304
submitted 7 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

An Arizona rancher went on trial Friday in the fatal shooting of a migrant on his property near Mexico, with his defense attorney maintaining his innocence as the national debate over border security heats up ahead of this year’s presidential election.

George Alan Kelly, 75, has been charged with second-degree murder in the killing of a man he encountered on his property outside Nogales, Arizona. The jury trial in Santa Cruz County Superior Court is expected to last up to a month until around April 19, with proceedings held four days a week with Mondays off.

Kelly had earlier rejected a plea deal that would have reduced the charge to one count of negligent homicide if he pleaded guilty. His case has garnered the sympathy of some on the political right, with several efforts raising hundreds of thousands of dollars for his defense, including several on the GoFundMe platform that were quickly shut down because of the charges against him.

He was arrested and charged last year in the Jan. 30, 2023, fatal shooting of 48-year-old Gabriel Cuen-Buitimea of adjacent Nogales, Mexico, just south of the border.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 100 points 7 months ago

I don’t really see any difference between a migrant on your property and any other human being. If it’s fair game to shoot migrants, it should be fair game to shoot the Christian fundamentalists and Mormons knocking on my door.

[-] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago

Agree, but the context does matter here. Nogales is known for cartel drug (and human) smuggling. The article says the crossers on his ranch had been getting more aggressive(allegedly) so he armed himself.

The article also mentions that he saw 5 guys with large "backpacks" and rifles. That description is very likely drug smugglers (whose "backpacks" were actually 50-75lb marijuana bundles) and not just your average migrant crossers.

They also report hearing a gun shot.

But the article is sparse on how we get from that to the rancher "shooting over (allegedly unarmed) migrants heads" with a an ak47.

Especially because the timeframe was presumably "late lunch" aka broad daylight.

I'm always wary of jumping to conclusions because these stories are usually much more involved than headlines or even articles like this tend to let on.

[-] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 23 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Who the hell smuggles weed into Arizona? You can buy it at the store...

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

Is it necessary to smuggle weed into the U.S. at all anymore? There are huge commercial grow operations.

Smuggling it into another state, sure...

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] extant@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

People who grow it outside the US and want to profit off selling it in the US is who is smuggling it. Why is it even still worth doing with legalized weed, simple it's cheap to grow so it can be sold for a low price that legal markets don't want to give up their high profit margins and governments who tax the legal sales are percentage based so they have no incentive to encourage lower prices and thus the illegal market is still profitable.

[-] olympicyes@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

The entire opening scene of Beverly Hills Cop is Axel Foley trying to stop a truckload of cigarettes without government tax stamps. Bart Simpson also stored a truckload of Laramie 100 cigarettes in his room on behalf of his boss Fat Tony which they lifted off a truck for the same purpose.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 12 points 7 months ago

Nobody is smuggling weed over the border when you can just drive it over from any nearby state.

Who knows what they were doing, but I think it's unlikely they're going to want to get in gun fights if they're trying to sneakily smuggle something across the border.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Arizona had recreational weed available 3 years prior to this shooting. Not much weed is likely smuggled there. I'm no expert though, maybe bringing into legal states is less risky and then moving it to other states.

[-] whereisk@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

All that can be true and they still don't make the person investigator, judge and executioner. I guess we'll see what the defence says at the trial - I'm assuming "feared for his personal safety" will feature heavily.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Zron@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

Exactly, how did he supposedly identify them as migrants without talking to them?

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Yeah, pretty sure that's the plan for most of them.

Republican Rep. Justin Heap says his bill would apply the law to farmers and ranchers using deadly force against trespassers on their land, not just in their home.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I just have a hard time believing anyone wants to live like this. Everyone aiming guns at each other waiting for the slimiest justification to open fire and whomever survives claims self-defense.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

What if the person you're aiming at is a zombie?

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Zombies don't count. They don't have souls since they are voodoo.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 4 points 7 months ago

But the Voodoo Zombies specifically work by enslaving souls/minds...

Is this where we find out your dark secret? Have you been killing innocent victims of evil Voodoo priests?!?????

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Wait, are you telling me I can't marry a Zombie?

[-] bobzilla@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

So if I have a pot on my back porch and I grow some basil in it, does that make me a farmer? Can I start shooting the delivery drivers who are bringing packages to my door?

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 7 months ago

"His case has garnered the sympathy of some on the political right, with several efforts raising hundreds of thousands of dollars for his defense"

I hate this country.

Also, I'm really puzzled that this walking maga stereotype used a Russian weapon to attempt to murder an entire group of brown people. You'd think a guy like this would consider that "commie" shit. These types make as much sense as religious nuts.

[-] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago

American Conservatives love Russia. It's exactly the brand of Dictatorship they want.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jumjummy@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

They should try the Nitrogen mask on him.

[-] b3an@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

If someone shows complete lack of empathy and kills other humans like this, why should we have empathy for him?

[-] KillerTofu@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Because everyone deserves forgiveness?

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

All he has to do is cry some Rittenhouse tears.

[-] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I’m not American so I’d appreciate if someone could explain what’s wrong (legally, not morally) in this situation? From what I understand you’re free to shoot trespassers on your property, isn’t that what the whole “muh freedom” culture about?

[-] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 16 points 7 months ago

From what I understand you’re free to shoot trespassers on your property, isn’t that what the whole “muh freedom” culture about?

Castle doctrine applies to people trespassing inside of your home, not just anyone on your land. We just had a guy get life in prison for opening fire on college students who drove up his rural driveway when they had the wrong address.

If they let this guy get away with what he did, it's actually a pretty scary precident for all of us.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

You should read the article.

I think he's lying, but the defense's claim is that the group the man was in posed a credible threat, as an armed group.

Of course, his victim didn't have any weapons, so gl with that one buddy. We don't have the full picture but that's a pretty damning detail by itself.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] cmoney@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Typically deadly force can only be used if you think your life or safety is threatened, the police will still investigate the shooting and if they think your life or safety might not have been in jeopardy you'll end up in court hoping to justify your actions to a judge and jury.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 4 points 7 months ago

You can't just shoot anyone on your property as some people will have legitimate reasons to be there. As the other person said, your life has to be in danger.

Some states have expanded this to cover public property as well ("stand your ground") while many others give you a duty to retreat before you're justified in killing someone.

[-] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Thank you for the explanation.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
304 points (98.4% liked)

News

23305 readers
3662 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS