231
submitted 1 year ago by Hydrogen to c/android

TL;DR: Apple dominates the US smartphone market, but EU regulations may offer Android a chance for resurgence by enforcing messaging interoperability and standardizing hardware features.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tja@sh.itjust.works 161 points 1 year ago

This is so funny for someone from Europe. Nobody I know cares what phone you have.

And everyone is using chat apps, mostly WhatsApp or signal, so everybody has the same great chatting experience.

[-] ExLisper@linux.community 52 points 1 year ago

Said like someone who can't afford an iPhone...

Just kidding, I use Samsung myself. It's crazy how easy it is to brainwash Americans into worshiping their corporate gods. Couple of good ads and they will die for their brand or choice.

[-] Zron@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

My wife was bullied into getting an iPhone because of her colleagues, and they were buy one get one free, so now I have one too.

It’s a phone, I’m happy

[-] 30p87@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago

buy one get one free

Still got scammed, arguably lmao

[-] henfredemars 7 points 1 year ago

People get so hostile over such things. I have an iPhone for business. I have a Pixel for my personal use. They're alright. It depends on what you need. Still a smartphone enthusiast.

[-] steltek@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ugh, sounds like some of my coworkers and MacBooks. Then you discover that MacBooks are seriously crippled compared to the Linux machine you were using and you get told one of:

  1. "What do you mean by $feature? I've never heard of that."
  2. "Why would you want to do that?"
  3. Run a badly performing Linux VM in a janky hypervisor to do that
  4. Pay $10 for this little 3rd party app to fix the problem

Throw in some serious RSI pain from that tire fire of a keyboard and yeah, I have no idea why I switched.

Edit: Work machine. No way I'd pay for Apple with my own money.

[-] BoredomAddict@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I'm stuck working on a MacBook too and it's horrendous. I plug it into a monitor and use a good keyboard, but it'll never be useful as a portable computer with that garbage keyboard

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] UsernameIsTooLon@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Americans are all about status symbols and knowing names. Runs in our eagle screeching capitalist blood.

[-] MostlyGibberish@lemm.ee 46 points 1 year ago

It's rough in the US. Most iPhone users will insist that iMessage is better and refuse to use anything else, and then whine when an android user is in a group chat and none of the features work.

[-] EssentialCoffee@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago

I have several group chats with both android & iPhone users. No one complains. The only place I hear about people complaining is the Internet, never anyone in the wild.

[-] randomaccount43543@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes. Everybody and their grandma in Spain (at least) is using WhatsApp.

[-] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 year ago

Thank you. Based EU citizens genuinely carrying the US on this issue, and we are looking forward to removable batteries.

[-] hihellobyeoh@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Some modern phones still have removable batteries,, like my Motorola e5 play, its quite useful if the phone locks up bad, I can pop the battery out to restart it.

[-] giant_smeeg@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah same here

UK. I'll get the odd joke from an iPhone user but we all use WhatsApp and no one really cares.

[-] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Try to use something that's something other than iOS or Android with Google services.

(I'm daily driving deGoogled Android, I can live, but just can get sick of all the pressure around world is taking on not having Google Play Store)

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 55 points 1 year ago

This is such a weird headline. I'm not switching to Apple and know tons of people who also would never do that. Most people don't care about blue vs. green chat bubbles, except for those who just use their iPhone as a status symbol.

Sure, messaging needs to get fixed, and I hope the EU pushes Apple towards open standards. But it's not like there aren't a ton of android manufacturers who are making money hand over fist on devices.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

Look at the iMessage saga; Apple insists on treating Android owners like second-class citizens in group texts. Android owners can’t enjoy many modern messaging features with iPhone owners, such as high-quality media sharing, read receipts, and more.

Are WhatsApp, Telegram, Discord, Signal, and such blocked in the US? What's with that whining about iMessage?

[-] paintbucketholder@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

Are WhatsApp, Telegram, Discord, Signal, and such blocked in the US?

Of course they're not blocked.

People just default to the app that comes pre-installed with their phone and sits right there on the first screen, because it's marginally easier than picking a third party app in the App Store, installing it, and creating an account.

It's the exact same argument that Microsoft made when they bundled Internet Explorer with their OS.

[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

People just default to the app that comes pre-installed with their phone

Cannot confirm this is the case with messaging apps in the EU. Nobody uses iMessage and nobody uses whatever the current Google thing is each year. WhatsApp is dominat despite not being preinstalled on any major phone brand (certainly not Samsung and Apple).

[-] paintbucketholder@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Apples to oranges.

The reason is that messaging services like WhatsApp became popular in Europe because carriers charged exorbitant fees for SMS messaging at a time when no single phone manufacturer absolutely dominated the market. Apps like WhatsApp made it possible to communicate with people, no matter which specific phone or brand or platform they were using.

If the iPhone (with iMessage pre-installed) had been the dominant smartphone and ecosystem at the time, chances are that what's happening in the US would have happened in Europe in exactly the same way.

It's exactly the same argument as with Windows and Internet Explorer: if Windows had been one podunk operating system out of many, nobody would have cared. The whole issue was that Microsoft used the market dominance of Windows to quasi-lock users into Internet Explorer.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] baronvonj@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's like how the US got so far ahead with reliable universal twisted-pair phone lines, it took a lot longer here for people to really start having just a mobile phone compared to countries that were able to side-step their inadequate landline infrastructure with mobile phone services. WhatsApp largely gained prominence in countries that had much more cost effective data plans than SMS texting, making WhatsApp cheaper than SMS along with being available at all on Android (vs iMessage). In the US we had unlimited SMS messages included in plans before anything approaching that for data. So in the US SMS was already quite well entrenched in social circles by the time iMessage came out. And Apple knew that people wouldn't be so loyal to iMessage if they couldn't message with whatever non-trivial percentage of the social circle didn't have an iPhone so it inlucded SMS-fallback. There's plenty of WhatsApp and Signal users in the US at this point. But nobody cares enough to try and get everyone to switch to one platform that is available everywhere and doesn't have SMS fallback, so SMS is still the glue that holds all the messaging together in the US.

edit: I think I can safely say it's going to take the big 3 carriers in the US all agreeing to drop SMS (which pretty much will probably take the GSM standards body dropping SMS) for the US to truly move off of it.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's only valid if you're comparing the US with 3rd World nations.

When mobile phones took of, even poor peripheral southern european nations (like mine) already had good fixed line telephone infrastructures and certainly the few people who didn't have a phone line yet weren't the kind that could afford early mobile phones.

In reality the fast growth in mobile phone adoption in the EU vs US is a case study in how top down enforced standardization can help markets: whilst the US had multiple network standards which required diferent phones and were incompatible with each other, in Europe governments were forcing mobile carriers (by making it a condition to get a radio spectrum license to operate as one) to use GSM, so all phones were compatible and pretty much from day 1 you could, for example, use your phone in a different country even though it was linked to a diferent carrier in your home-country.

Because of this, even though the mobile phone infrastructure started behind that of the US, it and mobile phone adoption grew much faster than in the fragmented US market and this was what allowed Nokia from Finland to, for a while, be the largest mobile phone manufacturer in the World (most of which they lost when smartphones became a thing).

Eventually the US itself ended up doing the same thing, if I remember it correctly by around the late 90s with v3 of GSM.

[-] baronvonj@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Those are valid observations, but the different technologies all terminated to the POTS network, so phone calls across networks always worked. But it was just considerably more expensive to make phone calls on mobile than land lines where you could get flat-rate unlimited calling (local, not long distance, getting a cell phone then could potentially be cheaper for long distance). It was the early 00s when flat-rate unlimited plans were becoming common in the US, and that's when people started ditching their land lines.

AT&T was notable for being the first one (of the Big 3) here using internationally compatible GSM in the 90s. But it actually wasn't until LTE that Verizon stopped using CDMA for data (but they still used it for voice) in 2010 when we finally started seeing things trend towards adopting a common standard in the Big 3 national carriers. Sprint went with Wi-MAX instead of LTE for data at that time, and having to retool to LTE was one of the financial straws that broke their back.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] tja@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I tried to use the Google chat apps. There were some nice ones. ( still missing allo). But they changed too often, so now no Google chat app anymore.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 year ago

100% of iPhone users have iMessage. And they can use the same app to talk to 100% of their contacts.

Fragmentation is a huge problem for everything else. What percentage of Android users have any particular one of those apps you listed?

I only grudgingly install WhatsApp when I travel to Europe. Discordv and Slack are not really competitors in this space (though I'm sure there's a small subset of users who use them that way). I have Signal and Telegram and yet I still use SMS with most of my contacts because that's the only one that is guaranteed to work.

I've tried getting my friends onto Signal, with some amount of success. But many have eventually stopped using it because I was the only one they used it with. A couple of my iPhone-using family members reported that they stopped getting notifications from Signal because they used it so infrequently that iOS basically disabled it (I guess it does that after a month of disuse but I'm not sure exactly).

It's a losing battle. We've fallen back to SMS.

[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Fragmentation is a huge problem for everything else. What percentage of Android users have any particular one of those apps you listed?

WhatApp is installed on little bit under 100% among all Android phones and iPhones in most EU countries and should the EU actually tackle messenger interoperability, iMessage is definitively not the main target. The most die-hard Apple fans I know use iMessage for a little bit when new features were introduced. Then they go back to WhatsApp like everybody else.

To be clear: I'm not an advocate of WhatApp here, I'm merely explaining that the EU does not care at all about Apple's chat service nobody in the EU uses. Should any legislation even affect iMessage, it'll be more coincidental, not targeted at it.

[-] Swarfega@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

I don't know about the rest of the world but in the UK text messages used to cost 10p for each one you send. Multimedia messages were like 40p. Really expensive. WhatsApp came about and made both of these free. The rest is history.

Ironically, SMS are generally free these days but nobody obviously uses them. My SMS app is just full of OTP codes being sent to me.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] happyhippo@feddit.it 8 points 1 year ago

A couple of my iPhone-using family members reported that they stopped getting notifications from Signal because they used it so infrequently that iOS basically disabled it

THE BEST OS ever /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] gamey@feddit.rocks 3 points 1 year ago

It's sad and I don't have it but here in Europe Whatsapp doesn't seem far from 100%!

[-] exohuman@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

It’s so dumb. I have the same problem. I have an iPhone and I try to get them to use Signal, but they just keep using SMS and we keep getting garbage video being sent over group text since some of the group uses Android. When I complain they start putting stuff in Google Photo Albums instead of just using a decent messenger.

[-] EssentialCoffee@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago

such as high-quality media sharing, read receipts, and more.

Who tf wants read receipts? The first thing I do on a new phone is make sure that shit is turned off.

[-] aluminium@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you think Apple will implement these changes outside the E.U. you gotta be insane.

Also with the news that Qualcomm is hiking prices again, Samsung releasing their least ambitious Smartphone lineup ever this year, Oneplus annihalting their core audience, Huawei being banned, Xiaomi releasing the most confusing product stack imaginable, and Google taking another year off on adding meaningfull features to Android, is this really surprising?

[-] ExLisper@linux.community 9 points 1 year ago

Yeah, what a shame Android is not adding meaningful features like... checks notes.. https://www.wired.com/story/apple-iphone-ios-17-ipados-17-new-features/ stickers, contact posters, some updated apps and... showing time. My god, the things I miss on Android!

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 year ago

Yes because I didn't know about any of this

[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago

If you think Apple will implement these changes outside the E.U. you gotta be insane.

I'm interested in the logistics of this. I'm an EU citizen, I prefer using Signal for my messaging, but I do my share of Whatsapp with some people. What the EU mandates is that Apple provides an open API for everyone else to implement sending messages with to iMessage. So as an EU citizen, I will need to be able to use the API to send messages to other EU citizens. Will I be also able to send messages to people outside of the EU or will the API just say that's not permitted? Does that infringe on my rights as an EU citizen? If it does, and I need to be permitted, will a group chat for example stop working as I leave if I'm the only European?

[-] mnrockclimber@lemmy.sdf.org 35 points 1 year ago
[-] Fisch@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

I don't think it's that important who makes the messenger. Most people outside the US use messengers like WhatsApp anyway.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] steakmeout@aussie.zone 28 points 1 year ago

Apple dominates? They have just over 50% of a carrier driven market. That's not domination.

[-] FiskFisk33@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

one single company have over 50% market share? thats domination in my book

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] steltek@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

A quick search says Amazon is 37% of online commerce (depending on which sketchy result you want to trust enough for a Lemmy thread).

If Amazon is problematic, then Apple is a serious issue.

[-] zephyreks@programming.dev 13 points 1 year ago

Like 90% of the under-20 market...

[-] tal@kbin.social 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Only the EU can save Android in the US now

That sounds a little melodramatic. Apple has a slightly higher marketshare in the US, and that's the case in few places:

https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/what-google-needs-to-do-for-android-to-overcome-apple-and-iphone-in-2023/

Google has fallen second place to Apple in the Android vs. iPhone war for the first time in over a decade.

From a global perspective, Apple's dominance is an outlier. The US, Canada and Japan are the only countries where Apple has an edge over Android. Everywhere else Android leads, usually by a wide margin.

And, I gotta say:

But this has also brought a rising tide of elitism, as some US iPhone owners perceive Android as cheaper and inferior.

I think that maybe, the point where one's favored platform has slightly under 50% marketshare in an -- admittedly large -- country is maybe just a bit premature to start wallowing in victimhood.

https://www.gocomics.com/calvinandhobbes/1993/01/21/

It doesn’t help Android OEMs that Apple makes it exceptionally difficult to leave its ecosystem or switch between platforms. For starters, the company’s services are either exclusive to its platforms (iMessage) or woefully underbaked on Android (see Apple TV Plus and Facetime)

iOS is more of a walled garden, that's true, but Google is not entirely innocent here either.

[-] dtjones@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

I've seen this a lot lately on lemmy - that android needs "saving" or that we need government intervention to stop Apple. But, I would argue that android is its own worst enemy. Even the best android phones are plagued by quality issues, both hardware and software. Google's own pixel lineup has seasonal class action lawsuits over build issues, and now they automatically opt you into non-arbitration agreements whenever you activate a new Google phone.

Personally, I'm willing to take the risk because, in my experience, stock android is just so much better than iOS (and other android flavors). But therein lies the issue - android could compete with iPhone just fine, but android manufacturers can't (or won't) compete with apple's relentless pursuit of build quality and software polish. Another damning aspect of this is that Google is supposed to be the best software company in the world, yet they've taken more than a decade to figure out messaging - something apple figured out back in ~2010. Android doesn't deserve to claw back market share in the US until their phones are actually better per $ than the iPhone.

¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

As somebody who has professionally done software for Android (and iOS and a lot of other things all the way back to very early dynamic websites with CGI-script backends) I would say that the biggest enemy of Android is the increasing bloat of each new version of the framework as it was not designed well to begin with, has "evolved" by layering stuff on top of stuff and has had multiple changes in the way it's supposed to be used (in the professional lingo, "at the technical architeture level") so it's been a bloated mess for a while.

The result is a slower OS which uses more memory and storage and ditto for apps made for it, and they've even managed to fragment the developer community (by adding a 2nd programming language, for no reason other than to copy Apple in doing so) and frankly I see no sign at all that the bloatware-framework trend will stop, much less reverse (my - granted, limited - experience with Google Technical Architects is that they're not really qualified at that level)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AphoticDev@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 year ago

Look, android lost the lead in market share, but it's still a huge part of the market. It's not dying off for years to come, if it even does.

It will if google shitposts a bit harder

[-] lapommedeterre@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

At work it was like... Most software developers had android devices, and then business and management had iPhones.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
231 points (88.9% liked)

Android

17810 readers
108 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

🔗Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


💡Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

💬Matrix Chat

💬Telegram channels / chats

📰Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS