What else could it possibly be?
I'll take any evidence, hopefully at some point it will be useful at the trial, but there's no possible way that denying food to a civilian population for months at a time can be anything except a strategy to starve them. This isn't like Ireland in the 1800s when they were taking the food away to do something else with it. It's there, and they're just leaving it to rot, undelivered.
Everybody needs someone to check them. Any time some person just gets to do whatever they want, it starts falling flat or getting corrupted, because people are severely imperfect. Work together though, fill in each other's weaknesses and oversights, and you can do fantastic things.