this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
17 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13944 readers
612 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At South Africa v. Israel (Genocide Convention) - Wikipedia:

A request that this article title be changed to South Africa's genocide case against Israel is under discussion. Please do not move this article until the discussion is closed.

Edit: Someone with a wikipedia account please link them to the ICJ page which is titled "Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel)"

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] edge@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Reminder that the main page is named "Palestinian genocide accusation", while China's supposed actions that indisputably have caused 0 deaths are just called "Uyghur genocide". The argument for the latter is that it's the "common name", i.e. the name Western media blindly parroted.

[–] iByteABit@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago

NATOpedia being NATOpedia

[–] edge@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

lmao some people in the replies are arguing that "genocide" should be removed from the title entirely so it's just called "South Africa v. Israel". The justification being that there's no other "South Africa v. Israel" court case, so "genocide" is an unnecessary disambiguation. Obviously that's bullshit and not even the real reason they want the word removed.