this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
1017 points (98.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

9387 readers
3030 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bunnylux@lemmy.world 72 points 2 years ago (3 children)

To those who believe that learning is its own end, like me, I don't see any problems with this.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 74 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's really great, as long as you don't need shelter or to eat.

[–] aesopjah@lemm.ee 43 points 2 years ago (5 children)

that's low key why universal basic income would be good. it's somewhat important to have people like that who just want to preserve and teach history and they shouldn't necessarily be forced to find an industrialized application for that in order to have a decent life.

[–] vaquedoso@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

But my bootstraps!

[–] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I don’t think UBI helps with this much. This might be controversial to hear, but UBI solves different problems related to fulfilling needs and doesn’t solve problems with incentives inherently. So if studying history is on par with doing no work at all, then a history major will only be able to afford the new ground floor of our society.

What would probably be better is to fix our grant systems and provide destinations for studying history. So UBI allows anyone to study it but grants still encourage people to do so and gives them a destination to work towards.

[–] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

2000 year from now, they'll still be studying empty tombs in Egypt. except the "grave robbers" that took everything were the archeologists of today, instead of the archaeologists of the 7th century.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zink@programming.dev 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don’t see a problem with it if the person can afford it.

But if you’re a young person starting with nothing, starting your life in tremendous debt that won’t increase your earnings is going to be rough. It doesn’t make you a bad person or anything, but if you went and got a a job and read about Egypt in the library, you might be a much happier, less stressed person in 5-10 years.

[–] Gabu@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Easy solution: be born in the civilized world. Higher education is pretty much free, now!

[–] Zink@programming.dev 10 points 2 years ago

cries in freedom and bullets

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This isn't one of those pyramid schemes you've heard about. We use a different model - the trapezoid!

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago (4 children)

There’s a joke in the industry:

Q: Whats the first thing an egyptology major says when he graduates?

A: You want fries with that?

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Back when I was a philosophy grad student there was a joke going around:

The head of the chemisty department goes to the dean and asks for money to buy some new lab equipment. The dean shakes his head and goes, "No, you are asking too much here. Why can't you be more like the physics department? All they ask for in their budget is pencil and rubbers... or better yet the philosophy department - all they ask for is pencils!"

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

note for our US readers: A rubber is an eraser.

[–] helpme@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Naw, it's a condom, physicists fuck.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Oh whoops, lol. Thanks!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] supercritical@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Those who can, do. Those who can’t, teach.

A phrase that would bounce around when I was in grad school.

[–] wintermutehal@lemmy.world 48 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I find this phrase rather demeaning. I am a damn good Instructional Designer, but I would eventually like to teach this to others.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

Well, do while you can do. After that, you can teach?

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

As someone who fakes their way through life and can't teach, it's also demeaning to me. I don't know what I'm doing, can't really do it, and certainly shouldn't be teaching anyone else.

[–] MrClayman@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I also find it demeaning. I can do so much, but I CHOOSE to teach.

Maybe I shouldn’t teach anymore.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] snooggums@midwest.social 34 points 2 years ago

The saying sucks because it implies that they tried doing something in the private field and failed into teaching. Most teachers went directly into teaching, so they succeeded.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It’s a dumb saying. Teaching is harder than many jobs

[–] mcmoor@bookwormstory.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well you don't need to be good at teaching to be a teacher

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

You could say that about many jobs, especially ones that don’t offer competitive wages. I have had quite a few different jobs and there are always people that have no business holding the role they do.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Usually said by angry types who never did either one.

[–] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Yeah that's so out of context that it speaks to the intelligence of students repeating it. It came from the old trades and people retiring into teaching after they literally couldn't do it anymore, not that they weren't once capable. Very similar to the "Bad apples" quote.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Hey that's what I did with philosophy. It's great to adjunct for three universities and get no health care. Definitely worth it!!

[–] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Maybe philosophy is so needlessly wordy and impenetrable because it's just people that weren't smart enough to see it as a dead end trained enough to make it seem esoteric and meaningful, to keep their heads just above water and their hands on books instead of chef knives.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Maybe philosophy is so needlessly wordy and impenetrable because it’s just people that weren’t smart enough to see it as a dead end

Quite a few philosophy undergrounds go on to law, business, and marketing, because the underlying concepts tie so well together. Lots of philosophy grad CEOs and heads of Law Firms. Some of the richest people in the country majored in philosophy.

Egyptology is significantly more niche. But it should be noted that we used to have a significant amount of money going towards archeological research. That's money state governments and private institutions have pulled back fairly recently.

We get to play this game with a lot of niche professions. There's a huge demand from back in, say, the 80s or 90s and then a huge structural shift to stop doing astrological research or civil engineering or sociology or education or whatever. All the money gets dumped into state subsidies for bitcoin miners. And then we call the folks who matriculated through those real professions "stupid" while smugly insisting the future is in digitally jerking ourselves off.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Chef here. We don't want philosophy majors playing with our knives or fire, thanks. The alcoholics, potheads, and methheads are enough to contend with without someone that really over thinks things.

[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

As somebody with a PhD in the subject, there's some truth to this. Ever read Derrida or Deleuze? Some of thise continental guys are especially full of shit.

I still love the subject, though. When else do you get to just think about the big topics and work through fun arguments about them? We'd all be poorer if nobody did that.

[–] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

"If those people believed half of what they wrote, they'd have shot themselves years ago." My dad, who may have been more of a philosopher than he realized.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Naw, all that matters is making money. Don't bother thinking about big, important things. Just know your place, keep your head down, and crank out $$$.

[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I didn't know the disembodied voice of capitalism stalked Lemmy, too!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

what is a pyramid but a temporarily embarrassed disk

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Tangentially, shout out to Dominic Perry's History of Egypt podcast. Great stuff, very engaging without forgetting that history is an evolving and ever-incomplete field of study, and that things other than battles happened in the ancient world.

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It took me way too long (into my adult years) to figure out that an Egyptologist is an archaeologist who specializes in ancient Egyptian cultural artifacts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nifty@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

If he’s paying for his PhD, then that’s definitely a scam

[–] Ginger666@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

It's a reverse funnel system.

Get real.

maybach music

[–] Ilflish@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I'm not really sure how much empathy I have for this. I'm aware in the US you don't pick a major until a year in but even when you don't people, were ready to invest in subjects they knew would leave them with few job opportunities. They thought it was cool and wanted to go to university. Finding a job was a future problem. I was not and won't be anti-arts and humanities but they are just as popular, if not more so then many other subjects in universities and 90% of them know that it's a difficult field to find any work in

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A friend got a degree in Egyptology, only to realize that after she’d sunk in the time to get a master’s on the advice of her professors, that they were ensuring their livelihood by overselling the job prospects.
After a few years of low level museum jobs, she got her doctorate and became an Egyptology professor. Her hope is to one day become an Egyptologist, but I think she’s already in a gilded academic cage and doesn’t realize it.

[–] SrTobi@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sounds like she is a saleswoman for Egyptolgogy now too

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mango@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Are there no ologists for other places?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›