283
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit brought by two conservative groups intended to halt the Biden administration’s plan to cancel $39 billion in student loans for more than 800,000 borrowers.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 29 points 1 year ago

Why tf do conservatives hate the students of America? There is little room for the US to compete on the world stage if no one (but nepo-babies) can afford to be educated here.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
  1. It is denying the Democrats a win.

  2. Their districts are less educated so it doesn't impact them as much

  3. It gets them redhatter votes

You are right, long term policies like this are going to cripple our ability to compete. At a certain point we won't be able to just depend on a stream of educated immigrants and kids of the super rich.

Edit: you can also read what they claimed in the suit

Adjustment will “extinguish the incentive for nearly a million student-loan borrowers to seek debt forgiveness through PSLF and thus will disadvantage [Plaintiffs] in the market to recruit and retain” borrowers as employees

They won't be able to get workers if workers have less debt. Don't even try to hide it sometimes.

[-] sndmn@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago

The more people are educated, the less they are conservative.

[-] Psythik@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Because you have to keep the voters uneducated since only stupid people vote Republican.

[-] ilickfrogs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Because there's 2 types of conservatives, the rich and greedy self centered ass hats who don't need an education. And then the stupid people. They'd be throwing away a part of their base if they allowed them to learn.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

CATO backed the suit and their board of directors is about half bankers or former bankers. This isn't even the first time they tried this, back October last year.

They couldn't win in public opinion, they couldn't win by lobbying, so they tried it in court. They failed completely to demonstrate that they had any standing to bring this case.

They also claim to be libertarian. Just something to remember the next time people tell you that there is a difference between the two.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Don't you know? You don't need standing anymore. You only need imaginary hypothetical possible standing.

Or maybe that just applies to wedding website developers. I'm not clear on the case law.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah I admit I don't understand the law very well but it's weird how offended observer no longer counts for church separation laws. That web design event planner was especially interesting since no one gay had actually asked about it. Seems the lawyers just made it up.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It was very strange. Most lawyers expected the supreme court to toss it due to lack of standing. The fact that they didn't means that they're more of a legislative branch now. It's not a good precedent to set.

[-] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

The New Civil Liberties Alliance is an absolutely garbage non-profit organization.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago
[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 86 points 1 year ago

Beep boop bitch, here's the gist to this jazz:

Biden tried to secure $39 billion for student loan relief and a couple of bitch-ass nonprofits were like, "ouch! Our money!" The judge finally told them to shut the fuck up all like, "damn, you dumbasses weren't even all that injured. Y'all flop more than Tony Parker in a breezy corridor." The judge dismissed their whining without prejudice, which means these sharp-farters could try being little tattling shits again if they can prove real damage. The judge was like, "listen here dick-lips! Even if you could prove you were injured you gotta prove it was because of the loan forgiveness, not just say it was, shit-for-brains."

Then the Department of Education was all like, "WE'LL NEVER FUCKING STOP FIGHTING FOR THE FINANCIAL RIGHTS OF THOSE FUCKED BY INSTITUTIONALIZED POVERTY!"

How was my summary? I'm pretending to be a bot, so go fuck yourself. Report any issues here.

[-] sndmn@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

[-] Froyn@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

I can't shake the feeling that in 10 years, this will be a valid news format. Just one more step towards President Camacho.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Bot of the year 🥇

[-] Snowcano@startrek.website 8 points 1 year ago

I demand a news site where all articles are written in this fashion NOW!! This is solid fucking gold!

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago
this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
283 points (98.6% liked)

News

23267 readers
1153 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS