115
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Frank@hexbear.net 31 points 4 days ago

They lack our values of rugged individualism and being a goddamned shithead! These godless youth!

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 25 points 4 days ago

Look if you ever reach the point of muttering about "Kids these days" and it's not about how they all suck at Counter Strike you are lost. Utterly lost. The spirit of humanity has died within you and is rotting. The kids will be fine. The kids have always been fine. There has never been a generation of The Kids in history that was truly weirder than their parents.

[-] AmericaDelendaEst@hexbear.net 16 points 4 days ago

You say that until you get dabbed on by the skibidi rizzler

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 14 points 4 days ago

Couldn't be. I'm the bees knees. I'm a hep cat. I'm the darb to all the dames down at the juice joint. Got my glad rags on, giggle water in hand, putting on the ritz so i can meet a nice sheba and go neck in the coatroom.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 days ago

The phrase "ritz rizzler" just entered my brain and now you have to think about it.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 7 points 3 days ago

"ritz rizzler"

When the past and the future come together to make something not quite as good as either!

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 4 points 3 days ago

Rizzin up the Ritz

[-] CloutAtlas@hexbear.net 1 points 3 days ago

Tubular lingo fam

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 15 points 4 days ago

I-was-saying I do think some generations are uniquely shittier than those that come before and afterward. The kids are all right, but most of the lead-infused boomers and almost as many of the Xers, not so much.

[-] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 14 points 4 days ago

I don't think judging a generation by those who survived is fair. The cool people tend to die earlier

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 7 points 4 days ago

You might have a point, but what killed the cool Xers, then?

[-] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 10 points 4 days ago

Material conditions or alternatively, were they ever that cool?

I have a theory that for many people, the youth-leftist thing isn't based in solidarity or whatever, it's based in self-interest - across generations. Makes sense to be a socialist, when you're poor, and all. As the survivors gain their riches, they get more conservative - they have property to "defend" now. They were always self-serving people, it's just they were occasionally in a position where that meant to be vaguely left.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 10 points 4 days ago

I-was-saying I became a leftist partially out of mutually-experienced suffering with future comrades, but primarily because I wanted others to be better off and happier. Maybe it was because of happy chemicals from helping others if some reductionist wants to be smug like that, but I still wanted to help others.

[-] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 3 points 3 days ago

I do not get this comment, could you be more direct?

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 6 points 3 days ago

I was stating that my own "youth leftist thing" wasn't necessarily self-interest unless you want to boil down the desire to help others and see them be well as neurochemically-driven "selfishness" or whatever.

[-] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 6 points 3 days ago

And I'd believe you, I don't think nobody helps others out of the good of their heart or whatever. Those people exist, loads of them are here.

I'm saying, when you get into generational views, it might not hold up for a large amount for them.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 8 points 3 days ago

As a numbers game, you're right, it doesn't.

My biological family is staggeringly loaded with chuds to the point that I moved to the opposite coast in part just to escape them.

Mine too. But they're old and need help, even though they don't see it that way. So I help them then get sick of them. Rinse repeat.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 9 points 3 days ago

I did that for decades of my life, but those chuds are on their own now. I'm raising a family of my own as far as I can be from their influence now. curry-space

[-] SuperNovaCouchGuy2@hexbear.net 4 points 3 days ago

Makes sense to be a socialist, when you're poor, and all. As the survivors gain their riches, they get more conservative - they have property to "defend" now. They were always self-serving people

Yeah wouldn't necessarily blame all this on people being ontologically "self-serving" from the beginning, thats liberal moralistic thinking. A shift towards cuckservativism its just an inevitable consequence of gaining wealth and property within a capitalist society. They weren't born selfish, they became selfish after years of indoctrination and falling into a position that strongly incentivises it.

this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
115 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13445 readers
793 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS