this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2026
1161 points (99.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

12330 readers
1067 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
1161
Could, but won't (media.piefed.zip)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by inari@piefed.zip to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mordred_85@lemmy.world 117 points 4 days ago

It could already be like this…..

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 96 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Three-day work week and one-income family... for the Bezos family, anyway.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

You're giving him credit for 3 more days per week than he works

[–] brem@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

At critical social mass, humans have the ability to create their own orbit.

As if chucks of space dirt, the gravitationaly weak become mass for the masshole.

Classlisly gasly, the husks of once individuals become encapsulated not by strength or wisdom, but through social influence

[–] CalypsoGirl@lemmy.today 41 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Bear in mind this man is toying with the idea of running for president in 2028, and he would treat USA citizens the way he's been treating his Amazon employees. DO NOT VOTE FOR THIS MAN.

[–] ImminentOrbit@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Unfortunately, the people that need to hear this aren't here.

[–] forbiddencherry@lemmy.today 27 points 4 days ago (1 children)

AI has allowed many people a 0-day workweek already.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tango@piefed.ca 18 points 3 days ago

Anyone who believes Bezos clearly doesn't understand how capitalism works. AI will allow rich people who already own the companies to increase productivity with fewer employees. Meaning, they will gain more money and have less reason to spend it. Without a drastically higher wealth tax which funds social programs, how are the working (read: redundant) class going to GET access to money? With what jobs?

Let me ask you this: back in more chauvinistic times, a family was expected to subsist entirely on a single salary: the husband's. Since women's lib doubled the workforce, have families become more or less able to afford necessities like housing? The economy doesn't adjust to make things easier for people. If the average household income doubles, households don't become more able to afford things. Prices just go up.

The people who already possess resources like property aren't gonna suddenly stop asking have-not newcomers for as much money as they can squeeze out of them. There's absolutely no aspect of capitalism that will ever lead to that outcome.

So if rich people who own businesses can make those businesses function with fewer employees, then they're not gonna just say "hey guys, I'm gonna pay you the same wages for only working 3 days, doubling my workforce and the amount I have to pay it". There's no reason for them to do so. None. Poor people will, instead, go jobless and be allowed to slowly die of any of many poverty-related causes.

Rich people only tolerate poor people because they need so many of us to do things for them. That's about to change.

[–] Furbag@pawb.social 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

When I was a kid, computers were just starting to turn from primitive to sophisticated. The business world looked at the new computer age and immediately said "This technology will usher in a new era of productivity where we can have shorter and fewer working days per week!"

And they were right. Sort of.

The new era of productivity was on the horizon, but the promised benefits for the working class never materialized.

Businesses are never incentivized to pass the savings of increased productivity on to the employees. In fact, any business that voluntarily chooses to do so out of the goodness of their own hearts and a desire to provide for their workers would likely be out-competed by other companies vying for the same market share who chose not to do so. That's not a bug, that's a feature of capitalism.

Mark my words, as someone who has lived through the broken promise of "technology will free us from the shackles of labor!" once before; AI is not going to give you a 3 day workweek or put any extra money in your paycheck (unless you are part of the grift itself). It's more likely to give you a 0 day workweek when your corporate masters find a way to eliminate you, you squeaky cog.

And if you think I'm wrong, that's fine, but just remember what I said when your company posts a 300% increase in productivity, a 200% increase in revenue and record-shattering profits, but when it comes time for your performance review you get a 0.5% cost of living raise, a request for you to take on more responsibility now that you have agentic AI automating much of your job, and a pat on the back for your hard work.

If you get anything from the coming AI revolution, it won't be because your bosses decide to give it to you. It will be because you took it for yourself by political force or physical force.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Sure, it could.

... and Bezos could double the pay of thousands of his employees for life and still make more than all of them combined.

But he won't

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

We already had one income families, and then capitalism stole it from us.

Now that women are part of the workforce, we need a 20 hour minimum workweek (with the same weekly minimum wage) to restore the workers rights we had 100 years ago.

[–] NotEasyBeingGreen@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago

Not quite 100 years, depending on where you are talking about.

In the USA the 40 hour work week became federal law in 1938. In the Netherlands it wasn't until the mid-1970s when it became normal.

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 16 points 4 days ago

Another of these bastards desperately trying to convince us AI is something good and something we need, fuck off!

[–] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Even if it did, Bezos would lobby against the laws needed to establish it.

[–] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Just a couple more tricks, then we're on our island babe.

[–] brem@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

....for just 5 trillion more dollars, we can develop a surgery to make jeff's eyes be the same size.

An extra .002 Bitcoin can give Jeff a name that isn't close to Jeffrey.

[–] brem@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Edit: for a fun game, try finding real pictures of his eyes from 10+ years ago.

He used to look like a singular spectacled testicle with perpetual pink eye.

[–] Waterpumpee@lemmus.org 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is the problem with unchecked capitalism. We had so many tech advances nobody should have to work more than 1hr per day anymore.

Now a person lives in suboptimal conditions and think why not work 2hrs to get a bigger flat. This person competes against all 1hr slackers and wins. Now another person comes along and grinds 3hrs and wins. The whole thing spirales up until living conditions are unbearable and you cant earn more.

Whats true: AI increases efficiency. Whats not true: efficiency gains will be handed through to the workers.

The advances we had since the 70's are crazy. Yet we went from single income to double income while not having enough for a home, children. So history speaks a different language than bezos.

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 9 points 4 days ago (5 children)

AI does not increase efficiency in any way that I've seen

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago

It has opened up possibilities for me. Got several save editors made, a 2006 game that now runs and controls well on modern Windows, and it is recompiling a Windows v3.1 game to run natively on modern computers. Also can be used to translate games, and it made a plugin.

Considering that this is with an experimental local AI model, I think the proper release would push things a step further.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 13 points 4 days ago

The word "could" taking on the role of Atlas.

[–] Jyrdano@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Whats with his face and neck? He looks like roided up turkey.

[–] Elting@piefed.social 5 points 4 days ago

Think he got jaw implants or something.

[–] quink@lemmy.ml 13 points 4 days ago (2 children)

No no trickle down economics works, just give me more tax breaks it'll come warm and salty.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Axolotl_cpp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 days ago

Erm, we could already do this without AI :/

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

For him and the other CEOs.

[–] NotEasyBeingGreen@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago

Capitalists earn money by having money, not working.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 days ago

ohh no no no, 3 day work weeks are coming.

Everyone works and is paid the minimum wage for 24 hours a week.

"One income family" makes sense when he thinks of everyone working at Amazon as family.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 days ago

I could surgically attach wings and start to shit glitter.
I won't, but I could. It's more possible than anything Jeff Bozos just said.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

Nah. He's just looking for an excuse to dock your pay by 40%

[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 days ago

Yes but not for YOU.

[–] toxicbubble@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

man who destabilized small businesses around the world suddenly interested in helping working class

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Single income was normal two generations ago. It was taken from us because of greed.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

In the past it was more because of competition. It's not that companies started offering less, they just stopped increasing what they would offer, and still got the people they wanted. Because there is always someone more desperate.

More recently it's been greed. It shows up as sustained high profit margins you'll see primarily in tech companies. Outside of the tech industry the only issue is how long the market or government takes to correct it. Politics around the oil industry being an example.

That would require either a massive unified movement of the people to fight for workers' rights and wealth redistribution, massive scaled and well designed goverment regulation, or employers to willingly decide to demand less of their employees and pay them more... by definition, a billionaire is incapable of saying "no... that's enough return on my investment". There is no way that they will willingly pay out more than they need to for anything, least of all for part time human labor.

[–] XenoChiller@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago

Fuck that guy 🖕

[–] CascadianGiraffe@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nationalize Amazon, Walmart and these other giant 'too big to fail' corporations. Then use those profits to fund UBI. If America wants to be a capitalist country, let's just make it one that actually works for all of the citizens.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

we're not capitalist, we're corporatists. which is what Mussolini thought fascism should be called, as he saw fascism as the merging of corporations and the state.

[–] notso@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago

Sure it will. The question is just for whom...

[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Why does he look so roided up and red.

Divorce and mid life crisis hits hard I guess.

Honestly half of these billionaires are of mid life crisis age so that explains a lot.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Sometimes I'll get all miserable about something and it sort of helps seeing the richest folk in the world melt down.

All the money in the world can't help.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 5 points 4 days ago

Families being squeezed for more money pushes both adults into the workforce. Well if both work they can afford more rent, if they can afford more rent then the house is worth more to a landlord and the price goes up and up. Banks profit, landlords profit. You get fucked.

Even if you buy instead of rent, the banks are making more than ever on the higher interest that result from high housing costs.

Neither of these contribute anything of benefit to society. They don't build roads or improve the local community. Yet they benefit from the work of others who do by increasing the amount they take even more!

[–] Sir_Premiumhengst@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Please make his head explode.

Disclaimer: peacefully hope for his already red head to become even more redder. Maybe some more pronounced veins. Heck, if one of them popped that'd be fine by me, too.

[–] LePoisson@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is Lemmy. You can say you hope a suicide drone blows up in his face on camera and we get to watch his head turn into pink mist.

[–] Sir_Premiumhengst@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

🙏 Dear Luigi,...

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 3 days ago

Yes, but think what they can do in 7 days weeks with 3 income households.

load more comments
view more: next ›