271
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 32 points 9 months ago

Man, I really, really wish the writers had the foresight and carefulness in their writing to come up with some acceptable phlebotinum justifying why transporter clones and other various transporter transformations not just don't, but indeed can't happen.

I get that it makes for some plotlines, but it also makes for so much idiotic fridge logic. Like "why don't they save a pattern buffer copy of EVERY away team in case of emergency" or "why isn't the federation using a volunteer clone army for military engagements" or indeed what we here.

Or even "why isn't federation surgery just loading someone into the transporter buffer then editing their XML to fix the injury".

And don't even get me started by the wasted potential of holography, especially during and post-Voyager.

[-] andthenthreemore@startrek.website 6 points 9 months ago

Or at least DISCO had used its 31st century setting to explore sci-fi concepts around any of these ideas. Like full on Iain M Banks The Culture, restoring people from their most recent mind state back up.

[-] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

The T.O.G. has a moratorium on unauthorized cloning, and you DON'T. EVER. disobey T.O.G. directives.

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 10 points 9 months ago

Honestly, I can almost buy that explanation.

...until you realize that even the Jem'Hadar won't do it. They had transporters, right? I could maybe buy that the Romulans, Cardassians, and Klingons would refuse to do it based on some combination of pride and honor, maybe. I could never buy that an organization like Section 31 wouldn't, though, or any number of the monster-of-the-week species.

[-] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

That obviously just means the T.O.G. is a pan-galactic body, that's infiltrated every technologically advanced society... You know they're crazy, if not even the Jem'Hadar will cross them.

[-] Terminus@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

The Bene Gesserit would like a word with you sir...

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I bet the T.O.G somehow managed to transport over to the Kelvin universe and grab that "single person intergalactic handheld transporter and some other bullshit that lets a person transport to Kronos from Earth with no ship because j.j. Abrams dont give no shits about star trek" device.

Once you have access to that tech, you can use it to tag anyone anywhere and toss them into the nearest star with nary a word.

No shit no one fucks with the T.O.G.

[-] Mnemnosyne@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 9 months ago

I think a good part of the reason they never addressed this is that there's no good answer. Any answer that posits it to be impossible that I can think of comes with awkward connections to the idea of a 'soul' or some such nonsense that makes duplicates non-viable, which I'm sure they really didn't want to introduce.

After all, it's not like transporters were part of a well thought out extensively considered backstory when they were first introduced. As I understand it, the issue was they didn't have the budget to keep shooting shuttlecraft scenes in every episode, so they came up with a way they could get the characters to the planet without having to use a vehicle in most situations. This decision has had its upsides and downsides, but I think on the whole, it has created far more issues than it ever solved. This is far from the only plot point that has issues in order for story to work with transporters. And considering how often they encounter situations where the transporters don't work, from an in-universe perspective the technology seems...unwise...to use on exploratory vessels.

[-] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

One which, I imagine, will only ever be hinted at, but never embraced.

[-] buzz86us@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

They did a resurrection in Star Trek lower decks

[-] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 9 months ago

It's easy for me to say with no time pressure and having had years to think it over, but I think rapidly decaying memory integrity would solve that issue. Saying a person's data was large and complex and pushed even the limits of the technology would explain why they couldn't just digitize everybody. The computer can only hold one pattern at a time and/or it degrades quickly.

This same caveat could also create limit on the amount and complexity of matter that could be transported, as well as create drama around technological arms races to build better computers to transport more crew at a time giving an edge to boarding parties to one side of a war.

[-] Stamets@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

Well this is genius. I need this to replace that Jesse format so bad...

[-] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 months ago
[-] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 months ago

High praise from one of our resident memeologists! thanks! <3

[-] OpenStars@startrek.website 11 points 9 months ago

You would think Troi would have learned by now never to ask Barclay such a question!:-O

[-] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 13 points 9 months ago

She probably asked "How are you feeling, Reg?"

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

"Guilty about what I did to you 10 minutes ago in the holodeck"

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago

Punish me!

-Barclay

[-] OpenStars@startrek.website 7 points 9 months ago

OMG you are probably right! :-P

[-] Infynis@midwest.social 5 points 9 months ago

O'Brien has access to this power, but chooses not to extend his own suffering. He already got sentenced to one extra life, and that was enough for him

[-] workerONE@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

So they can store people in the buffer like in the new Star Trek or can they make copies of people

[-] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

TNG s6e4 "Relics" demonstrated the ability to sustain a buffer pattern almost indefinitely.

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Voyager did it too when they were smuggling the telepaths through devore space

And SNW with the

spoiler
doctor's sick daughter

[-] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

The latter is connected with my favorite s1 episode. It requires the build-up of episodes past, but the payoff hits so hard. Not to mention, it's the silliest damn episode this side of TOS.

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

it’s the silliest damn episode

That's a hard competition with the next few ones on the series.

[-] MaggiWuerze@feddit.de 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It was always my understanding, that people are stored digitally in the transporter buffer, so of course they could be stored there for extended periods of time. That's also why I was surprised when people argued that you cant copy people with the teleporter. For me it always was a remote replicator

[-] A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

But how do you maintain youth without also losing that knowledge if this is done by making copies of yourself?

[-] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)
[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 9 months ago

It's already established that transporters can edit someone's DNA, so that would be a way to prevent aging and treating genetic diseases. If you have a way to duplicate the buffers then you could make a backup for cases when someone dies from an accident at the cost of a few hours of memories.

[-] Poggervania@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

I like to think this is the prequel to the Barclay greentext about committing suicide via launching a giant Troi at himself

this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
271 points (98.9% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3680 readers
600 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Hating someone off of their race, culture, creed, sexuality, or identity is not remotely acceptable. Mistakes can happen but do your best to respect others.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon' and fuck over our artist friends.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@jawa21@startrek.website for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS