330
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

The announcement is the latest in a series of loan forgiveness actions by the administration after the Supreme Court last year struck down Biden's much broader plan.

In a new wave of student loan forgiveness, the Biden administration is canceling $5 billion in debt for 74,000 borrowers, many of whom worked in public sector jobs for more than a decade.

President Joe Biden said that 44,000 of Friday’s approved borrowers were having their education debt wiped clean after 10 years of public service, and that those borrowers included teachers, nurses and firefighters. Nearly 30,000 borrowers have worked toward repayment for at least 20 years but “never got the relief they earned through income-driven repayment plans,” Biden said in a statement.

It’s the latest round of loan forgiveness efforts after the Supreme Court struck down the White House’s student loan debt relief plan last year. Since the ruling, the White House has launched a series of smaller relief programs.

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 62 points 9 months ago

Damn... I think I can hear the conservatives and right wingers screeching from here...

[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago

Inb4 the "WHeRes mY REliEf?" Dickheads come out of the woodwork.

[-] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Don't forget all the pretend left wingers screaming to just sign away all debts with the waive of a pen then name dropping genocide and BernieBro like they're helping. Oh wait, they're already here lol.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

While they expect these teachers and nurses and fire fighters to put out all the fires the usurpers started on the White House lawn.

[-] Meron35@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

CANCEL CULTURE HAS GONE TOO FAR 😡🤬🤬 /s

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 34 points 9 months ago

Good move from Joe Biden.

[-] DontMakeMoreBabies@kbin.social 17 points 9 months ago

Half way to being forgiven with the PSLF program.

Feels like a fair trade? A decade of public work for far less pay than I'd make in the private sector in exchange for advanced schooling.

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Lucky. I get paid by the government for my work but I technically don't work for them so guess who's not even eligible.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON — In a new wave of student loan forgiveness, the Biden administration is canceling $5 billion in debt for 74,000 borrowers, many of whom worked in public sector jobs for more than a decade.

Since the ruling, the White House has launched a series of smaller relief programs.

“My Administration is able to deliver relief to these borrowers — and millions more — because of fixes we made to broken student loan programs that were preventing borrowers from getting relief they were entitled to under the law,” Biden said on Friday.

In December, Biden approved about $4.8 billion in student debt cancelation for more than 80,000 borrowers.

The Supreme Court struck down Biden's student loan relief plan in June, arguing that the program was unlawful because it was not explicitly approved by Congress.

Biden said in Friday's statement that "we are continuing to pursue an alternative path to deliver student debt relief to as many borrowers as possible as quickly as possible" in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision.


The original article contains 324 words, the summary contains 171 words. Saved 47%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net -1 points 9 months ago

Just forgive it all, for fucks sake.

[-] ZombieTheZombieCat@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Pretty sure he was about to do that, only to have republicans take it to the supreme court where it was struck down. I don't get why there's still this narrative of Biden being the bad guy because he can't just wipe out all student debt, and why some people keep framing that as his choice. I thought we all watched that SCOTUS case play out in real time.

[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 9 months ago

he would if the supreme court didnt strike it down...

[-] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net -1 points 9 months ago

The case before the Supreme Court was based on the exclusion of some borrowers. The first action was to forgive $5-10k for low- and middle-income borrowers. The people who sued were well-off enough that they weren’t included. If his first move had been to cancel all student debt guaranteed by the federal government, the plaintiffs would have lacked standing to sue and the case would likely not have gone to the Supreme Court. If it had it would have been a much weaker case because there would be no group of borrowers who were excluded.

this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
330 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19072 readers
4584 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS