about this. Do you have any sources?

[-] yarr@feddit.nl 3 points 1 week ago

Can you link a source for this?

[-] yarr@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago

Very well put. I have 'outrage fatigue' from the past couple of years. Since RFK and Trump have so many dubious plans and statements, can't we find enough problems with what they have ACTUALLY said instead of having to catastrophize about the subtext of their words?

[-] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

You clearly have not read the history of Nazi era labor camps. They had very nice sounding propaganda for Germans to believe too.

Don't kid yourself. They mean forced labor camps.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Sure, totally voluntary. With barbed wire, guards, prison gangs, and court orders. Just like the reform schools for teenagers.

[-] yarr@feddit.nl -2 points 1 week ago

You should go write for futurism.com.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

This is exactly how the marketing for reform schools looks. They show pictures of happy kids doing fun things. And in reality they just torture kids into obedience.

[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Who decides if they need it ?

[-] yarr@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago

According to the RFK quote above, the person themselves. According to a lot of the posters in this thread: Republican Death Squads.

[-] Psythik@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Assuming this is government funded, I'd be more than happy to spend a couple of years at such a place. I need to take a break from reality and not worry about bills for a bit.

[-] yarr@feddit.nl 3 points 1 week ago

Some additional context: RFK proposed these farms will be funded by sales tax on cannabis products. Whether you consider that government funded or not is up to you.

[-] Psythik@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I don't care so long as food and shelter are provided, and I don't have to pay for it.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Reading the actual quote makes it sound a lot WORSE.

Less like "farm therapy" and more like:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Down_to_the_Countryside_Movement

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I got into great shape mentally and physically with a limited diet and constant farm chores. Of course, I was alone and not surrounded by brain worms piloting human hosts so maybe that was what worked.

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

People want excitement more than they want truth.

This is why Trump was elected again.

MAGAs are not some strange species of subhuman. They're humans like us, genetically identical almost, same with nazis and Jim Jones cultists and everyone else who has ever done anything inexplicable. They have the same vulnerabilities and the same biases and the same reactions. If they're dumber, then the stories their brains will tell them to explain their feelings will also be dumber, but your brain does the same thing every time you feel a thing.

We're all going to have to confront this unpleasant fact about just how much free-will we actually have in the coming decade as more and more of reality becomes compromised in our daily scrolling rituals, as more bots and scammers and influencers become far more sophisticated and intelligent in their schemes.

I hope that after some period of hardship and confusion we all look at information in a different way, as the internet becomes consumed by the AI slop engine and nobody can prove what's real anymore and anyone can manipulate anyone else's image and voice perfectly and we all have to embrace new attitudes towards ourselves and our ego.

[-] djsoren19@yiffit.net 2 points 6 days ago

We're all subhuman because humanity is a myth we invented for ourselves. We're still just dumb fucking apes, slinging our shit at apes that look different and mimicking the apes we think look like us. As a species we won't grow or reflect upon anything. We're just trying to filter out our civilization.

[-] yarr@feddit.nl 3 points 1 week ago

People want excitement more than they want truth.

This isn't what I want. I believe I am the minority opinion now.

[-] humble_pete_digger@lemm.ee -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I actually like the idea, if they fund it.
I could go away for a year no questions asked.

[-] yarr@feddit.nl 5 points 1 week ago

Assuming it is implemented as RFK says, I agree. I can see some people choosing to take some time on a farm to try to address their drug addictions.

Since neither Trump (nor RFK) have a track record of delivering, I will believe it when I see it. If people in the USA wrestling with drug addiction had a choice to work at a wellness farm it seems like a positive development to me. Since Team Trump is big on words and short on action, I won't give them the benefit of the doubt here. I suspect it's just another entry in the long list of stuff they talk about and then don't actually do.

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

from the description it sounds like public healthcare, rehab. yea, it sounds good

this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
493 points (86.5% liked)

politics

19144 readers
215 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS