232
submitted 6 months ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Since January, Dr. Stacy Seyb, a maternal-fetal medicine specialist in Boise, Idaho, has had at least four of his patients wheeled onto emergency flights and airlifted out of the state while experiencing severe pregnancy complications.

One of them was a woman whose water broke around 20 weeks into her pregnancy, putting her at risk of infection. In these types of emergencies, ending the patient’s pregnancy can be part of the standard of care. But doctors at the hospital where Seyb works say they have been forced to transfer patients who have these complications out of state to comply with the state’s abortion ban.

“This has become the new normal, which is sad,” he said.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Drusas@kbin.run 83 points 6 months ago

Spoiler alert: It's so they don't die because Idaho won't let doctors take care of pregnant patients.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 30 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's all stemming from their abortion ban. It's causing massive problems for the entire northern part of their state.

It's not just cases like this... They are losing doctors like crazy, and shutting down maternity wards.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 38 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

In a news conference after Wednesday's arguments, Idaho Attorney General Raúl Labrador, a Republican, questioned accounts of doctors’ transferring patients. “It’s really hard for me to conceive of a single instance where a woman has to be airlifted out of Idaho to perform an abortion,” he said.

Oh never mind guys, I'm sure it was just a misunderstanding. Or maybe several... misunderstandings.

[-] aniki@lemm.ee 11 points 6 months ago

Lawyer criminal turned politician doesn't know medical science -- shocking!

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago

Idaho. The Florida of the north.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

Similar dick shape, even narrower dick.

[-] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 months ago

Ohio sends their regards.

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago

Failed state

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 15 points 6 months ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago

His worshipers are the reason women are in this mess.

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Worse-ipers

[-] SitD@feddit.de 2 points 6 months ago

yeah but think about the mess the pro lifers would be in if their wishes weren't fulfilled. it must be a humanitarian desaster 😭

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

"What other medical condition can we think of that would require a patient who’s sick to get transported to another state for a legal reason?” Hayer told NBC News. “It just really feels unjust.”

I had a similar problem in January... Went to the ER short of breath, we were thinking it was a complication from a prescription change. Had a heart attack IN the ER.

That hospital, the one closest to me, could do the angiogram, but they didn't have the capability to do the stent, I would need an ambulance to get me to a different hospital for the stent...

In the middle of an ice storm.

https://www.wweek.com/news/city/2024/01/22/911-was-inundated-with-calls-for-medical-help-during-the-ice-storm/

Because the ambulance system was overloaded, it took 2 extra nights to get me to the 2nd hospital. During one of those overnights, my heart stopped for 8 seconds.

Every hospital, and I mean EVERY HOSPITAL, should have basic capacity for common treatments like abortions and heart stents.

When I needed an emergency room again on Tuesday, we skipped that hospital entirely and drove an extra 40 minutes to get to "the good one".

[-] pastabatman@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

I'm sorry for what you experienced, but that isn't the same thing at all. Not every hospital has advanced capabilities. There aren't enough specialists to staff them, and even if there were small population centers wouldn't have the number of patients needed to sustain the costs associated with those advanced capabilities. Transferring patients to different hospitals for a higher level of care is extremely common.

The article is talking about a situation where the hospital has the capability to provide the appropriate care, but can't for legal reasons. In that scenario having to transfer a patient out of state is ridiculous, wasteful, and unsafe.

[-] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 months ago

Every time I hear about Idaho it gets worse ffs. I hope my nieces can get the fuck out of there when they're old enough

[-] bl_r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 months ago

As if healthcare wasn’t expensive enough

this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
232 points (98.7% liked)

News

23301 readers
1397 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS