this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
166 points (98.3% liked)

News

37121 readers
1657 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Clearview AI, a facial recognition start-up that scraped more than 30 billion photos from social media, can’t afford to pay the settlement bill from its class-action lawsuit so is offering Americans a stake in its company instead.

The New York-based company was sued in a federal court in Chicago in litigation that has proven so costly that Clearview AI says it will go bankrupt before making it to trial.

The unusual settlement offers members of the lawsuit a collective 23 percent stake in Clearview AI; an amount that is currently valued at $52 million, per The New York Times.

Members of the class could be literally anyone in the United States who has posted a photo of themselves online so anyone who does submit a claim could be entitled to a cut of the proceeds from a public flotation or an acquisition.

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee 104 points 2 years ago (2 children)

So let me see if I get this straight:

Some guy robs you and since they can't pay the settlement bill for robbing you, they are offering you a stakeholder position in their further crimes?

[–] 555@lemmy.world 44 points 2 years ago

Everyone is just seeing how far they can go nowadays.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If everyone is an accessory, no one has standing to sue.

[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Here's the thing: everyone but you would be an accessory, so you can sue everyone who got stonks. Settle for getting their stonks, and you get 23% of (what was) the company.

(I wish I was only half-kidding, but the US be the US)

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 43 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Devoid of ethics. Company using stolen goods to get started offers profits from stolen goods going forward. How TF is this legal? That's a rhetorical question fwiw.

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Well you see it's like this....

*proceeds to go into 8 page explanation

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Nothing more valuable than shares in a company in such a poor financial state that it can't pay its own settlements.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 3 points 2 years ago

It would close out all these claims and allow creditors to take over the data and sell it tho

[–] lauha@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago

Less ridiculous than a losing country offering a "peace deal" where the better off country gives them all the land they wished for and promise not to join Nato.

[–] drdiddlybadger@pawb.social 31 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If companies are people we should execute one

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Companies are people right up to the moment a felony is committed but no further.

[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 years ago

We should execute plenty. (Companies, not people, except possibly the CEOs.)

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 27 points 2 years ago

Their business is built entirely on stolen data so they're selling off a minority of shares.

Fuck these clowns.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago

So it's bankruptcy, then.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Mmmm no I think we’re still going to sue.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

And pass up on this unique opportunity to join the bourgeoisie?

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Don't post pictures of yourself online, I guess.

[–] A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Expecting your stuff to remain private online is like leaving your belongings on the sidewalk and expecting nobody to touch them.

[–] wkk@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 3 points 2 years ago

Vanishingly few.

[–] Meansalladknifehands@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

Sure you can, but if your friend does it, work, school, parents etc etc... You are going to end up online without knowing.

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 3 points 2 years ago

Naa, I'll take my ...

[$52M ÷ 30 Billion]

... $0.0017 check please. Don't forget postage.