565
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Leaked Microsoft memo tells managers not to use budget cuts as an explainer for lack of pay rises: ‘Reinforce that every year offers unique opportunity for impact’::Managers are being ordered to dodge employees' questions about how the latest budget cuts will impact their pay.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 231 points 1 year ago

This is so backwards. I had to read this a few times to try to make sense of the memo. Apparently, the reasoning is that instead of telling employees that they didn't get a raise because of company-wide cuts, try to convince them that they just did a bad job?

That's stupid. That would obviously have the opposite effect of softening the disappointment. Whoever wrote this memo is an idiot who has no idea what employees do or what they think.

[-] evatronic@lemm.ee 102 points 1 year ago

It's only stupid if you think Microsoft wants to retain employees.

The tech industry is contracting after over expanding during the pandemic and, instead of layoffs, MS is hoping to get to their budget cuts by attrition.

[-] million@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago
[-] jonne@infosec.pub 24 points 1 year ago

Don't worry, if a competitor shows up (possibly started by an ex employee), they can just buy them. The lack of any kind of anti trust enforcement made the whole concept of innovation by competition irrelevant.

[-] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

What I don't get about this is that presumably you'd lose more of the high performing employees that can find a better offer, and be left with people who can't afford to lose their job (no hate to them, these are human beings, but what I'm trying to point out is that the people who will quit will be the people with the most experience and other job prospects)

Seems counter-productive long term

[-] nxdefiant@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago

Upper management would have to value employees for this to make sense.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, this is a tactic used by lots of the large software companies when they want to raise the bottom lines, and phase out an aging workforce because saying the word "layoffs" affects share price. It also helps to reduce the salary demands of any incoming workers to replace the outgoing, because the baseline gets reset without having to justify why profits are high, but workers won't be getting any of that (previous position at 75% premium, but incoming at 25% less than scale).

An example with Google in 2021-2022: tell all your middle-managers they'll need to do something unreasonable like relocate to keep their job, wait for some to leave, then put the rest on PIPs and promise their underlings they can apply for the soon-to-be vacant role if they keep up the good work. Effectively, Google only had to publicly acknowledge firing 12,000 employees, when closer to 20,000 were displaced for various reasons. It's a shitty shell game to keep the share price high, and force people who stick around to do more work for less money.

[-] Haui@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 year ago

I might get sick. This is so disgusting I can’t even. Thanks for pointing that out. As an entrepreneur, I always try to make it worth everyones time. Seeing stuff like this just makes me sad.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

No companies will always frame any negative situation as the employees fault. It's gasslighting 101

[-] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 year ago

I just want to add that my brother had this happen today. He's a contractor at Aerojet Rocketdyne, and he asked his direct report whether they'll be renewing his contract next month. They said that they didn't know, because a high level manager who has never met him or likely seen any piece of his work is still assessing my brother's performance.

I pointed out that based on what he knows of the project and his role, he's fully qualified to answer this question: is it at all possible that they're invested in the success of the project, but think that letting him go and then starting a totally new contract hire search is going to make the project any less expensive or faster?

The answer is obvious. They might let him go because they lose interest in this wildly neglected project, but his performance is objectively nowhere near a level where replacing him would save time or money, and if they were serious this decision would've been made weeks ago. They clearly have no idea what they're doing next month and negging him while they try to figure out what the hell their goals are.

[-] ohlaph@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I would find a new contract and bounce at the end without notice.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My company tanked last year and I ended up getting laid off, and as part of the process senior leadership owned the budget problems and in my layoff, I was given full pay for 16 weeks and uncontested unemployment (which I did not end up needing), as well as a job recommendation. Fortune 100 company.

Microsoft fucked up here and this manager memo is ridiculously stupid. This is how you hemorrhage the talent you're trying desperately to keep during budget shortfalls.

Companies aren't supervillains. They're just people, and people here fucked up.

[-] Eranziel@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Meanwhile the C-suite are getting record compensation and stock buybacks. There is no "budget shortfall", it's just typical greed at the top that's hoping the rank and file will swallow it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] silvercove 21 points 1 year ago

Apparently, the reasoning is that instead of telling employees that they didn’t get a raise because of company-wide cuts, try to convince them that they just did a bad job?

This is what you do if you want to encourage attrition.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jtk@lemmy.sdf.org 136 points 1 year ago

Every corp knows we're in late stage capitalism. They're not even trying to hide it anymore. Any individual that makes a billion dollars should be viewed as an enemy, even millionaires should be very nervous.

[-] Blastasaurus@lemm.ee 43 points 1 year ago

What - you can't even buy a nice two-bedroom condo here for a million dollars, I think you need to re-evaluate what a millionaire is today.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Buying a million dollar house and being a millionaire are two different things. Multi millionaires are part of the problem as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Vent@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago

You pretty much need to be a multimillionaire to retire these days and it's not that hard to do with a half decent job and basic retirement planning, especially when factoring in a home to your net worth (which is standard). Millionaires are not the enemy. $1m is 1000x closer to $0 than $1B.

[-] Sharkwellington@lemmy.one 53 points 1 year ago

I don't disagree with the sentiment, but "get a half decent job, do basic planning, and factor in the cost of the home you definitely own" is a massive simplification and a lot of people cannot meet those requirements through no fault of their own.

[-] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 year ago

Yeah, thats already proper middle class, and middle class is pretty hard for a lot of people to attain these days.

[-] Haui@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 year ago

Most people are not even able to accumulate any capital while paying bills. If you‘re not in the fortunate position of a collage education or similar, you‘re pretty fucked.

Even with a college education, you’re usually fucked.

Most people talking about how to become multimillionaires have the benefit of generational wealth. Even if they’re not directly dipping in to family funds, it’s a support system that us poors don’t have.

[-] Sharkwellington@lemmy.one 11 points 1 year ago

Always have to link this comic when generational wealth comes up.

Personally I know that I'm one of the ones who lucked out. My family wasn't rich but we didn't struggle. I'd like that to be the minimum experience for everybody.

[-] Haui@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

Tell me about it. Grew up poor, kicked out of school due to undiagnosed neurological stuff.

I did manage to build a company out of thin air (and working 16 hrs a day). Then covid happened. I‘m rather gonna starve than go back an suck corpo cock.

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

Not saying everyone can do it, just that we're all on the same side. It's important to remember who your friends are. The doctor that works 12h+ a day and has a few million in the bank is not the same as the billionaire playing God and zipping around to all major world events in their private jet while siphoning profits from thousands of workers.

That depends on which side the doctor decides to support. A few million lets you play the game, and even if you’re just a pawn, you can do some damage.

[-] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 year ago

What about us hundredaires?

[-] tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk 7 points 1 year ago

You have a positive balance? :o

[-] nevemsenki@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Two negatives are a positive, right?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Wahots@pawb.social 68 points 1 year ago

Meanwhile, Microsoft’s chief marketing officer Christopher Capossela told employees angry about the lack of salary raises that their best way to increase their pay is to make the stock go higher—after cashing out $4.4 million worth of stock.

Classy.

[-] notannpc@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

In other words “Leaked memo tells managers to lie”.

It’s not the lie that matters. It’s what the lie is.

I think most of us just assume lying is the standard from companies.

[-] Zardoz@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

'unique opportunity for impact'

Impact can't pay my fucking debt

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

Fuck Microsoft and Fuck Satya Nadella

[-] VicentAdultman@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

How did big tech companies got like these? Bigger cut for owners? I remember when a person got a job in Microsoft, Google, etc, it meant that they were financial stable in a good job that didn't drain all of their energy. We need tech more than ever now. Is it because there are so many devs these days? AI? All these things all together?

[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 34 points 1 year ago

Free investor money ran out with the higher interest rates. The higher interest rates that were made to combat inflation, which again are mostly because of corporate greed.

Basically wages were going up, workers were getting a bigger slice of the pie against corporate profits - not that profits were dropping mind you, just not going up as fast as wages for a bit. So corporations as a block decided that the shock from supply chain distruptions means they get to raise prices. Somehow supply chain disruptions didn't show up on the bottom line though, so they got to make record profit, but we got record inflation. The gutted governments instead of taxing the windfall profits, because they can't do that because politics, were just watching as central banks increased interest rates that clobbered wages back.

It's just the system in action, when the 200 oligarchs holding the reins in America decide the workers of the "free world" have a bit too much, they crank up prices, which decreases wages even beyond the effect of said price increases.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago

This is capitalism working as intended.

[-] Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

Cunts. Same shit different day.

Rich get richer.

[-] Commiunism@lemmy.wtf 31 points 1 year ago

Literally carrot on a stick tactics

[-] Gazumi@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Men, many of you won't survive, but think of the glory! Hail Microsoft!!!!

[-] Biscuit303@reddthat.com 9 points 1 year ago

"You see, killbots have a preset kill limit. Knowing their weakness, I sent wave after wave of my own men at them until they reached their limit and shut down." - Captain Zap Brannigan

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

"Sorry, you're not getting a cost of living increase this year, but what you need to focus on is how impactful your work has been."

[-] zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago

The reward is in thinking of all the money you're making us!

[-] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Please enjoy these photos of me and my family on the yacht you helped me afford. I hope the smiles on their faces bring you some warmth and joy inside your dank, overpriced basement apartment.

Keep up the good work!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] skymtf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 year ago

I kinda hate how it seems like programming will be at best a 30 per hour job in the future, likely leading to me needing two jobs. Its like I just graduated and I'm kinda frustrated with the state of this industry

I spent a bunch of time in the meat grinder.

Your bosses, and you'll have many, will be dumb. Your peers will have egos, and when they finally get a promotion (probably one that doesn't include a pay increase), they'll go out of their way to stifle any creative control you might have. By the time you burn out you'll probably find that your 20's are gone, you have no 'management' experience, and companies that are hiring are only looking for 'junior programmers with 10 years experience'. Then there's ChatGPT... which I've literally heard a manager, a guy that couldn't figure out how to open a PDF to save his life, say 'why do we need developers if ChatGPT can write code?' That's a whole new thing that's happening now that I'm not sticking around for.

I personally branched out of programming and got actual experience in Electrical Engineering, and am working on a business degree. Life is better now. I get to touch grass.

I'm telling you this, because after years of working in the industry I can tell you exactly why programmers get paid six figure salaries. You have to sit in one spot for 40-60 hours a week thinking about and solving puzzles that other people just don't want to. Few people can do this. I'm not kidding when I say I most of my coworkers have some kind of autism or an Adderall addiction. And your bosses won't appreciate what you do, because they simply won't understand it.

In a sincere desire to help you not make the mistakes I made, consider front-loading any additional education you might want. Don't put it off. Push back on working additional unpaid hours. Don't go in on weekends, or work additional hours. A promotion or pay raise only exists if you have it in your hand. The people at work aren't your friends, and you don't owe them anything. You deserve respect.

I don't mean to scare you off from the field. It has been highly rewarding, and I still love working with computers, but burnout is a very real thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] skymtf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago

Not to mention back to the office bullshit will sooner or later force me to move somewhere with a 10X cost of living.

[-] Sarcastik@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Not to be too harsh, but welcome to the life of pretty much every other 4 year degree professional.

Cost of college keeps going up, while salary and career prospects continue to decline.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I wish I could have lived long enough to see Micro$oft go bankrupt and dissolve. They have brought nothing but toxicity to the tech community, and I've been in this game for almost 4 decades.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
565 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59081 readers
3563 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS