this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
-30 points (24.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26916 readers
1667 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Now that Mozilla will start selling ads what is the best Firefox alternative?

cc @asklemmy@lemmy.world

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 79 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Way way way too early to say we need to ditch firefox.

What we know is that Mozilla, firefox's parent, bought an ad company with the stated goal to make privacy friendly advertisements.

Also this week (I believe, maybe a bit earlier) Firefox announced that they are holding to manifest v2's rules for adblocking, that they are encouraging ublock and other apps to still block ads.

Firefox needs money to continue development though to be competitive with Chrome. Ads are the only real way to make money on the internet. There is nothing that suggests that they are adding ads to firefox, to me it sounds more like they want sites to use their privacy focused ad service to fund their development of firefox because they weren't receiving enough donations - which makes sense.

I'm not going to ditch my browser of 20 years over fear that something might happen. If something happens like that, then sure I'll change to something else. Remember though, all of the alternatives are chromium based, which is mostly controlled by Google. By giving up Firefox you're allowing Google to make their monopoly, because Firefox is the only other real browser engine out there.

So, rather than be reactionary, I'd say let's give them the benefit of the doubt and see where it goes.

[–] Brewchin@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Most level-headed reaction to the issue I've seen to date. Thanks for saying it.

If a company has had a decent record to date, I prefer to wait to see if they hang themselves with their own rope rather than rage quitting on insufficient information.

They've done some questionable things in the past that can be explained by over-zealous PMs and such, so I'll wait to see how this plays out.

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago

fork it if it starts to suck

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Still Firefox.

Just remember, the Mozilla Corporation who owns the Mozilla Foundation who owns Firefox purchased the ad provider. Not Firefox themselves.

[–] lengau@midwest.social 11 points 5 months ago

FWIW, it's the Mozilla Foundation that owns the Mozilla Corporation. It's a minor nit, but also an important distinction, as the non-profit has more control (the opposite of many " foundation" structures).

[–] Matt 3 points 5 months ago

Mozilla Foundation owns Mozilla Corporation.

Mozilla Corporation, which is responsible for Firefox, is what also purchased Anonym.

[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Your conclusion is premature at this point. There's no indication that Firefox will no longer be the best.

[–] SeikoAlpinist@slrpnk.net 16 points 5 months ago

Probably still Firefox. The web is shit.

[–] Oha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz 7 points 5 months ago
[–] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

Probably some fork of Firefox if Mozilla starts doing evil stuff

[–] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

All of the Firefox forks are Firefox with a user.js added to it. So just use Firefox with a user.js. Here's three user.js'.

[–] BurningTurtle@feddit.org 3 points 5 months ago
[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

maybe Gnome Web aka Epiphany

[–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

A little late to this one but Librewolf is a pretty solid privacy based fork of Firefox that comes prepackedwith UBO and hardened security settings on by default