this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2026
826 points (98.0% liked)

News

39820 readers
2034 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on. Keep on-topic


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Now we understand why Trump didn’t want [the Epstein files] released.

Just a week before the midterm elections, which are already shaping up to be a bloodbath for the GOP, Democrats have dropped a bombshell. “A growing body of evidence demonstrates that Donald Trump was an active participant in Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse of young women during the mid-to-late 1990s,” states a just-released report from the Democrats of the House Judiciary Committee.

Additionally, they claim that Trump has leveraged his FBI and DOJ to cover up the evidence, and have now called for the appointment of a special counsel to investigate any potential wrongdoing.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 78 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I don't get it. Didn't we already know this? Is this not the bedrock that all of his heinous decisions are based on? What other reason would he start a war with Iran? No other reason than to move the spotlight away form his degenerate pedophilia.

[–] abc@suppo.fi 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Voters have to be reminded of things, constantly. With hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars.

[–] FudgyMcTubbs@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

No other reason ...

He and his buddies make a fortune when the gas prices dip then go up.

[–] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

1-The justice system works off of proof and evidence, not conjecture or presumption, no matter how likely the odds are (ideally speaking that is, different rules may apply depending on your race)

2-Since the President is also in charge of the DOJ, he has the power to tell them to just drop the issue. Now, a super-majority in Congress can bypass that, but currently that just ain't gonna happen

3-Like someone else pointed out, this headline was not written with people like you and me in mind, but rather people who were/are still hesitant to believe what the rest of us know to be true until they have literally no other option, and even then a large number of them will probably just go full-on into denial mode because they can't handle the idea that they were so wrong about something for so long

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 58 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We now know the things we all knew 2 years ago. Finally, after all this time, accusations are coming to light after spending so long out in the open and fully in the light.

[–] SuperEars@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

I swear I heard this same headline 2 years ago around election time. "Bombshell" then too.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 44 points 2 days ago (9 children)

So the Democrats had the power to release this evidence but chose to just hold onto it until right now?

[–] Marleyinoc@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

So the Republicans do everything in Lock step with him, are in total power of all three branches of government, and aren't doing diddly squat except to empower him even more?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 19 hours ago

Yes. They are Nazis. What’s your point?

[–] deft@lemmy.wtf 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ahh but this is the problem.

Define "the Democrats". We want names specifically who prevented these from being released? Who knew and said nothing.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Joe Biden. Chuck Schumer. Hillary Clinton. All of the top brass.

[–] deft@lemmy.wtf 6 points 2 days ago

Exactly. Tons of people running under a dem ticket have no ties to this shit. Don't let them draw political lines.

Ain't no war like the class war

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

We didn't know it before? I thought it was pretty obvious.

[–] anewfox@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago

the media wants the conversation to stick to "look what we found" without moving to "what should we do about it," hence the constant headlines about us """discovering""" trump's connections to epstein.

social media included.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ninjabard@lemmy.world 385 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is no surprise to any rational human being.

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I, for one, am shocked. I just thought Epstein and Maxwell were two lone pedos with unrelated connections to teen modeling agencies and other known sex predators. Sure, the FBI found 300gb of data which later turned out to be dozens of terabytes, including video, which were later hacked, but the FBI said the data wasn't compromised, so no foul there. It's a shame he and so many of his clients died of totally natural or self-inflicted causes in such a short time afterward. I bet the discovery phase in court would have confirmed that his associates were blameless and that he was just maintaining a 20-40 terabyte collection of porn for personal use. The whole thing was so unrelated and random that they had to move Ghislaine Maxwell to a low-security prison despite her convictions for some of the worst and highest profile felonies in recent history.

But now there's evidence against another person whose name was all over the files and who has also bragged about inappropriate behavior with minors? Consider me shell shocked. Still, having been born yesterday, this is my first real day on earth, so what do I know.

[–] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 59 points 2 days ago (1 children)

dear fediverse users: you are not the audience this headline is trying to reach.

[–] DrSoap@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

But, but... Epstein didn't kill himself

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Trump doesn't care about being implicated in corruption, he's already established even in the legal sense to be a criminal and a rapist. Being implicated for more rape isn't going to make any noticable change. But what does a strong man really fear? Being perceived as weak. Being perceived as less of a man than any other. There is something he's burying that is going to make him look really bad to his base, that a sane person with morals wouldn't realize is that notable but will be completely devastating for a strongman wannabe dictator. I'm so curious what that is mostly for the human psychology aspect of what actually does scare trump and keep him up at night?

[–] Yuccagnocchiyaki@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Probably his bisexual nature.

We have watched him: -Talk about Arnold Palmer's cock -Deepthroat a microphone -Talk about how strong and muscular dudes "hurt his hand" when he taps their shoulder. -Touched an athlete's cock -said he checks out guys' asses.

I mean, he is a soft man that covers himself in makeup and just cares about ballrooms and interior decoration. Normal people have always known he is a QUEEN. Ironically, him coming out would devastate the right, while the rest of us would still just hate him because he is a Nazi pedophile rapist war criminal.

[–] FullPenguin@lemmy.world 275 points 3 days ago (6 children)

This won't change a thing. Republicans know Trump rapes kids, they've decided that it's not a deal breaker.

[–] Hanrahan@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] yakko@feddit.uk 31 points 2 days ago

@badfaithact

Hmm

[–] FullPenguin@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

When I say "Republicans" I'm not just talking about politicians. Republican voters have all chosen to support pedophilia, rape, and blatant corrupion.

It's actually not even clear what other policies Republican voters support. It's not small government, fiscal responsibility, family values, or law and order. As far as I can tell, they're only the party of pedophiles.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Akh@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 96 points 2 days ago (2 children)

We Finally Know Why Trump Has Tried So Hard to Hide the Epstein Files
slowpoke

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 140 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Um..we all pretty much got it...like years ago..decades even

[–] CoconutLove@lemmy.today 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Dems were just waiting for the news to have maximal political impact when they announce their conclusion. Right before the midterms hopefully moves some voters and also sets them up to impeach if they win.

[–] Joeffect@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (4 children)

You mean impeach the president who had already been impeached?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago (4 children)

So many of you in the comments are subject to exactly what the article describes:

"Part of the problem with the stories of Epstein, Trump, and the corruption all come down to the same thing: The bit-by-bit release of information has created a long record of abhorrent behavior, which means that the bar to shock is so high it’s almost impossible to clear. There is a kind of disgust fatigue at play: Yeah, we know Epstein was a disgusting sex predator, and that some of the men around him probably partook too; what’s new? Those who are ideologically motivated to believe Trump at all costs are also probably motivated to believe him on Epstein too; very little seems like it would change the minds of hardcore MAGA adherents."

They said they worked to "flood the zone with shit" and you are all spewing it today. Calm down with the surprise memes. Sit in the hard feelings, shut up or do something about it

[–] raze2012@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

or do something about it

What can I dom? It's kind of a trope with millennials at this point that memes are the form of "action" that represents our overall powerlessness to hold such people accountable, despite it being a scandal that redefines the meaning of "watershed moment".

If diddling kids for decades isn't enough to enrage a country into burning it down, what is?

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

The answer to you're question is literally the last sentence in the message ur responding to - do something means go support change where you can, run for office or support someone who is with the right ideas, directly. If you can't do that, you shut up - shut up and go to brunch, head in sand. And stay quiet about it all, verbally , through typed messages and memes. if you can't do that and be done, then you actively live in the discomfort , confront this horrific shit head on until it drives you to action. Those are your options.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Right? The leader of a country is known for hurting children. Everyone just says, "Yeah I don't like it, but there's nothing I can do about it." because the idea of organizing is so foreign to them that it's not even considered. That's an oppressive society.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 150 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Finally? This has been known for years, wtf???

[–] PixellatedDave@feddit.uk 27 points 2 days ago

Yeah as soon as I saw the photo I said that's old hat lol

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Necrifyre@piefed.blahaj.zone 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

At this rate, what hasn't Trump done? The guy breathes criminal activity, walks with intention of breaking something and everything he touches will turn to rigor mortis.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] KeavesSharpi@lemmy.ml 45 points 2 days ago (4 children)

It wasn't because he's in them 30,000 times? I thought it was because he was in them 30,000 times, and also an adjudicated rapist. There's other reasons they don't want to talk about him being a proven racist? Weird.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 73 points 3 days ago (1 children)

As if the 10.000 (or more) blacked out mentions of trump in the files weren't evidence of his abundant participation...
Why is this all worded so carefully?

No mention ofcourse of how trump's pageant-business was used for and complicit in epstein's crimes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SpaghettiMaster@feddit.uk 56 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Didn't we already know all this?

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 46 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Democrats are a bit like Internet Explorer. Slow, painfully behind, only listening to the people's demands when a court orders it to, constantly forcing itself on you when you don't want it, and sometimes it's all you got.

[–] MouldyCat@feddit.uk 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

you forget one - owned by corporate interests

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Until they are all punished, this is pointless.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 63 points 3 days ago

Wow. What a bombshell that noone has known for the better part of a decade. A revelation, truly

[–] nastronot@lemmy.zip 47 points 2 days ago (1 children)

EUREKA! What an EPIPHANY! We finally know after all this time. Can you believe it?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AZEngie@lemmy.zip 31 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I'm so glad this is in the news again. The MSM hasn't been doing enough of this!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Chozo@fedia.io 51 points 3 days ago (4 children)

We finally know why the ocean is so wet: It's full of water.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 47 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This was known after the FBI investigated in 2006. Alexander Acosta, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida made a deal with Epstein in 2007 to bury it. This was under Bush. Since then Acosta has gone on to work in the Trump administration. Whatever happens to Trump, Acosta needs to be brought up on charges for using his office to let a mass pedophile ring off the hook. Someone needs to look at his decision making and then try him and put him in prison where he belongs. We've known all about Epstein for 20 years now and very little has been done. But now theres a long list of co-conspirators and they need to be prosecuted.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

US culture revolves around the thrill of gossip. It's not about the thing itself. It's about high stakes drama.

It's like the Mythbusters gif where the truck never hits the bollard.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›