438
Imagination rule (lemmy.world)

Alt text: Using AI is the coolest new way to let people know you have no imagination of your own

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 80 points 6 months ago

As much as I have issues with AI, I feel like it would actually help you get your imagination set down in a way you could actually show people? Like I can think of a wonderful scene in my head, but I can't even draw a straight line with a ruler and you want me to draw that scene? Hell no, and lack of ability isn't lack of imagination, it's just a skill issue.

[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 26 points 6 months ago

Drawing however is a vital part of the creative process. Creativity is not only about getting your mental image on paper, but also to learn and hone your limits as an artist.

Bob Ross said that stuff about "happy little accidents" for a reason.

[-] onion@feddit.de 21 points 6 months ago

Trust me there are a lot of accidents with AI generators

[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 10 points 6 months ago

But they're never interesting. It's never due to some human factor, but always a "huh, I guess the stochastic model doesn't work properly."

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] voracitude@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

So a ~~paraplegic~~ quadriplegic can't be creative? 🤔

Or, let me rephrase because this is a serious question testing the limits of your statement: what impact would you say being ~~a paraplegic~~ unable to perform basic motor functions has on someone's ability to create art, given that (according to you) they cannot perform such critical parts of the creative process?

[-] Kachilde@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Well first off, most paraplegics still have use of their arms, so drawing should not be a problem there.

Quadriplegics have access to digital interfaces and there are many example of an artists who use their mouths to paint. Henry Salas has lost function in 90% of his body and has been a digital artist for over a decade. https://www.henrysalas.com/digital-art

[-] voracitude@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Well first off, most paraplegics still have use of their arms, so drawing should not be a problem there

Lol fair enough, my bad, I'm still shaking off the sleep, I did mean quadriplegics!

So then in this view it's not just using your extremities to create art, but any part of your body, which is a crucial part of the process. Your mouth, a foot, a nostril - all valid bodily extensions to interface with the world and create "real art" with.

But language is another interface between someone's mind and the world; why is that not a valid extension to create art with? What about people who generate their AI art piecemeal, using inpainting and careful prompting to correct features they don't want? What about professional photographers using their existing knowledge of photography to create award-winning compositions entirely with AI? Is it fair to say these people have no imagination?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 6 points 6 months ago

The issue is when people use chatgpt or whatever to form a reply for them, like i get that people can't draw hence cannot implement said imagination, but...word? It doesn't have to be fancy, just type out what they have in mind. It happened right in Lemmy as well.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 62 points 6 months ago

AI art is real art because people get mad at it

[-] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago

AI art is real art because people made it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] voracitude@lemmy.world 47 points 6 months ago

Okay. I write lyrics and have Suno turn them into full songs to make wife laugh. My wife laughs. But according to you I don't have any imagination because I'm not a multivocal singer, can't play any instruments, don't have my own band to play for her on demand? Fuck off.

[-] tb_@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

For personal use I see little issue with it. If you, however, start publishing them, suppressing other voices and/or making money off of it, it becomes less clear.

[-] voracitude@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

Well, I've shared my creations because I think they're funny too, and maybe other people will, but I'm not gonna put them on an album and sell them! I'm just arguing the creative side of it. Those tracks wouldn't exist without my lyrics, and I typically go through a bunch of "takes" to get the melodies and rhythms I want, so for someone to say there's no imagination involved feels thoroughly unfair to me.

[-] essell@lemmy.world 40 points 6 months ago

They're a replacement for skills and knowledge, not imagination.

This is why people point out that they lack skills and knowledge.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 6 months ago

I understand not liking AI but you don't have to be a jerk to aphantasics to do it

[-] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 15 points 6 months ago

That and you need to be pretty imaginative to get some nice results from prompts

[-] androogee@midwest.social 16 points 6 months ago

"boobs big tits heavy chesticles smothering me to death"

Nice

[-] FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

The modern Leonardo da vinci, ladies and gentlemen

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago

I prefer to do it the old fashioned way:

[-] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 21 points 6 months ago

who needs imagination when you have algorithms to do the thinking for you? 😜


This was chat GPTs attempt at writing a funny reply to this post.

[-] Anamana@feddit.de 8 points 6 months ago

'Write me a reply, that gets upvoted by the Lemmy OG IT bubble' ;)

[-] RagnarokOnline@programming.dev 10 points 6 months ago

GPT: “What’s Lemmy, lol”

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Halosheep@lemm.ee 21 points 6 months ago

I've had some really cool image ideas I would have never been able to create myself, so take your artist elitism and shove it.

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago
[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

Restoftheowl.jpg

[-] arisunz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 6 months ago

lmao the proompter cope in this thread is real

[-] FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Maybe other people just enjoy something and there's no reason to put them down for it. I wish I knew something you enjoyed so I could make fun of you for it. Sad person.

[-] arisunz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 6 months ago

ah yes im so very sorry, i should have kept the feelings of people who gladly feed on stolen labor and exploitation of the global south for their slop generator to work, in mind uwu

fuck outta here lmaoo

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] crispyflagstones@sh.itjust.works 18 points 6 months ago

Look up what people used to say about digital art and tell me if history repeats itself or not

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

I was actually there. The backlash against digital art usually came from:

  • people who were otherwise already elittist towards one or two painting styles and media,
  • art gallery regulars (they can't sell JPEGs or PSDs),
  • poor people as back then graphics tablets were way more expensive and alternatives to Wacom also worse (the patents for their battery-free pens haven't expired yet), thus it was cheaper to buy paint and/or markers.
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Ballistic_86@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

I’m pro AI at this point. Any use it has in the real world have and will continue regardless if AI art somehow gets restricted. AI is choosing who gets jobs, doing the work previously done by humans, and companies will continue this trend.

Being able to create art that is good and makes someone money is already a 1% kinda thing (I don’t mean money-wise, I mean just the ability to earn money as an artist at all). If we can’t save the rest of humanity, artists are just going to have to join us.

[-] arisunz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 6 months ago

the indomitable human spirit: nuh uh :3

[-] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works 17 points 6 months ago

The reality is 99% of people that create images or music have little to no real creativity, it's far higher for text.

You can be crazily creative with thrown paint and make images you can stare at for hours or you can do the most generic shit with a hundred brushes and 12 years of art education.

Of course a creative person can use ai in fascinating ways to create visually stunning images. The better tools get the more control we have over output and the more intricate and ¹complex the things we'll make. I've seen loads of really cool things from ai which are every bit as creative as anything else, as with all art you have to seek out creativity and originality.

[-] moonburster@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

I believe that people with a good imagination actually make use of Ai better, they can generate way more interesting prompts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] germanatlas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 6 months ago

Excuse me, I have no imagination but I don’t resort to AI

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago
[-] jaschen@lemm.ee 9 points 6 months ago

I use it to kickstart my email replies. I'm a great editor but terrible at creating from scratch.

[-] buzz86us@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

I like these apps to help me come up with ideas for different story concepts.

[-] NoFood4u@sopuli.xyz 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

ChatGPT is great for yapping about patriotism for a school history essay, but It's completely unable to write anything useful or sensible. So I'll keep on doing things like art, storywriting and programming myself, but I'll use whatever cheats I have available for the pointless things I'm forced to do.

[-] vale@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 months ago

Jokes on you, I don't need AI to tell me that. I couldn't make a good build in Minecraft if you held me at gunpoint.

[-] kinsnik@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

there is a lot of nuance in the discussion, but a lot of people just want a quick black and white answer. you can use AI to supplement other artistic projects (like using AI to create images for a comic you wrote), so i don't agree with the premise of the post

but i also don't agree with people who say that AI is just another tool. i think that it is a paradigm changing tool, that is going to make us have to rethink how we interact with art.

[-] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

The ability to speak doesn't mean you're intelligent.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago

You can do wild shit that's barely possible with any other tools.

You can feed in images instead of text, or alongside it, and turn blobby sketches into photoreal renders.

You can describe contradictory nonsense and get a decent effort to square the circle.

You can keep saying more, more, more, and get exaggerations revealing an adjective's visual essence.

... but yeah, folks keep posting "woman naked anime" five hundred brainless images at a time. So few people are even making comics with this shit. Do they not understand each panel is its own little drawing? You piece together what you need. Story exists in the edit. Not even the people with a paragraph of "Remember, if you lose--" dialog in ev-er-y fucking image have figured out they can just show that now.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
438 points (100.0% liked)

196

16444 readers
1881 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS