360
"fund for the women who have been sexually assaulted by Donald Trump".
It should be a civil lawsuit fund. Pay the legal bills for other women to launch civil lawsuits against him. Bury the fucker.
Oh this is a much better idea. I was thinking like... vegetables? But now I hope for your thing instead:-).
I was thinking build a windmill next to maralago.
Oooh not bad - username does not check out in this case!:-)
A non-profit that handles lawsuits where powerful men have grabbed women by the pussy
I'd donate to that cause
I suggest spending it on additional defamation lawsuits against Donald Trump.
I like her idea better. Helping others would definitely piss him off.
;)
I doubt it. I don't think information that doesn't involve him directly even enters into his awareness.
Helping others sue him on the other hand...
Anything that hurts Donald Trump financially is helping others.
Give it to mexico, would piss him off more than anything. They have this real bad ~~cocaine~~ sugar problem and need to get it out... Or so Ive heard... From a ~~friend~~ neighbour...
On a serious note, getting mexicans across the border to get citizenship would give him a heart attack
load more comments
(1 replies)
A smart move would be to spend on a get out the vote effort in swing states.
Especially mail in ballots
Hire armed guards to guard the ballot boxes from armed 2A nutjobs
Absolutely this. I hope she does it.
Planned Parenthood and the ACLU
I don't think Trump actually has opinions on those organizations because they don't affect him personally. To him they're names he can mention to rile up his cult.
I suggest gay wind farm.
Donald thinks I'm a complete cunt, wouldn't piss on me if I were on fire atop Obama's presidential bed in a Russian hotel. He considers me to be worse than Hunter Biden's laptop.
Just saying.
Can confirm; this guy is a real asshole. Just, really, fuck this guy. ~~because he got here first to say this~~
Black people?
How many could she buy?
Trump probably doesn't actually hate anything... His crippling narcissism would stop him from focusing on something else long enough to hate it. He's an opportunist that repeats what he's told to publicly discourage by his handlers, but he couldn't tell you the things he "hated" yesterday.
Just ask the last guy he spoke to what they hate and you'll find it
load more comments
(2 replies)
is she actually going to get the money?
If he loses the appeal, I believe she will. He has to put 120% of the award in escrow with the court while the appeal process unfolds. The extra is actually for interest and fees, so if the appeal takes awhile, she might actually get more (if I’m understanding that correctly)!
He has to put 120% of the award in escrow with the court while the appeal process unfolds.
That's a very important part of the process. It does 2 things.
1: makes sure the victim can actually get the money at the end of the process.
2: prevents pointless appeals that have zero chance of success. Or at least makes the appealer think about the implications of losing a frivolous appeal.
The Biden campaign.
Ewww!!!!
Imagine spending all that money that could be used to help poor people on fucking joe biden.
At that point, Trump and his ilk still win lol.
A million dollar donation to any Democrat in a close race.
Trump hates my guts
On something he hates?
That’s… just a lot of salad, I’m not sure how much salad that can buy.
Um, maybe she could try to:
"Blunt the knives, bend the forks
Smash the bottles and burn the corks
Chip the glasses and crack the plates..."
🤷🏼♂️
Donate to anti oil efforts.
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
360 points (96.9% liked)
News
23301 readers
1397 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS