sicklemode

joined 2 years ago
[–] sicklemode@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

I'm hardly surprised when it comes to the Poles. We're talking about the nation that just opened its doors and gave Ukrainian refugees basically full citizen rights, including the ability to run for office, law enforcement, be teachers, etc etc (seems they, like other EU nations really have a thing for importing nazism).

People in the US (at least) have always been promised better and delivered a heaping bag of steaming dog shit, which is pissing more and more people off every day.

[–] sicklemode@hexbear.net 40 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

See, this is the kind of shit that radicalizes young people. Older generations just nonchalantly gambling their children and grandchildren's futures and losing it, and then what? Often the responsibility is shifted to the ones who lost everything due to their greed and negligence.

stonks-down - "Like, sorry, no college fund for you, but I heard bootstraps work just as well" shrug-outta-hecks

Well, I bet their son will eventually be interested in a copy of Das Kaptial very-smart

[–] sicklemode@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

We leftists don't have time, resources, or largely even the desire to have children in such a shithole. We're also way more literate than the right and have a sense of forward thinking and planning, so we understand what parenthood requires.

We have a revolution to build, and simply don't want to be tied up in parenthood and join the ranks of the rest of the miserable, dysfunctional families capitalism has forcefully cultivated. Not only that, we're always considering what our theoretical children would want, since bringing them into this world isn't just about us. Don't forget, we were/are someone's kid. What did we get out of the arrangement? A front row seat to the end of a viable future. This is what we're supposed to reproduce? This is the burden we're supposed to force on someone else who didn't consent to being born in these conditions? Fuck. That.

The only way I'd have kids is if China or the DPRK guaranteed my theoretical partner and I a secure existence will full citizen rights, that way we'd have piece of mind we couldn't be rug pulled and sent back West to fucking die. The West cannot have my children, ever.

As for your question about being worried reactionaries are having many more kids, I honestly don't worry all that much. Those type of parents tend to be abusive and sabotage their children's interests, development and aspirations, or fight against them. How many of us are products of abusive reactionary families? Don't Elon Musk's kids hate him? Proletarianization is inevitable, and history always has a Marxist bias.

[–] sicklemode@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The Car is the hill westerners really are going to die on. As the rising cost of energy crimps our access to treats, the ability to just do donuts in a parking lot for hours on end will become the gold standard for American success. Westerners fucking worship the damned things.

Well, that and fireworks. China has moved onto drone light shows and displays to curb unnecessary emissions and pollution, but I can't see grillman parting with their damn "patriotic" explosives/explosions.

[–] sicklemode@hexbear.net 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Personally what intrigues me the most about breadtubers is how they become mild and inoffensive versions of themselves after becoming popular/well-off. Like, what causes that? Is it that the societal problems they criticized no longer applies to them? Is it the allure of advertising money? Is it secret CIA threats? I really do wonder.

The same exact cause for hungry as fuck "progressives" like AOC to settle and water down and tiptoe away from their original mission: They've switched classes and, therefore, their new class interests are in conflict with their original mission. What's there to be hungry about anymore when you start being fed really well? Why continue trying to destroy the status quo when it's benefiting you materially? This is why it's important to maintain loyalties to class interests (in this case, the interests of the proletariat), instead of individuals who are susceptible to corruption. China does this very well and provides the blueprint.

[–] sicklemode@hexbear.net 43 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Long enough to outlast your youth and the best years of your life, if you still are in the prime of it.

[–] sicklemode@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

No. Honestly, it makes you wonder if this trend of shaming those who have not engaged in intercourse is a ploy to serve the interest of getting working class people trapped in parenthood they didn't want and can't afford.

An obvious side effect of this is being less willing to engage in praxis and take risks, because now you have more to lose. It can, in many cases, serve to de-radicalize leftists.

[–] sicklemode@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago

The sins of those who colonized this land, and those who carry on the legacy, are so grave, so heinous, so barbaric that they can never be atoned for.

the sins of this guilty land will never be washed away but with blood

Precisely.

[–] sicklemode@hexbear.net 75 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

xi-lib-tears Thanks for all the free advertising.

[–] sicklemode@hexbear.net 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

These people's argument always collapses when you press them for their solutions to the problems plaguing liberal democracies. They can't talk you in circles if you keep digging for answers that you can then dismantle credibility for.

Ultimately, liberalism collapses under the pressure of dialectical materialism's analyses. Just walk them through it and they'll prove themselves to be full of shit for you.

[–] sicklemode@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago

I think they share the anxiety tone of this article's author by worrying about leftists being on the rise.

sicko-laser Exactly. Leftists being on the rise in stable spaces where the state cannot easily intervene or back them up (liberal hegemony in crisis). sicko-jammin

1
:snowglobe-us: (hexbear.net)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by sicklemode@hexbear.net to c/emoji@hexbear.net
 

Description: Someone who has succumbed to the cradle-to-grave disinformation campaign driven by the US and its vast media empire to believe the exact opposite of objective reality in the outside world and of world history itself. These people commonly believe the US and its vassal states (the Western world) to be the world or the international community. These people very often also believe in US exceptionalism and the idea that no matter how bad their country is, some socialist AES country, or peer-level rival (like Russia) is always arbitrarily worse. Thus, they live in a snowglobe and believe themselves a bigger deal than they actually are.

I wasn't able to find any instances of this being coined, so maybe I'm the first? Regardless, here's a new tool for everyone to use in the field of discourse.

 

The invisible hand guiding the marketplace of ideas, am I right? michael-laugh

 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/494539

I'm fucking dying over here! You can just tell there were tensions and resentment simmering way before we got here. Support to all the fellow comrades, and all the sensible decent people over there firing back at these chuds for having absolutely no argument grounded in tangible reality.

fidel-salute but also michael-laugh

1
Based Kakashi (hexbear.net)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by sicklemode@hexbear.net to c/memes@hexbear.net
 

I could see this being in a community's rules, if not the main page of the site. Too good michael-laugh

view more: ‹ prev next ›