It's only cheaper if the mistakes it makes cost less to fix than paying a human to do it in the first place. That said, shifting operating costs to operating risk usually looks good on paper because the risks don't get quantified properly or at all.
Enkers
Don't trust that other guy. There's no such thing as a free lunch. I can offer it to you on a payment plan of 24 easy monthly payments of $0.
The researchers analyzed data from Canadian mobile devices travelling to U.S. metro areas
Yeah, there's your problem. People I know leave their phone at home and use a burner for US travel now.
Ok, you're going to have to share with the class.
Thanks for reminding me I've got a daki on the way. Time to check the mail every hour.
Lemme guess: it works perfectly fine in chrome. Google has been using this sort of anticompetitive tactic for years to wage war against other browsers.
I have NoScript for JS tracking, but what do you use for fingerprint randomisation?
That's kind of him, I got tired of losing The Game years ago.
Yes, maths. It's the alternative short form of mathematics.
Exactly. I've got to leave a deposit with my landlord in case I leave a mess when i move out, same should go for these oil companies.
There is a good chance... Probabilistically, the early bird theory is unlikely. If development of life were to follow a normal distribution, it'd be highly improbable that we'd be in the tails as opposed to the main body.
I feel like there's a middle ground between your two posts, like the speed limit should be lowered by 5 and that should be added as a margin of error. That way you don't get angry people behind you for going under the speed limit when you're just trying to not get a ticket.
I'm not sure it's super constructive to be so antagonistic, especially when the other person has a valid concern.