154
submitted 7 months ago by shreddy_scientist@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 79 points 7 months ago

I’m a little out of the loop, but I recall Audacity took a massive nose dive a while ago. Have they recovered from this?

In particular, the cloud features doesn’t pass the smell test for me. Is this one of those apps where you download the old version?

[-] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 54 points 7 months ago

It's still going but I think a good chunk of the FOSS community avoids it. Distros that still ships it disable the telemetry.

Definitely feels like the desperate attempts to monetize it, and the enshittification that typically arises next.

As far as I know it's still fine to use if your distro disables the telemetry, which is what most people had issues with. It's still under the same license in the end, which is probably why they're now pivoting to cloud features: that they can make proprietary. I'm sure cloud-based AI plugins are next.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

On the one hand they should be paid for there work. On the other hand that's not the right way to get paid for work.

They should ask for donations and sell cool merch

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 21 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

that’s not that right way to get paid

I don't know a whole lot about what Audacity is up to these days, but the same company owns MuseScore, and it sounds like they're doing kinda similar things in terms of monetisation. The core software itself is still free, but there are optional cloud services on top of that which you can pay for.

I don't see what's wrong with this. Cloud services provide a convenience. Some people like that convenience and are willing to pay for it. Others might be perfectly ok doing it themselves and won't pay.

It helps that the new head of design for both of these products is a guy who really knows his shit. He's already taken MuseScore from an application that nobody in their right mind would use if they could afford the commercial competitors, to a legitimately great music engraving application, and he's been on Audacity too since 2021.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 8 points 7 months ago

The problem lies in the fact that these services are completely proprietary and are an example of service as a software substitute.

Foss should encourage privacy and freedom. Cloud storage doesn't normally do that. What's worse it it often requires non free libraries to be included which is a no no

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 7 months ago

Foss should encourage privacy and freedom. Cloud storage doesn’t normally do that.

Then don't use it? It's that simple. If it makes money for them and some users like it, there's nothing wrong with that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

It helps that the new head of design for both of these products is a guy who really knows his shit. He's already taken MuseScore from an application that nobody in their right mind would use if they could afford the commercial competitors, to a legitimately great music engraving application, and he's been on Audacity too since 2021.

I tried Audacity before that and couldn't migrate from adobe's aquired CoolEditPro (Au versions before modern redesign). Have it changed much since then? I'm yet to find an alternative (video editing tools just doesn't make it, although they get recommended) and as I can recall Audacity had an interface that's not as easy to use.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 4 points 7 months ago

I couldn't tell you for sure, because I don't use it or its commercial competition very much. That said, personally when I have needed to use it, I've always found the gap between Audacity and its pro equivalents in terms of basic usability to be much lower than in other creative fields. GIMP, in particular, is nigh unusable compared to Photoshop.

If you're interested in seeing more, here's a video where the new lead announced that he was taking it over. And the official Audacity YouTube channel has been posting overviews of its updates since then. I think it likely that the first two updates (3.1 and 3.2) contain some of the most critical functionality.

[-] leopold@lemmy.kde.social 2 points 6 months ago

Audacity doesn't come anywhere close to professional DAWs like Audition and it's not really trying to be one afaik. Ardour is the way to go for professional needs.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 7 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

here's a video where the new lead announced that he was taking it over

the official Audacity YouTube channel

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 6 points 7 months ago

So what free alternative would you suggest?

[-] smpl@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 7 months ago
[-] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

Aww I was just about gush about how awesome they've been all these years. Guess I haven't really kept up to date. I mean it doesn't sound like it's gone totally to shit, but just clearly embarking on a path straight in to the shit

[-] Gerudo@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

I had no idea about these updates. Which distros are clean?

[-] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 4 points 7 months ago

Arch is, not sure about the others. I would imagine Debian also is.

Versions 3.0+ of Audacity are affected. It's not like it's malware and unclean but they did add telemetry and crash reporting and stuff.

[-] nyan@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

Gentoo specifically switches off the telemetry (-Daudacity_has_sentry_reporting=off,-Daudacity_has_crashreports=off). The cloud saving facility is also off by default, but can be added to the build by enabling the audiocom USE flag.

[-] Dirk@lemmy.ml 10 points 7 months ago

It's still spyware, but people do not care anymore.

[-] troed@fedia.io 42 points 7 months ago
[-] Dirk@lemmy.ml 18 points 7 months ago

Yes, exactly. Even worse that people do not care about Audacity being spyware since a good fork exists.

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 3 points 7 months ago

Thanks for the tip! Will definitely consider this when I need to edit some audio.

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 0 points 7 months ago

But Tenacity had its last release 5 months ago. Audacity too? I had the feeling they diverge a lot

[-] Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 months ago

I might be wrong, but I remember reading that they removed the objectionable content after the fuss that was kicked up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 32 points 7 months ago

Why does it need cloud saving?

[-] woodgen@lemm.ee 30 points 7 months ago

So other people have your data.

[-] scottmeme@sh.itjust.works 21 points 7 months ago

Friendship with audacity ended a while ago, nobody needs cloud saving for this at ALL. Go download tenacity instead.

[-] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 16 points 6 months ago

Shout-out to Tenacity, forked when Audacity got bought out and started heading down a dark path.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 months ago

I'd be happy if I could just "hide" a section of audio without needing to delete it. I'm often trying to shorten musical pieces and having a way to hide/unhide a section would be so much easier than relying on delete/undo.

[-] pinchcramp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 months ago
[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

The "smart clips?" Not quite... They're only at the end of a clip to shorten it. I need to make multiple cuts in the middle.

[-] pinchcramp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago

Ah, I think that isn't possible. You would have to split the track and then use the smart clips feature. Or you use a different tool like someone else mentioned.

[-] FQQD@lemmy.ohaa.xyz 6 points 7 months ago

Unrelated question, but what's the DE in the screenshot? Looks super clean

[-] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago

Gnome with the dock-to-panel extension.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 7 months ago

It looks like Gnome.

Just speculation, but Deepin?

[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 3 points 7 months ago

Does Audacity still only work with ALSA? Wish they'd use at least pulse if not pipewire...

[-] circular@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago

I've been using Audacity with PulseAudio for quite a while now and it works fine for me. I sometimes find myself tweaking volumes in PulseAudio on the side.

[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 1 points 7 months ago

Can it also record from Pulse?

[-] circular@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

Late reply, but yes. You can mix and match to record from Pulse but playback to ALSA too (or the other way around) but I think using Pulse for both makes more sense.

[-] palitu@aussie.zone 2 points 7 months ago

Yeah, save to audio.com. I was hoping to personal cloud storage, S3 compatible or similar. But maybe not. I didn't check on audio.com pricing though

[-] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago

Didn't Audacity already have pitch shifting? Or did they improve the algorithm? If the latter is true, this is very exciting to me

this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
154 points (94.8% liked)

Linux

48247 readers
510 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS