670
submitted 6 months ago by Wilshire@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 316 points 6 months ago

I would have never seen this picture if she hadn't done this.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 150 points 6 months ago
[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 41 points 6 months ago

Yikes, Barbra really let herself go.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 18 points 6 months ago

No, you're thinking of Kristen Bell who is the "let it go" lady. Streisand is the one who famously lost out on Worst Actress to Kristen Stewart for her role in The Guilt Trip, in which she played the unbelievably original role of "obnoxious Jewish mother."

She also released at least one musical album back in the 1900s and appeared in a few movies.

One such movie included Streisand portraying the daughter of a disappointed rabbi who also questions her father's ability to hear her.

[-] flubba86@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Kristen Bell played Anna in Frozen, did not sing "Let it go". That was by Elsa, played by Idina Menzel.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 9 points 6 months ago

You talking about the wick-edly talented... Adele Dazeem?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 33 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

And even those who saw it would have seen it in the context of a lot of other portraits in the same style, where it doesn’t stand out as anything personally directed at Rinehart.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] coaxil@lemm.ee 133 points 6 months ago
[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 105 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
[-] RIPandTERROR@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 months ago

I'm in fuckin tears

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] oehm@midwest.social 110 points 6 months ago

Another case of the Streisand effect

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] Draegur@lemm.ee 77 points 6 months ago

if she weren't rich, i'd feel bad for her. her status and authority, unfortunately, make her an acceptable target for nonviolent criticism, such as really ugly portraits.

[-] SuperApples@lemmy.world 59 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

her status and authority, unfortunately, make her an acceptable target

Agreed, but It's really more that she's a complete arsehole. As a nimby mining magnate, she is a sponsor of organised climate denialism and vocal about it herself, a race she clearly has a horse in. She's also an active libertarian who wants to further dismantle the welfare system, and reduce taxation, and wants Australian workers to be cool like Africans and work for $2 a day. And a vocal Trump supporter.

It's not the painting that makes her ugly, it's her behaviour and ideology.

[-] Draegur@lemm.ee 19 points 6 months ago

it's her behavior and ideology that makes the painting accurate :3

[-] answersplease77@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's crazy to me how ~~most if not~~ all billionares cheerish exploiting poor wages and keeping poor people poorer while hoarding unimaginable wealth that's enough for lifetime for generations of their family. That's because billionares are mentally sick.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Fisk400@feddit.nu 33 points 6 months ago

It's not uglier than the other portraits in the set. Its really weird that she would object when she is sharing a wall with royalty.

[-] kaffiene@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago

Regardless of her money, she's an ugly individual. And I don't mean physically

Yeah, I was going to say I'm not Australian, so I'm not super familiar with her, but from what I do know of her, this portrait seems fitting.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.ml 55 points 6 months ago

Rinehart has an estimated net worth of $30.2 billion USD, according to Forbes.

Piece of shit.

[-] kaffiene@lemmy.world 31 points 6 months ago

She is a piece of shit, and not just because she's a billionaire

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

Yeah, mining magnate basically means she's rich cause her father's company has raped the earth using labor they paid pennies for while those who actually did all the work are likely living in abject poverty.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 53 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

She is basically the Koch brothers, but bigger, dumber, and more evil.

The only reason why the Koch family is probably worse, is because their influence flows through the American state.

All this is to say, it's a good bet that after this story dies down, the gallery will quietly acquiesce and take down the painting. This will either be followed by a carrot, or a removal of whatever stick she used.

[-] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 52 points 6 months ago

If there ever was an example of the Streisand effect, this is it!

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 47 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Man... You could just fucking own it and be far better off in every way. Just speaks to the crazy ego these people have.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] kingshrubb@lemmy.world 47 points 6 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] itsmect@monero.town 47 points 6 months ago

Only commenting to give this post even more engagement, lol

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 33 points 6 months ago

I will never not appreciate the Streisand effect.

[-] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 28 points 6 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 27 points 6 months ago

This is the image.

wantja Arts/Vincent Namatjira/Copyright Agency/Getty Images

[-] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 24 points 6 months ago

Maybe she could buy the painting? I'm sure the artist would be willing to part with it for a donation of a few billion to charitable causes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 23 points 6 months ago

My initial reaction was that it was probably unflattering on purpose but after seeing the others I think that might just be the artist's style and she just has an unfortunate face for it.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 22 points 6 months ago

I think it's a pretty accurate drawing, seems like art to me.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] dumbass@leminal.space 19 points 6 months ago

Ahhh yes, good, shame that racist fat cunt globally.

[-] MrShankles@reddthat.com 18 points 6 months ago

She'd have done better claiming, "It doesn't even look like me‽ Kind of a shit artist imo, if we're all just being honest."

Apparently, there's no going back from the Streisand effect. And now, here we all are, looking at her actual gremlin face... understanding that the painting is somehow true. She should have let it go

[-] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

The article could have ended after the very first sentence.

Art is subjective.

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I think it's funny how on .ml I can't call this woman a bitch, but I can say I want to cut off her head and eat her liver.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

As Australia's only Barbi-llionaire, I vote to replace her portrait with a funny portrait of me in the exhibition instead.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 8 points 6 months ago

I have seen stories on this topic posted several times. I upvote it every time and will continue to do so.

[-] chemicalprophet@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago

Best of luck. Get back under your bridge! Shoo!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
670 points (98.1% liked)

World News

39019 readers
722 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS