this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2026
213 points (97.3% liked)

politics

31182 readers
2464 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TwodogsFighting 89 points 1 week ago (5 children)

arguing the FBI “did not want to punish victims of bestiality”

Makes sense. There's a donkey in charge of the FBI.

[–] Blibly@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

And a shit flinging ape in the white house

[–] cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 week ago

That horse snuck up on Mr. Hands and did that to him without his consent.

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 6 points 1 week ago

Well, at least he looks surprised. Not like he could stop though.

Like many things, he didn't think that through. Is he hiring non-humans now?

[–] cheers_queers@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 week ago

i know you're joking but not all victims of beastiality are animals. in case anyone else was wondering

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I didn't realize Republicans were serious when they were concern trolling that allowing gay people to be married would be like them marrying their dog because love is love. Turns out they just wanted to fuck dogs. Kinda unsurprising in hindsight.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

It's always projection with them.

[–] ProIsh@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hey look, everyone, it's Prolsh the Bridge Builder!

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Prolsh the Bridge Builder.

Certainly not Prolsh the Goat Fucker.

(google "but you fuck one goat" to find the joke this subthread is playing with)

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

sometimes it's more fun to give other people the punchline :3

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah, gotcha. Sorry, my punchline to give it a new spin was assuming he was the goat fucker but pretending to know him as the bridge builder. lol

I didn't catch what you were doing. BTW, I'm an upvote for you, not your downvote. Silly Lemmy. I know points don't matter, but it's irritating anyway. lol

Silly Lemmy [. I know] points

yes silly lemmy points

[–] boobookittyfrick@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Did someone say goat?

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

While Patel characterized the change as nondiscriminatory toward victims, Durbin refuted the notion and claimed it was a way to protect those who engaged in bestiality.

“You dropped automatic disqualification for applicants who have been engaged in bestiality, not victims of bestiality, applicants who have engaged,” Durbin said to Patel.

[–] IHeartBadCode@fedia.io 13 points 1 week ago

Right? There's a legal distinction here and if the hiring people weren't aware of that distinction then, that's on the HR.

Someone who has engaged is VERY DIFFERENT than someone who is a victim of.

And you know, they're kind of a law agency related thing, the FBI is... Ya know?! Like the FBI does law stuff... Just. I don't have words here. It's like five year olds running the place or something and actually that feels insulting to five year olds.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Which, even if the wording was wrong and that was the intent... were they turning away that many people? What is going on out there?

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

For the prostitution I could see that, but on the beastiality side... there's some questions

[–] moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sex work is not a crime.

Bestiality is a crime. Every time.

[–] Uranus_Hz@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

“What’s the problem? It’s my puppy”

[–] arak@lemmy.today 16 points 1 week ago

The Epstein class gets weirder. No fucking wonder the onion is boring, irl is more unbelievable

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So when i was in college i went to an on-campus FBI recruitment dinner because of the nice, free food. They did their whole song and dance, and at the very end, they said something like,

"Alright you college kids, we know this is behind the times, but drugs are illegal, and if you've smoked pot in the last 3 years or psychedelics in the last 10 years, we can't hire you, so start cleaning up your act now so we can hire you because we desperately need people with computer skills."

It was amazing how the mood changed in the room, many people immediately became disinterested, and they could tell.

Did the FBI ever relax their policy on weed?

Edit: looks like they changed weed to one year, but psychedelics are still 10 years. https://fbijobs.gov/sites/default/files/2025-02/guide_eligibility.pdf

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

A new low. Every day it seems more impossible, but every day a new low.

Humiliating and offensive to all Americans in my opinion.

"No universal healthcare, minimum wage of $7.25, and now our federal agents can fuck dogs" GOOD JOB

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

Routine 2026 headline.

[–] mister_flibble@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

"It's called interspecies erotica fucko"

[–] akmur@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

must have a convicted friend who needs that change to get in

I think the other countries might be laughing at us

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

FBI is hiring animals now?

[–] SailorFuzz@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

just pigs, mostly.

[–] normalentrance@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They also removed prostitution and theft. I wonder if they included beastiality to draw attention from the other two? That's the only scenario where there is some plausible reason to include that in my mind.

Or they have a really shifty guy that fucked a dog or something and they need him for some reason.

They also might just be trying to distract from Don Jrs Russian oligarch funded wedding.

So many options. All bad.

[–] Uranus_Hz@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If shooting puppies isn’t a disqualifier then why should fucking them be?

[–] normalentrance@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

I guess it depends if you are a gentle lover.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

The real victims were the animal fuckers we tried avoiding along the way.

[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Imagine a FBI agent coming to your home for an “investigation,” just because a dog or a cat lives with you.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

are there a lot of dog fuckers apply for FBI jobs? surely "relaxing" that criteria won't be the employment boost he hopes it will be ?

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 6 days ago

He straight up admitted this was not his idea

So there's at least one well connected sheep fucker trying to get in

[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Did anyone ask him about couch fuckers? Seems like a logical follow up.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Googly-eyed Kremlin bitch goatblower

[–] UpAndAtThem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Calling it now, his mama was a Llama.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Have you seen his eyes? Clearly a pug

[–] UpAndAtThem@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)
[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 5 days ago

Yeah, but look how his lower face also protrudes... It's like an itty bitty snout

[–] FluidBeef@quokk.au 1 points 1 week ago

Hey, they have high testosterone levels!