163
Millions rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

I'm sorry for the bad rule, but rule number rule rule.

EDIT: I'm glad people like and are discussing the post. For the record though, I posted this for the funny number lol

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago

Should be a high percentage of profits or even revenue.

[-] stembolts@programming.dev 20 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Percentage of gross annual earnings from the year of the crime.

0-100% sliding scale decided by a judge based on crime severity.

Let the public veto the fine (back to a new judge) via referendum if they deem it too lenient. Rinse and repeat. Let the public get some punches in because corps have been swinging down at us for over a century.

The fact that this is "too democratic" to be realistic is a sign of the times, imo.

[-] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

The offenses that can only be committed by the rich against the poor are never criminal. Unless the rich get screwed over too, there's never any jail time.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago

Trump’s FCC appointees voted in favor of massive corporations having no punishment or accountability for being shitty?

this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
163 points (100.0% liked)

196

16419 readers
1763 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS