82
submitted 7 months ago by themaninblack@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] alekwithak@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago

No one is ever concerned with how much energy is used to feed ads to the entire population of earth 24/7.

[-] Liz@midwest.social 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Please propose a law or regulation structure for significantly reducing or eliminating advertisements. I'm serious. I fucking hate ads. I just don't have a reasonable or effective way to get rid of them.

Edit: Hey actually I just thought of one! If the consumer is paying for the product, it can't come with ads, including things like product placement or ad reads!

[-] valsa@lemmy.eco.br 9 points 7 months ago

In São Paulo, one of the biggest cities of the world, the municipality forbade by law all billboards and building disfiguring 'decorations' some 10 years ago. Since then, the city became much more bearable, aesthetically. Nothing special happened, everybody was happy, except a few bankrupt ads agencies. Maybe, you must be able to imagine that change is possible. However, there is this ideology, Americans seem to be so fond off, that seems to make such things very difficult.

[-] Liz@midwest.social 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

New Jersey also banned billboards. That one is pretty easy and I vote that we should adopt that policy everywhere. It's much harder to control digital adspace, since you can do things like astroturf campaigns and product placement. Great point though! I like that law.

[-] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 4 points 7 months ago

Hey actually I just thought of one! If the consumer is paying for the product, it can’t come with ads, including things like product placement or ad reads!

Smart TV manufacturers: "Impossible!"

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Ban advertising to minors/for products intended for children

Ban ads/branding visible from roadways to prevent distracted driving

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 months ago

Got a better one: just ban marketing outright

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I went and did some mafs.

This thing says the world consumes 180k TWh of energy per year.

This study estimates (with a considerable uncertainty) that the Internet amounts to around 5% of the world's energy usage.

Apparently, 48% of consumer web traffic is ads.. That is dystopian in itself, that means around half the content floating around the internet is stuff the client does not request but is pushed to them.

That would put the ad industry at 4500 TWh per year. However, this is back of the envelope.

Going off of this, a high estimate for crypto mining is 230 TWh.

That means the ad industry costs us around 20 times the cost of crypto in terms of power. Feel free to check me because I don't know shit about most of these things.

That said, this does not account for the entire ad industry, just the cost of sending internet ads around the world. Ads are made, ads are displayed in various media other than websites, and most importantly, ads have the sole purpose of driving further consumption, which all contributes to the societal costs of the ad industry.

[-] SaltyIceteaMaker@iusearchlinux.fyi 5 points 7 months ago

48%? Fuck i love my adblocker

[-] UnverifiedAPK@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Tbf most ads are on text news articles, one image can take up thousands of times more data than a few words.

And it's cached... and there are CDNs... Still way more energy than you want, but not quite as panic inducing as it sounds.

[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I am. Same loop of crap blasting on 20x massive screens 24/7 at the station.

Every store that keeps light on at night is also an ad.

My hate for them is one of the main drivers behind my radicalization.

[-] ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

My grandfather worked in the ad industry and couldn’t stand ads. He’s always mute the TV when they came on and we sat in uncomfortable silence.

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago

What do you mean 'uncomfortable'?

[-] ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Well I was like 25 when I took care of him for two weeks and a pretty hard partier so silence wasn’t really my thing at the time. I’m in my 40s with 4 kids so I’ll I love silence now. I’ll even stare at walls.

[-] Yewb@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Lets do an advertising tax 10% of all add revenue.

[-] alekwithak@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Unironically this.

[-] ULS@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Same with porn. But I'm building a shake-power generator for fleshlites so it should balance out the power it pulls. Saving the earth one jack-off at a time.

Charging a hybrid car battery only takes 253.4 jerks. Pretty soon we will be expanding our charging service to parking lots across America and Canada! Most of them already have people willing to do it for you already ...they were doing it there anyway... Win/win.

Powerjerk (tm), we make perverts work for you!

Just roll up and say "Hey Jagoff, I need to get to x!" And you'll promptly be taken care of.*

*Do not give them drugs to speed up the process. We are serious about our drug-free workplace.

Edit: steal my idea and I'll find you

[-] littlecolt@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Porn is more beneficial for humanity than imaginary ownership.

[-] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Energy isn't free. More power captured from jerking will increase food consumed, meaning more energy used in farming. You'll have to brand this as either a carbon ~~capture~~ fapture system or as a weight loss program

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] MBM@lemmings.world 1 points 7 months ago

Most people aren't loudly in favour of that, especially not the ones concerned with the power usage of blockchain

[-] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Perhaps, but you also never hear them complain about it anywhere near as loudly as people complaining about blockchains.

Yes, they’ll grumble about ads being annoying or YouTube blocking people who block ads, but the amount of power that gets wasted on this never even crosses anyone’s mind, meaning on some level, there exists agreement that advertisement are a necessary and responsible use of electricity while blockchains are not.

[-] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

That's because ad serving doesn't set a lower bound on the electricity price. The value of crypto and the value of electricity are linked.

For the sake of simplicity I'll just say Bitcoin.

If the price of Bitcoin stays constant (big if), and the rate of Bitcoin per watt does too, then everyone would start mining until the demand for power is so high that the price increases until it's as high as the Bitcoin per watt.

Sure, they are unrealistic assumptions, but it's easier to see this way that the value of Bitcoin is (almost) the same as electricity. If it were lower, noone would mine it, if higher, people would buy electricity with bitcoin for a profit until the 2 equalize.

Electricity will never be much cheaper than Bitcoin, market forces will make sure of that, causing a huge environmental impact. Ads, however, only use as much electricity as they need to operate, their amount is not decided based on how much electricity they waste.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[-] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 9 points 7 months ago

Distributed hashed linked list is so yesteryear. These days we're into text autocompletion instead.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 points 7 months ago

Hey, it's not just fancy autocomplete!

Thanks to years of innovation, it's now copyright infringement as well.

[-] bouh@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I wish copyrights will die to this technology! <3

[-] Electricblush@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

The thing is its only the copyrights of individual artists and creators that will die to this.

The big corpos will find a way to protect their value, just you wait.

They will steal from every single creative in the world and then sue them to hell and back if they use anything they them selves "own"

This is not a threat to the copyrights that you want to die.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cygon@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

...and, hear me out, that will be perfect for keeping messages untraceable by the government. Every single of those 200,000 computers will have full copies of all the messages ever transmitted, unencrypted, but they'll never be able to tell who wrote them and who they were for.

[-] Clent@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

No one who understands bitcoin ever thought it was untraceable.

In the early days it was really common to place messages in the chain.

There are literal marriage proposals among these message.

[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 1 points 7 months ago

I even considered the main benefit to be that it was super traceable.

I once tracked some stolen crypto trough multiple Wallets and exchanges to find the one wallet where those hackers where keeping all the spoils.

Granted the owners of a wallet aren't public and thats a form of anonymity but surely intelligence agencies can figure it out.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 2 points 7 months ago

At first I read "200.000" as a particularly precise float, and laughed at the absurdity. Then I realized he meant "two hundred thousand" and it came full-circle from comedy to tragedy. :(

[-] dipshit@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Or, you could just pick one computer, have it do the work and punish it by taking its money if it screws up (ETH).

But yeah you’re not wrong about minable coins.

[-] Pohl@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

The real charlatans were the “the technology has promise” people. No, the technology was dumb.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
82 points (97.7% liked)

Memes

45131 readers
1482 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS