cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/shit/p/1452786/target
These are the memes that make me wonder how many people understand that the meme is about hiring someone to rape someone else.
this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2026
78 points (86.1% liked)
Lemmy Shitpost
42237 readers
4182 users here now
Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.
Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means:
-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
1.Memes
10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)
Reach out to
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Not necessarily, far too many unknowns to state that for certain. Certainly unethical, illegal/rape would depend.
Ok, could you describe a situation in which it wouldn't be? Just 1. And i will agree with you.
But with 1 condition: it can't be "the ex bf understands that the person has a std and agrees to have unprotected sex".
'Agrees to have sex' is all that is needed. Not disclosing std is abhorrent and illegal, but it's not rape per se.
I believe it depends on where in the world you are. If I recall a lot places do quality that as sexual assault and rape.
It might qualify as rape by deception. When you consent to something, especially sex, it's under certain circumstances. If you consent to sex with a condom, then the partner surreptitiously removes it, that's rape by deception. I think it's a fair expectation that someone would disclose std status if they knew about it.
E.g. in germany, it would viewed correctly as rape.
The gender of the infected person isn't specified, in UK law, a woman doesn't commit rape even if she forces someone to have sex at gunpoint. Other crimes would be committed but not rape.
I know its common to hear women can't commit rape but I am not 100% on what using your hands counts as so that might be a possibility. IIRC rape law is over penetrating someone else.
So you don't argue that it isn't rape but just, that it is not legally rape in the UK.
Just as a sidenote, It would be legally rape in e.g. germany.
But I give you the point, because of the hand thing. While the conversation is probably not about doing something with their hand. But maybe the person has aids and is just supposed to inject their blood into the victims veins. Then it is not rape. Still a disgusting act of violence but no rape.
Well unethical either way, just not guaranteed to be rape in the eyes of the law. Probably other crimes instead.
I also wonder that, because even if assuming if it was consentual, no sane person would have sex without protection.
Edit: accidentally posted as separate comment, instead of reply.
Well it wouldn't be consensual if she would not disclose a known std to her partner when engaging in unprotected sex.
For the same reason, "stealthing" is rape. Or "surprise analsex" is rape. Any deviation from what was consented to, is rape, especially if the intention was to misguided the victim.
You assume it's a her, but it could go both ways
Fair. My bad.
This is what i mean. It is okay for people to have unptotected sex, but only if both people consent to it, and if they understand the risks of stds and pregnancy. This is why unprotected sex without understanding those risks is rape, even if people did consent.