this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2026
326 points (97.7% liked)

News

39010 readers
1615 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

OpenAI said it's ending its contract with Cursor, a coding startup recently acquired by SpaceX, because it doesn't trust an Elon Musk-owned company to comply with its terms of service.

The company said in a statement published on Friday night that it plans to shut off Cursor's access to OpenAI models on November 12.

OpenAI did not accuse Cursor of violating any terms. It instead pointed to past conduct by another Musk-owned company, Twitter, which Musk bought in 2022 and merged with SpaceX earlier in February.

top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ironpangolin29@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago

Guess he found out being violated doesn't feel nice. (A jab at his apparent molestation of his little sister)

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Yesss eat each other

[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Haha I had a cursor rep reach out to me last week with a pitch around their bright future now they're part of SpaceX.

I replied and told him that in no uncertain terms would I do business with any business that directly benefits a known fascist like Elon Musk.

[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

I got hit up by a recruiter this week about a job with some startup trying to build data centers in the ocean and Peter theil is a major investor. I'm not looking for a job but going to tell them they have a dumb idea funded by an asshole sounds like a good time.

[–] Yewb@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

I also told them no thanks because of the association

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 115 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

When you're such a toxic leader that other toxic companies won't do business with yours

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He was such a toxic piece of shit, that the other pedophiles wouldn't even invite him to their pedo island, even after he begged.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 24 points 1 day ago

Elon did go to Epstein's pedo parties though. Please don't propagate the myth that he didn't, it only serves Elon himself.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

Constantly fucking vendors and partners over is why Musk remains the darling of investors. Capitalism is broken.

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago

When you’re such a toxic leader that other toxic companies won’t do business with yours

...you are becoming the richest one alive in ~~Toxicityland~~ the USA

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Really really don't say this often but Sam Altman has a point here.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 2 points 13 hours ago

I mean, you know, infinite monkeys with broken clocks or something like that. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 53 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Twitter, which Musk bought in 2022 and merged with SpaceX earlier in February.

Hold on a second, SpaceX owns X/Twitter??

I thought Elon owned that privately, but the fact that he parasitised his monetary black hole of a purchase onto his most successful company really just shows how fucking stupid Musk actually is.

Though I really shouldn't be surprised as his other monetary black hole venture, xAI, is also parasitised onto SpaceX.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Yes he used the infinite money glitch to let the ~~investors~~ suckers pay for xitter

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago

SpaceX is now backstopped by the US taxpayer. It’s just a giant corrupt grift.

[–] ratel@mander.xyz 68 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Basically everything he owns has been merged into SpaceX this year which was to make everything look profitable or something, I don't pretend to understand this part of finance.

Twitter/X, xAI/Grok and Cursor are now all part of SpaceX under the SpaceXAI subsidiary.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceXAI

[–] Tiral@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (3 children)

No, you're right. He has A LOT of failed or failing projects no one talks about, like The Hyperloop.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 day ago

The Hyperloop completely succeeded at exactly what it was meant to do: delay the California High Speed Rail project for a couple of years to maybe sell a few more Tesla cars.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Hyperloop is when I realized he was a fraud.

The concept has existed for a century, it is old news, it has never worked, it can never work.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I recently re-read his "paper" on that, and it looks so much dumber now than it did at the time.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

I remember watching a weird German guy and his Chinese(?) girlfriend making a video response to a Thunderf00t video about the Hyperloop, and it was like they were in a cult, they kept referring to "The Whitepaper" like it was holy scripture, and could not be wrong, despite evidence to the contrary.

TF is annoying and has gone overboard several times, but his Hyperloop videos are on point.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 day ago

Boring Company

[–] BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't pretend to understand this part of finance.

A lot of people access potential profits based upon revenue numbers. So when Musk wraps everything under Starlink, he can inflate the revenue numbers. Still show an overall profitability, and then the PR goes. Starlink's profit margins will increase by 5% points next year. Which sounds and is impressive, but the overall revenue numbers shown by SpaceX covers a lot of other products.

It basically aims to fool people doing a surface level analysis

[–] cinoreus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not only that, the reasoning to merge space X with x AI and X is to label space X as an AI company, and thus should have valuation of one.

This always strikes me as odd because, given the AI race, the future value of each company is basically infinity or zero.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I just want to point out how ugly is uninspired is the new logo. The old one was supposed to represent the space launches, the new one is like if someone gave the spacex and the anthropic logo to grok and asked a merge

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He has Twitter wrapped up in xAI, which is wrapped up in Space X. Basically buried 3 levels down. It’s not profitable and it’s well hated, so he’s trying to insulate it with companies with more investment / contracts and less public hate.

Whilst doing nothing to address why it's so hated.

[–] galacticworm@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

Isn’t his future massive pay day based on a spacex valuation?

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

parasitised his monetary black hole of a purchase onto his most successful company really just shows how fucking stupid Musk actually is.

I hate that SpaceX and Twitter are one company now, but I think it was smart of the nazi saluting asshole to wrap the turd that is the husk of Twitter in the otherwise forward progress SpaceX company.

No one (other than other grifters) would be interested in buying into today's Twitter, but wrapped in SpaceX, lots bought in.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago

He wanted it to be forced as a purchase for all the index funds and passive investors. He knows he couldn’t sell it to willing investors.

[–] UnLocoPoco@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

The infighting and imminent downfall of AI clapping companies is so satisfying to watch

[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh man he bought Cursor I missed that. Boo.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yes shortly after the IPO, and I think they spend 80% of the money they got from the IPO buying Cursor.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

60 billion in stock, if I recall correctly. I don't believe they got any cash

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

So they too got screwed. 🤡

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They paid most of that with fake money tied to SpaceX stocks. Still a golden parachute to the founders

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

They got an insane amount of money for a VSCode fork with AI integrations baked in

I used it for a bit because it was cheaper than directly buying a Claude subscription from Anthropic. Canceled the moment SpaceX bought it

[–] patruelis@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (4 children)

What's a good alternative to cursor?

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 1 day ago

your brain and a text editor

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

VSCode with your preferred AI integrations. Buy the monthly subscription directly from OpenAI or Anthropic

That's all Cursor is anyway. VSCode + integrations + subscription bundled together

[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago

Anna's Archive.

[–] TrumpetX@programming.dev 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Cursor's biggest advantage is that it has all the code context loaded right up there in the embedded VSCode editor fork. Augment Code has a similar "context engine" built up, but it's not a full blown editor.

Cursor's latest plans were bringing it into something closer to what Claude Code or Claude Desktop is doing (Codex has similar tools.) I'm personally ditching it all and doing VSCodium in 1 window and OpenCode on a terminal. After using Cursor for a year (personal projects, not at work), I can say that it was good, but Composer 1 and 2 were absolute shit and I relied on GPT and Claude models. OpenCode + OpenCode Go (GLM, etc) offer a much more affordable alternative.

[–] patruelis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago
[–] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

My heart goes out to them.