336
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 102 points 1 week ago

Please back that up with enough money to more than offset Miriam Adelson

[-] Beaver@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago

You can also use the Goods Unite Us app to do business with companies that donate to the democrat party

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Do these companies also donate to the republican party? Or can you filter out those companies?

[-] Beaver@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

Yes, as a lot of them do. It uses a ratio scale. If you create an account then select either political affiliation or no political affiliation then it will suggest which companies fit in best for your values.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

There's every indication that we'll see another huge mystery donation soon like Biden got last cycle.

Impetus has been quiet so far. But campaign finance experts have noticed stirrings. Earlier this month, after four years of operation, Impetus launched a website. Entering the campaign late, as it did in 2020, has advantages. If Impetus cranks up its fundraising later this summer, the dark money watch dogs will have nothing to chase until public filings are disclosed — after the election is over. Impetus did not respond to a request for comment.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-64-million-mystery-anonymous-donations-2024-presidential-campaign/

I.posted that article the other day, but it was so up voted I doubt anyone read it first.

Most speculate the money originated with a single, super-wealthy Biden supporter. But it could also have come from a privately held company or a shell corporation, an increasingly common tactic used by well-heeled donors seeking to add layers of anonymity to their political largesse. It remains a $64 million mystery — and while legal, it's one that critics say underscores what's wrong with today's campaign finance system.

"Without information about who is funding groups spending to influence elections, voters won't know who is trying to color their views, won't be aware of any potential conflicts of interest that a funder has or what stake they may have in the outcome of the election," said Anna Massoglia, editorial and investigations manager at OpenSecrets, a non-partisan watchdog organization that tracks the influence of money on politics.

Money isn't Biden's concern, votes are. Well, at least that should be.

[-] 555@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

That’s because she doesn’t hang out with child molesters like Trump and bill gates.

[-] Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

I mean..... she was married to one of those guys for over 2 decades

[-] 555@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

And she got rid of him when she found out.

[-] dezmd@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

He had several affairs become public, and that's what led to the divorce, don't just make shit up. Qanon is not a reliable source.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Wait, what? What's the context?

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Bill Gates

a) is a billionaire

b) met with Epstein many times

c) got his ass divorced because she found about his affair with a 20 year old, which Epstein knew about

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Ok. Where can I read more about the affair with the 20-year-old?

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

https://www.wsj.com/articles/jeffrey-epstein-bill-gates-affair-russian-bridge-player-8b2022ff

This is the original report, but I don't know how to do the thing to stop paywalls

[-] ccunning@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

From her Wikipedia article:

According to The Wall Street Journal, Melinda Gates had been meeting with divorce lawyers since at least October 2019 after Bill's business dealings with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein became public, and she had warned him about associating with Epstein as early as 2013.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's circumstantial evidence. I'm not saying Gates is a saint. It's just that no one has given me real proof of that claim.

[-] ccunning@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

You asked for context; not evidence.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

You're right, friend. Thanks for the context.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago

Why don't Child Rapists and Racists and Billionaires who kill Whistleblowers support Biden? CHECKMATE LIBRULS!

[-] hactar42@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

Just a reminder she was a big part of Microsoft Bob, which without we would not have comic sans. Not relevant to anything here, but an interesting footnote in her career.

[-] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago

Still a better UI experience than Vista

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
336 points (97.7% liked)

politics

18050 readers
2669 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS