167
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] homhom9000@hexbear.net 19 points 2 months ago

Would be hilarious if this picked up on the right and they all decoupled themselves from the government to prove they're the real capitalist. Too bad ben doesn't seem to have that much influence anymore.

[-] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 20 points 2 months ago

They did try that libertarian township but they couldn't agree on garbage disposal and were invaded by bears.

The bears won.

[-] Comp4@hexbear.net 21 points 2 months ago
[-] PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

At least they didn't get overrun by pigs.

[-] context@hexbear.net 20 points 2 months ago

his funding is from fracking billionaires, mainly, so their goal is to gut the epa and environmental regulations generally. i guess he has enough of an audience to keep funding him, but i wonder if they've started pulling tighter on the purse strings lately.

[-] ryepunk@hexbear.net 11 points 2 months ago

They probably could be profitable without their sugar daddy. But they would have to make serious cutbacks, like they couldn't pay all the talent millions of dollars a year. It would actually have to worry about staff as well, they couldn't just rely on overpaying people for a year before they quit in disgust at being a part of such a heinous organization that is basically against everyone except extreme right wing religious positions.

So basically daily wire would implode without the buckets of cash they are handed. Oh also they couldn't afford to buy shit loads of ad space across all of social media if they were limited by subscriber donations. Which means they couldn't find more people watch because meema isn't seeing ad clips on Facebook video anymore.

[-] Dolores@hexbear.net 10 points 2 months ago

that wouldn't even be his idea that's just Galt's Gulch

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 10 points 2 months ago

Too bad Ben doesn't seem to have much influence even more

Why do you say this? All of these culture warrior ghouls are backed by some of the richest people in America

[-] homhom9000@hexbear.net 11 points 2 months ago

Not monetary influence but cultural. A lot of his base became more radical and moved on to something else so he's just a drop in the whole sphere.

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
167 points (99.4% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15908 readers
463 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS