this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2026
346 points (97.5% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

47313 readers
1958 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, but attribution is not required in any way. No links to Reddit in post body


-If you would like to provide a source link, do so in the comments but not in the post body.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Im willing to bet most people do not look at the price tag before buying it. Same with soda, chips, etc. Maybe they don't even look at the register. They just swipe their card, same as always.

[–] jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This follows my conspiracy theory that grocery stores in areas with high SNAP benefits ussge increase the prices on everything significantly. I have some family in an area where a lot of people rely on SNAP, and spent $20 on a pack of five hot dogs.

[–] CalypsoGirl@lemmy.today 3 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

But I don't understand how this candy is SNAP eligible. Last year SNAP began banning snacks & sweets & junk food.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Old photo maybe?

[–] jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev 1 points 11 hours ago

I think eligibility varies state to state

[–] BarnWolf@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's junk food, not fancy nice food. It's bad for you, full stop. Nobody is going to pay that price for junk food. This also goes for fast food that now thinks it's some luxury food, it's not, it's still junk. For God sakes, stop giving these soulless,oney sucking corporations your money. It's that simple. This bs stops when the money stops.

[–] CalypsoGirl@lemmy.today 2 points 12 hours ago

The corporations setting prices are all in cahoots to put all the fat poor fucks on a diet, or criminalizing them if the people resort to stealing the overpriced junk food they're addicted to.

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Seriously, for that price you could eat real foodlike substances, perhaps even something that was in the ground more recently than it was in a factory.

Gotta disagree with the "no one will pay for it" part of your comment though. People can't get enough of anything that's bad for them! Most of them will sit there in their micro plastic shedding clothes, not getting exercise, under a UV light, smoking a cigarette while drinking alcohol and downing Tylenol and Advil by the bottle, while blasting their eyeballs with blue light and huffing VOCs before they ever touch a raddish.

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

No, it doesn't. They influence the FDA and it's "generally as safe" stuff.

[–] yenahmik@lemmy.world 121 points 2 days ago (36 children)

Most junk food in the US has gone off the rails in terms of price. Like seriously, don't spend money on food that has zero nutritional value and is actively harmful to your health. You'll feel so much better and your bank account will be so much bigger.

I guess I have corporate America to thank for no longer buying chips, candy, or baked goods that I might've otherwise splurged on as a treat. Can't justify it with prices the way they are.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I was with you, up until baked goods. What's wrong with baked goods? A nice loaf of bread freshly baked from a bakery? Or maybe a baked potato with cheese and bacon? Or maybe a big bag of pot.........wait, sorry. Wrong kind of baked.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (8 children)

😋
I think baked goods as a treat would be cakes or cookies.
Also from what I hear in USA bread is generally of very poor quality, but probably better from a baker.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Mass produced, store bought bread is trash, but you can also find some of the nest quality bread you'll ever taste if you go to specialty bakers insteadof supermarkets. I live in Wyoming and I can buy breads made with heirloom grains that are actually highly nutritious. The same applies to cookies, etc. Remember, the USA is a major producer of grains. We grow grain of exceptional quality. We just don't sell it to our own people at a discount. We export the good stuff for profit and eat the low quality high yield stuff.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tmyakal@infosec.pub 16 points 2 days ago

Even red meat. I've basically given up on beef and pork because it's so expensive. Just tofu or poultry these days.

load more comments (34 replies)
[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Funny how they say it's 120 calories per 1/8th of the pack 🙄 Yeah guys, that's how people eat candy bars.

1/8th at a time.

The online nutrition information for a king size is similar, in that it says 150 calories for 1/3 of the bar. So the individual one is about 450 calories, while 2 of them is 960, 60 calories more than it should be.

Or I'm reading the fine print on the packaging wrong, in which case it says 120 calories per 1/6th of the pack, which would bring it out to 720 calories, or, two bars smaller than the "king size," which seems deceptive, considering the packaging says it's a "super king 2 bars."

Just deceptive marketing and shrinkflation, all wrapped up in one shitty package!

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.ca 65 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wow they really do make it hard to find the "And I raped kids" version

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 47 points 2 days ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

a king sized snickers costs 3 bucks.

this candy bar is a deal compared to that, lol.

edit: I'm wrong, that says 2 Bars on the edge, not 2 pounds (why is lbs short for pounds anyway?!)

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lbs is a shortened version of the Greek word for measuring scales. So it actually doesn‘t mean a specific weight, but more like “weighed” or something.

[–] pipes@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

While true that originally it also meant "balance" (in late latin we later got the word bilanx for scales - literally two plates), lb is for latin libra, and it was an actual specific weight (with a corresponding economical value in the Roman as coin) in use since the Roman republic, and it has remained in use for more than two millennia all over the world (with slighly different values depending on time and place, but usually between 350-450grams). It's not an accident the the UK pound stirling coin still has the same L shaped symbol £, same as the italian lira, etc

[–] thatGuyWithGlasses@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pound in other languages is "libra", as is weight scale ...

[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How ironic that Americans use a foreign language to describe their unit of measurement that is used nowhere outside the USA.

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 0 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

It’s literally used in the UK, where it fucking came from.

[–] Sustolic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I am so glad I am not the only one who thought that this was a 2 pound bar..

[–] PissMissile@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Don't buy it?

[–] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 days ago (3 children)

At least it's snap eligible

[–] Salamanderwizard@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Ya...and you can only get snap if you work 80 hrs a week, have written consent from your boss, your past 4 bosses, the blood of a tainted saint, the pubes of a dead god, the hymen of a virgin, And 3 hearts from a slain dragon.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ol_capt_joe@piefed.social 17 points 2 days ago

But if you break it in half, you'll have 2 bars, and that's like 50% off! Break it again, 50+50 that's 100% off! Why stop there?! Trump did say he was gonna cut prices by 700%.

Promises made, Americans wept 🙃

[–] Magister@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

Canadian here, I remember years ago going to the US, we were at par for money, and a candy bar in the US was like $1 or $2. So the $2 chocolate bar was $2 for us too.

Now this US$6.49 is basically CA$10, it is insane!

load more comments
view more: next ›