boonhet

Wouldn't call that being a victim of communism personally. Victim of war more like.

Considering their other game was named DragonFable, an easy mistake to make lol

Chronic depression? Missing childhood?

I grew up poor in an Eastern European country and I still remember happiness. In my childhood and in high school. Middle school not so much, I was bullied then.

Age is 30.

What the actual fuck is this, please tell me this wasn't written by a sentient being?

Buy only one type of sock. I literally don't have odd socks anymore. I get a hole in one sock, I throw out one sock, not a pair.

Hmm, well, my ex is the kinda person to get pregnant just so she wouldn't have to work for a roof over her head and food in her mouth. So, combine that with her "I need to have at least 5 sexual partners in my life at any time" habit and her "I need to spend more money on useless shit than the entire budget for a family of 6" habit, the whole thing didn't last too long, shortly after the kid's 1st birthday, I kicked her to the curb (kid stayed with me of course).

First attempt to get back together: The "oh we can continue to have sex without being in a relationship" thing. Mistake on my part to even agree, she quickly moved back in with me without my consent. One day when she was out, after promising for about 2 weeks straight that she'd move out the next day, I just told her she's not welcome back. She then had to sell her car because her new boyfriend lied about being able to finance the down payment for her rental apartment. This got her into an abusive relationship with a person who is, quite literally, a carbon copy of her, personality wise. Holding money and his car over her so she can't leave him. Just like she held our child over me so I couldn't leave her (already during pregnancy she said, if I did something she didn't like, that she'll just dump my ass and make sure I'll never get to see the child). This sorta felt like karma honestly.

She's admitted this to me several times, so attempt #2 to get back together was when she had a mini-breakup with the new guy. She asked if I'd help her get a car of her own so she can at least go to work without depending on the guy. I said I'd consider it. Then a while later said nah, sorry, can't help. Still helped her financially because there was an implication on her part that if I wouldn't, she'd immediately sue me for custody.

End of September rolls around, and I say to her, hey, you have a boyfriend, why do I still have to help you out... After that, she kidnaps our child, makes a million excuses for it, but I can't REALLY prove it's because I refused to buy her a car. Oh well. I don't see my child for about a month after that, which is technically illegal, but it doesn't matter, because laws don't apply to her.

End of October rolls around, she calls me, says her boyfriend hit her, could I please come pick up the kid and bring 'em back tomorrow. I say sure. I drive over, record the entire in-person exchange. She says her boyfriend has been yelling at the child quite often, and she's powerless to stop him, he apparently just said "well you just aren't cut out to be a mother then" when she said yelling at a 1.5 year old isn't the way to discipline them, especially from someone who isn't even a parent of said child. She also says that her boyfriend had hit her while she was holding the child. And that HE said she couldn't allow ME to see my child. She asks if she can come with me, I say no, at best I can drop her off at some friend's house, but I don't want her at my home. I leave.

Next day, I tell her she's not getting the kid back. She emails me saying I have no right to do this, and that "just because there was a police car in front of the apartment building, you can't immediately assume there's anything going on at our home", etc. CPS has already been informed of everything she'd said the previous day and I consulted my lawyer as well. They said it was absolutely fine for me to not allow the child back into such circumstances. There are about 4 or 5 email exchanges between us where she just ignores it when I repeat to her what she'd said that day, and focuses on the police car and "my assumptions", when I explain to her why she can't have the kid back.

For the next month, I keep telling her she can't take the child to her place. I'm willing to meet up with her, and go to a park or someplace where she can play with the child. I offer two dates, and when she says "Oh I offered you 3 days per week, all you offer me is two days, not recurring" and I told her "I'm not the one trying to limit you to any specific days or dates, those are just the days I have available THIS week, but if you find a time slot that works for you some other day, just tell me ahead of time and we'll make it work". She ignores this. We have this exact email exchange 2 or 3 times. She still claims to this day that I only offered her one date, ever, and then proceeded to deny her any opportunity of seeing the child - despite the fact that I clearly outlined why I can't trust her to take the child to her place, and that she'd be welcome to see them any time, just gotta let me know in advance.

At the recommendation of the CPS employee, I still caved in and let her take the child after about a month. First time she brings the kid back, but keeps the car seat, saying she bought it so it's hers to keep, and that I should buy a new one. Of course what she ignores is that I sent her the money to buy it that time, and that we were married so anything we bought together is shared property anyway.

Second time, I tell her that I'm just giving her the child, nothing else. I don't want to see any more of the kid's things on sale, because I've already lost a LOT of clothes and stuff I've bought for them. She just kept looting them. She says "well if you're going to be like that then I'm telling CPS I can't trust the child back with you" and that's exactly what she does. Again, a million excuses in an email she sent to me the next morning, but I again recorded the entire exchange.

We're in family mediation now. Have to go through it before I can sue her. She just keeps lying, including about things I have proof of. I don't tell her I have proof. We agreed on some times where I can meet the child, including today for a few hours. We meet up, go to a playground, she's oddly friendly. As she puts the kid back in her car, she tells me that actually as soon as she can get back on her feet financially, she's leaving her boyfriend because he keeps lying to her about debts, other girlfriends and employment. Everything, really. She's been collecting proof. She asks if I she can give me a hug, I say no, it'd be weird. A bit later in the conversation she asks yet again if I see any future where we're together again. I have a recording of this entire exchange too. I actually have more shit, but these are some of the conversations she'd be most devastated to find out that I can prove.

My proposal at the family mediation is going to be that until she can get back on her feet, the kid lives with me, but visits her of course, and after that we can have the mediation again, maybe in like a year and a half. Maybe the kid can live with her then, if she's improved a few key aspects of her life and personality. Because never in this entire thing have I wanted to take the kid away from her, but I need to protect my offspring.

Ah btw, this entire time she's been on sick leave from work. Literally since september, and she also took out sick leave in august, for a job she started in august, after she quit (or got fired from) the job she had for almost the whole month of july.

We have indeed successfully rebuilt the old reddit spirit that so many of us missed!

Look, if you're an enthusiast, that sounds great. Me, I don't get recommendations from friends - even if a friend recommends something, I don't usually bother listening anymore because in my personal case, the only ones who mention the artists they discover, have such a wildly different taste in music I just get nothing out of it.

The NPR Tiny Desk concerts sound cool, actually there's a similar concept in a local public radio in my country called "mini live" where an artist or group of artists present one or two songs (sometimes an original and a cover). But that's one episode a week and who knows if I'm even listening to the radio at that time. I don't really seek out radio programmes, I just listen to radio while driving.

I just find it easier to... Put on a song I know I like on YouTube Music, and let it autoplay similar shit. If I run into shit I dislike, I skip it and click dislike. If I find something new I like, I check out the name of the song, click like and if it's something I really like, then next time I might just start from that song, or listen to other songs from the same artist.

Currently the song I most often start off with is NF - Story which usually gives me, in some order, some of his other great tracks, and many other great hip-hop artists. Put it this way, the algorithm already knows not to give me Drake or Ye, but also knows I like Kendrick Lamar, Eminem, etc. And occasionally sprinkles in lesser known artists that tend to be good too. That's how I discovered NF in fact. Not that he's super unknown, but compared to Em and Kendrick, he might as well be nameless lol

I find I'm just so drained from all that's going on in my life, I don't have the energy to put into a discovery process like yours. I'm literally minmaxing finding music I like for as little effort as possible lol

Also just to add, I just do this on desktop with adblock enabled. On my phone I listen to podcasts and in the car it's public broadcast radio (so no ads)

It's like man milk I guess

Unfortunately here in Estonia we have winters so power is expensive. A Nissan Leaf isn't a very nice car, an ICE with a similar ride quality would be cheaper too.

Used car economics is wildly different, but it ONLY works because people are still afraid of the batteries. Remove that fear and EVs should depreciate significantly LESS. Actually for that point: if you factor in the current extra depreciation EVs have, it's even worse to buy a NEW EV atm. And Ford is trying to sell new EVs, not used ones. Once this trend reverses, new EVs become a better buy and used ones might become a worse buy.

I assume that was meant at the Kaalep part. Yes, he's a known piece of shit around people in Tartu who frequented bars and such around 10 years ago. I've told this story without mentioning the name first and a coworker went "oh, was it Kaalep?" Like I said, the real issue is the lack of solid evidence. Can't prosecute someone without that. What he said that time was bad enough that it could likely have been prosecuted as hate speech, BUT he was drunk on Rüütli street and not being recorded. If he'd said it as a public statement on Twitter or something, I reckon at least something would've been done.

It could very well be, I'm just saying this isn't a smoking gun that Putin necessarily has the photos, but the thing having happened is implied more strongly.

I don't know any more than you do, but that's just how it sounds to me: the thing likely happened, the existence of photos is implied too, but the Putin part could be meant either seriously or jokingly. That part sounds kinda iffy to me.