87

During an appearance on the network, Pelosi touted President Biden’s record on the economy, saying, he “created 9 million jobs in his term in office. Donald Trump has the worst record of job loss of any president. So we just have to make sure people know.”

Host Katy Tur briefly interjected, telling Pelosi “there was a global pandemic” during Trump’s presidency.

Pelosi paused, looking shocked, before shooting back at Tur that “he had the worst record of any president. We’ve had other concerns in our country.”

“If you want to be an apologist for Donald Trump, that may be your role, but it ain’t mine,” she added.

top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 51 points 2 months ago

A global pandemic which he facilitated by removing the pandemic response team (although it was underfunded before), he downplayed it publicly, promoted false remedies, etc, etc, etc.

He (and his administration) had every chance to reduce the impact and he didn’t. It’s bc he's arrogant and stupid. He cost jobs but more importantly a lot of lives.

[-] A_Filthy_Weeaboo@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

I hold him responsible for all the needless death that occurred during Covid

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

As you should. He was worse than incompetent, he actively made it much worse.

And the CDC just folding under him like that. Sad and infuriating.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 2 months ago

My dad got radicalized toward Trump because of how the media constantly attacked him. It was his terrible handling of Covid that made him reject him by the time he was out.

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Honestly, I think this is the only reason Biden won in 2020. Trump once said he was like a war time president with the pandemic. If he had kept that mentality and rallied to battle it, I think he would have won. However, I'm not sure which scenario is worse in the long term... I suppose the darkest timeline is yet to be seen. If Trump wins in November, we will truly be in the darkest timeline.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

Tur is definitely either a right leaning sympathizer or at least a bothsides believer and has been for a while.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Trump used to single her out and had the crowds boo her when she covered his campaign.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Sounds like everyone hates her.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 2 months ago

Retire and let the younger generations have some power already.

[-] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

At least she gave up House speakership. Her constituents need to primary her. Last time her Dem opponent got 22% of the vote...and forget about the Rep

[-] chemicalprophet@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago

Just between us inside traders, she's prolly right...

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I mean.. was she?

Found the clip, judge/ read for yourselves:

https://youtu.be/Ih0QTIa4uhQ?si=IUrQBqReE-i9uD1a&t=706

Reaction: No Tur, was not being an apologist, she was just putting something out there as a matter of historicity and Pelosi took reality personally.

[-] Kid_Thunder@kbin.social 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Starts at 12:55 for anyone that wants to get right to it.

Though Pelosi should have taken this as an opportunity to talk about how poorly Trump handled the epidemic and promoted false information instead of taking the childish and weak way out of personally attacking her for making the point their opponents always make.

Frankly, Pelosi's saddling both sides but still criticizing pro-Palestinian -- or perhaps I should say, pro-Humanitarian protestors was weak and propagandizing. She basically said 'I don't hear them considering the Hamas who are terrorists' when obviously they have and it is a tired irrelevant counter-point when the issue here is the actual innocents, including many women, children and aid workers; as well as the blockade of humanitarian efforts and lack of accountability from the US to Israel.

She did a bad job here on both points, IMO. There's no reason we couldn't fund our ally while putting constraints on it like "you have to do x, y and z while reducing collateral damage to x and following LOAC while allowing UN inspectors at their discretion" but even if that's done now, I think it is too late as far as history will be concerned. This will be a black mark. Though we should do the right thing now and save as many innocent lives as possible and broker peace (which we also aren't doing).

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

There’s no reason we couldn’t fund our ally while putting constraints on it like “you have to do x, y and z while reducing collateral damage to x and following LOAC while allowing UN inspectors at their discretion”

Oh, there's a reason. "We don't want to" is a reason.

[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago

For those of you not in the know, Pelosi is best known for her defense of insider trading as being her right as Speaker of the House, amongst other things

[-] anticolonialist@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago

She needs to fade into obscurity like Clinton does.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

You're going to need more precise pronouns there.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I don't think they were talking about Tur.

this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
87 points (87.8% liked)

politics

18081 readers
1531 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS