338
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Donald Trump continued his push on Saturday to win the Republican presidential nomination with a pair of caucus rallies in Iowa, beginning at the DMACC Conference Center in Newton and then culminating in Clinton. His speeches come on the third anniversary of Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol and a little more than a week before the Republican Iowa caucus commences on Jan. 15.

As for commemorating the solemn anniversary of Jan. 6, Trump lauded the insurrectionists, while labeling some immigrants as “terrorists” and prisoners and gang members. “And terrorists are coming in also. What they’re doing to our country is not — it’s it’s, when you talk about insurrection, what they’re doing? That’s the real deal. That the real deal — not patriotically and peacefully, peacefully and patriotically” he said, contrasting those who rioted as “peaceful” and “patriotic” against immigrants, who the four-time indicted former president continually paints as criminals.

“I’m so attracted to seeing it,” Trump said. “So many mistakes were made. See, there was something I think could have been negotiated to be honest with you. … I was reading something and I said, ‘This is something that could have been negotiated … that was a that was a tough one for our country… If you negotiated it, you probably wouldn’t even know who Abraham Lincoln was … but that would have been OK.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 92 points 10 months ago

If you negotiated it, you probably wouldn’t even know who Abraham Lincoln was

What he actually means by this is that he knows most people think Abraham Lincoln was a better president than he was and he can't stand it.

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 55 points 10 months ago

I see you're fluent in narcissist.

[-] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Fucking DUBYA was a better President! Like, Trump set the bar on the fucking floor, and now he's trying to dig under it!

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 73 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Fucking christ, how can anyone take in this verbal diarrhea and think that trump is suitable to work a glory hole, let alone do a serious job? On top of being traitor swine, republicans are dumber than dogshit.

[-] Subverb@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

If Trump were working a glory hole you'd have people accusing you of abusing the mentally handicapped. Not even joking.

[-] finthechat@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago

Yeah man. If i walked up to a gloryhole and a river of shit was flowing out of it, I'd just leave.

[-] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 6 points 10 months ago

Because cult brainwashing is a powerful thing.

load more comments (-1 replies)
[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 64 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The fact of the matter is that slavery was negotiated endlessly. The north and south argued about it ferociously, and there were dead ass fist fights in Congress about it. Remember that the US was hardly the first, and closer to the last, nation in the west (I'm only making this distinction because I know significantly less about this time period outside of the west) to ban chattel slavery, and by a pretty good margin. It wasn't for lack of trying by the north's politicians, but the south had evolved the question of slavery into an existential matter for themselves, and basically said that "without slavery, there is no south". This made it so that every political attack on slavery was framed as an attack on the very existence of the south itself, which made the subject impossible to negotiate on. There's a lot more detail that can be got into here, like the insane performative concessions for slavery (that is, in favor of it) that the south demanded that are reincarnated in the braindead performance politics of MAGA today, but that's a story for another day.

The gist is that when Lincoln, the candidate from the abolitionist party (the republicans. Yeah, a lot has changed lol) won the election, the south had the ultimate shit fit and decided they'd sooner reject the legitimacy of the government than live under a president who, while he probably wouldn't fully abolish slavery, was against it enough to be part of the abolition party. There was no negotiating this; the founding fathers tried it, and people tried it for decades between then and the war, and when faced with the spectre of maybe having to negotiate some change or moderation, the south looked the north directly in the eye and shit its pants as loud and ferociously as possible. You can see this attitude in the Cornerstone Speech (incidentally, it is a wonderful speech to pull out when someone says the war wasn't about slavery), which is a speech by the first VP of the Confederacy about how this war is absolutely 100% about preserving slavery.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago

https://richardpoe.substack.com/p/how-the-british-caused-the-american

Not unlike Putin today, Lord Palmerston was pushing the South to secede.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I haven't heard of the Cornerstone Speech before, or perhaps I don't remember it from school from many many years ago. But I do wonder how did you hear about it? Class? A book? Would love to know where you acquired some of your US history knowledge because I'd like to know and learn more about the history myself and this seems like a crucial piece of history to know so I do thank you for sharing.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago

Reminder, people very much tried to negotiate before and during the American civil war.

The key compromise efforts were basically all around finding a way to let the south keep slaves and continue treating people like property. Compromise efforts did not gain enough support to make it through the legislature.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago

They'll sacrifice their lives for a person who is demonstrably the actual biggest loser in history, and he just gets more loser-y, folks, okay... If any of you are starting to have your memories fade, here's a quick refresher to read this morning and then copy and send to your aunt karen in Missouri.

  • 0 re-elections won
  • 1 term president
  • 2 times impeached
  • 3 marriages
  • 4 inch lifts in his shoes
  • 5 kids, from 3 different mothers
  • 6 bankruptcies
  • 7 US Capitol police suing him for Jan 6 terrorist insurrection and murder of police
  • 8 trillion + dollars added to the US debt in a single term
  • 9 trump lawyers sanctioned by federal judge for lying in frivolous election fraud lawsuits and ordered to pay defendant's legal fees
  • 10 years that trump paid $0 in income taxes between 2000 and 2015. ($0 to cops, teachers, roads, prisons, disaster relief, etc)
  • 11 trump associates charged with serious crimes over the past 5 years
  • 12 million votes (the big lie) - trump claims he won the 2020 election by 12 million votes when in reality, he lost by about 7 million votes.
  • 13 of August, 2021 - one of multiple days that trump was supposed to magically become president again according to Qanon and a crack addicted pillow salesman (the two most respected information sources in the gop)
  • 14 year old girl in a youth choir that trump approached in 1992 to say, "Wow! Just think - in a couple years I'll be dating you."
  • 15 originally confirmed cases of COVID in the US trump said would soon be, “down to close to zero.” followed by, “like a miracle, it will disappear.” - over 1,000,000 Americans have since died of COVID and it continues to kill 4 years later.
  • 16 years old - age of daughter ivanka when she hosted "miss teen" pageant and, according to long time trump associate Noel Casler, "trump called her over in the middle of a rehearsal and had her give him a lap dance while he leered at the crew."
  • 17 known trump and russia investigations from local, state and federal prosecutors
  • 18 gop senators that ignored trump threats / warnings and supported Biden admin's infrastructure bill.
  • 19 as in COVID19 - trump was verified as the single largest source of disinformation on the virus, with a Cornell study claiming that 38% of the "misinformation conversation" originated with trump
  • 20 the day in January, 2021, when Biden was sworn in despite trump inciting a violent insurrection to stop election verification at the US Capitol.
  • 21 gun salute that trump ordered for himself when he left office after a humiliating defeat, even though he never served in the military, famously called military members "losers" and "suckers" and actively avoided the draft with a cowardly "bone spurs" excuse.
  • 22 date in August, 2021, when Alabama hate rally crowd booed trump for finally saying people should get vaccinated, only after 700,000 Americans have died due mostly to his failure as president
  • 23 as in wrestlemania 23 in 2007 where trump, a cartoon level failure with no other prospects, participated in a fake bet that a proxy wrestler would win a fake fight on his behalf or he would shave his wig and hair plugs off.
  • 24 day in August, 2021, when trump actually filed a lawsuit in Florida court against YouTube, a private company, demanding that they reinstate his YouTube channel like a desperate, irrelevant embarrassment with no platforms left to abuse.
  • 25 plus credible sexual assault allegations against trump, spanning decades and with accusers starting as young as 13 years old at time of assault.
[-] massacre@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

A bit tortured to make that list in a numerical order, but upvoted for the effort. Also - recommend taking away opinions like "most respected information sources in the GOP" - stick to the facts - there are plenty of them.

You also forgot the absolute laundry list of indictements, fraud in his Real Estate business, defrauding his own charity, rape of his ex-wife, COUNTLESS contractors and lawyers left unpaid in his wake, foreign payments while he was in office, etc...

And you don't even have to get into conjecture like selling state secrets, being a Russian asset, Russian mob ties, or the fact that he stinks like B.O. and soiled diapers.

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 10 months ago

Bro has got the fucking receipts

[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'd rather have 184 birds and 5 golden rings, thanks

[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 26 points 10 months ago

Trump negotiating before the Civil War: "You can keep the slaves, okay? I say you can keep the slaves, and you know what, the Supreme Court - they say - very fine people - they say that the woke ABOLITIONIST states can't stop you."

[-] withnail@infosec.pub 25 points 10 months ago

Why do they keep talking about Nikki? The Civil War? What was that? She's getting all the attention! So much attention. I better wade in. The civil war... what was it again? Slavery? I bet they could have negotiated to keep slavery. Don't say that part? OK, but I can say negotiation, right?

[-] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

Hahaha you just made me realize the warmup sessions or whatever he does before the rally must have even better material

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 20 points 10 months ago

Fascist says stupid fashy things, Republicans eat it up like the authoritarian trash they are.

[-] Art3sian@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You dummies. You know he says this shit intentionally, yeah?

  1. He knows his fan base won’t care and probably agree. They’re locked in.
  2. He knows the media with cover his outrageous statements, so that means…
  3. He gets another front page/headline/viral bump to get another small piece of the swing voters.

He is an absolute master PR-man, and no one has ever respected that fact to their own detriment.

Disclaimer: I hate the dickhead.

[-] wildcardology@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah, they even agreed with trump saying that he'll be a dictator for one day. If fact they want him to be dictator forever.

[-] cashews_best_nut@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

Can't believe his native language is English. I've known 4yr olds more coherent.

[-] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Trump's idea of negotiating is simply giving the more evil side whatever they demand, so yeas, I fully agree that Trump would have ended that war in the most pleasing manner. For one side. And then he'd go slave shopping.

[-] TheMusicalFruit@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

He said he was “reading something” so you know he just made it all up.

[-] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

"And then all the historians in the room with me and the books said "Sir...", "Sir..." they told me, "... if only you had been there, Sir. You would have negotiated and everybody would have had what they wanted and then there wouldn't have been a civil war, Sir. There would have been slavery and there would have been freedom and Lincoln wouldn't know what to do, Sir. If only you could have been president then and now and forever then the country would be so, so great Sir. Sire." And then they all started clapping"

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

The Art of The Deal

[-] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I'm curious what the reaction of his audience was, though I'm sure they easily agreed.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago
[-] overzeetop@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

A good negotiator would get at least 3/5ths.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 3 points 10 months ago

And then culminating in Clinton

Is not a succession of words I particularly like in an article about Trump..

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2024
338 points (95.9% liked)

politics

19159 readers
4564 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS