97
The Economist strikes again (www.economist.com)
submitted 5 months ago by yogthos@lemmygrad.ml to c/news@hexbear.net

some obligatory memes

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] space_comrade@hexbear.net 40 points 5 months ago
[-] Rom@hexbear.net 34 points 5 months ago
[-] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 12 points 5 months ago

He's doing it. He's pressing the communism button.

[-] SSJ2Marx@hexbear.net 38 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Still reading the article, just some notes off the top of my head:

Its famously industrious workforce is shrinking,

Chinese production is now more automated than America's

history’s wildest property boom has turned to bust

COVID accelerated the process of course but the five year plan accounted for this downturn because they recognize that you can only build so many planned cities and high rise apartments before you don't need any more

and the global system of free trade that China used to get richer is disintegrating.

China has been very deliberately cultivating an alternative economic bloc that isn't controlled by the American Navy

[-] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Its famously industrious workforce is shrinking,

China has 20-30 years of an expanding, urban, highly-educated workforce. If America's government was as competent as China's, they could hope to compete in a few decades when trends reverse and that shrinking population actually starts to hurt, but since it's not...

[-] Beaver@hexbear.net 12 points 5 months ago

history’s wildest property boom has turned to bust

Western "analysts" can't comprehend the idea of pre-planning a couple decades of building ahead of the growth curve, and then winding down that building when it's no longer needed. Their heads can only imagine market based solutions, producing such highly efficient outcomes as the current housing situation in the anglosphere.

[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 34 points 5 months ago

Hey tankies explain this. If china is so good then why does its economy not grow exponentially until forever and ever. Owned.

[-] zifnab25@hexbear.net 33 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Xi Jinping: "People should have housing and should be able to afford living in their houses."

Ten Thousand Western Op Eds: "This guarantees the inevitable destruction of the Chinese Economy."

Compared with 12 months ago, let alone the go-go years, the mood in China is dour. Although industrial production perked up in March, consumers are depressed, deflation lurks and many entrepreneurs are disillusioned. Behind the angst lie deeper fears about China’s vulnerabilities. It is forecast to lose 20% of its workforce by 2050. A crisis in the property industry, which drives a fifth of gdp, will take years to fix. It will hurt cash-strapped local governments that relied on land sales for revenues and flourishing real estate for growth. Relations with America are steadier, as a phone call between Mr Xi and President Joe Biden this week attested. But they remain fragile. Chinese officials are convinced that America will restrict more Chinese imports and penalise more Chinese firms, whoever wins the White House in November.

s/China/America/g

If AI was worth a fucking damn, I would love to see a LLM applied to this article relative to this absolute dick-sucking machine hagiography of the Saudi Line

We're getting into some weapon's grade parenti-hands as Western economists shit themselves in fury at China while cumming enthusiastically at Saudi Arabia for engaging in the exact same state-centric economic planning strategies.

Nevermind that the Saudis are being driven off a cliff by a 30-year-old Chud Gamer with a fetish for American mega-malls, while the Chinese are getting the benefit of the Immortal Science to inform their planning strategy. You would at least think a Free Market Spank Bank like The Economist would be able to draw a line between the two from a "Oh look! Command Economies!" high level perspective.

[-] Greenleaf@hexbear.net 21 points 5 months ago

And it’s all just vibes-based analysis. It’s not any deeper than “China is socialist, and since socialism doesn’t work and the free market is always more efficient than the government, anything that the CPC does other than unleash full capitalism is doomed to fail”.

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 5 months ago

always projection

[-] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 16 points 5 months ago

Relations with America are steadier, as a phone call between Mr Xi and President Joe Biden this week attested. But they remain fragile. Chinese officials are convinced that America will restrict more Chinese imports and penalise more Chinese firms, whoever wins the White House in November.

Why are the Chinese convinced Americans hate them? They’re acting as if the west is racist and capitalists complain about them

[-] Aquilae@hexbear.net 30 points 5 months ago

"China" as a separate entity will "collapse" once we achieve world communism

[-] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 21 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

And yet Sol will always remain the center of where human civilization first fluorished, no matter how far the Communist Interstellar reaches. A sort of "Zhong hua" if you will... thinking-about-it

[-] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 6 points 5 months ago

On that blessed day we will all be 中华民族.

[-] invo_rt@hexbear.net 27 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It's their fucking Twitter banner lenin-laugh

[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 26 points 5 months ago

Can't blame them tbh, if I had a twitter account it would be my banner too.

[-] invo_rt@hexbear.net 9 points 5 months ago
[-] Aquilae@hexbear.net 14 points 5 months ago

What the fuck lmao agony-shivering

[-] operacion_ogro@hexbear.net 25 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Flashbacks to my 2013 university poli-sci courses where the professor and guest lecturers confidently predicted a collapse of the Chinese economy in 2-3 years

[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 22 points 5 months ago

This eschews the conventional path of a big consumer stimulus to reflate the economy (that’s the kind of ruse the decadent West resorts to).

Uh, what are they talking about? The COVID checks? Because last I checked ALL of the ruse's resorted to by the decadent West have been supply side handouts totally what, nearly a trillion now?

[-] Greenleaf@hexbear.net 18 points 5 months ago

To The Economist, “consumers” are all the petite boug business owners that the government gave like a trillion in ~~free money~~ “loans” to.

[-] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 16 points 5 months ago

Blending techno-utopianism, central planning and an obsession with security

"These three pigs sure have an obsession with security for some reason."

  • The Wolf
[-] moonlake@hexbear.net 15 points 5 months ago

The CRO (Chief Racism Officer) of The Economist inventing new types of racism:

Oh my god the button 😭😭😭😭

NO ECONOMIST NO

[-] WaterBowlSlime@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 5 months ago

Is the headline for 2011 in that long meme real? "Business Insider: A Chinese." What's that supposed to mean lol

[-] AernaLingus@hexbear.net 9 points 5 months ago
[-] WaterBowlSlime@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 5 months ago

Those make much more sense. I was imagining an article where it's just like, a picture of a Chinese person haha

this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
97 points (100.0% liked)

news

23411 readers
550 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS