this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2026
775 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

88162 readers
2700 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The country needs to find a “compromise” between privacy and safety, according to Flock Safety CEO Garrett Langley.

“When people talk about just one of these, privacy or safety, they’re prioritizing the wrong thing, and what we have to prioritize as a country is compromise,” Langley said during a recent interview with Fox News. “How do we have our safety, and how do we balance privacy?”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 331 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

There should be no compromising our right to privacy and these cameras need to go. Fuck Flock and their cash grab.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 85 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

Fuck Flock, Axon, and the entire rest of the surveillance state, both government and private.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cabbage@piefed.social 23 points 4 weeks ago

Also as illustrated again and again, from ICE hunting down good people to cops stalking women because they are pigs, surveillance is not safety. It's rather the opposite. I want privacy so that I can remain safe.

I don't think anyone who ever lived in a totalitarian regime would describe it post fact as having made them safer.

[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 243 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

How about we compromise by saying remove them all, give back the money spent, delete all data and in exchange you don't get the treatments due one helping enable orwillian levels of suvelance

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 118 points 4 weeks ago (19 children)

Yup, the compromise is not sending him to Tennessee to be publically hanged.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 126 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

Interesting that he’s framing it as a balance between privacy and safety instead of privacy and security.

Flock cameras haven’t been proven to make anyone safer.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 78 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

If anything they actively make people unsafe by falsely flagging drivers with a partial tag match for a stolen vehicle

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 31 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

They’ve proven that police are just dumb as fuck.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HeartyOfGlass@piefed.social 95 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I like the sounds of this. Here's an offer:

Fuck off, and the guillotine gets put away.

Everybody wins!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] downdaemon@lemmy.ml 69 points 4 weeks ago

The compromise is that he lives

[–] comador@lemmy.world 57 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 54 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

It's wild, because when I was a kid, there was this huge conservative talking point about how trading freedom for security was bad.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 29 points 4 weeks ago

Conservatives are all about freedom until there's profit involved.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 48 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

And the zombies said "all we want to do is eat your brains, maybe we can compromise..."

[–] ThillyGooth@lemmy.world 24 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

"We're not unreasonable; I mean, no one's gonna eat your eyes"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 48 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I think the window of compromise has long since passed. Flock as a company went in with a guns blazing, anti-privacy, record everything, give the information to anyone style business style, and then chose to double and triple down on the style when the controversy/outcry first started. Once you've hit the stage where there's people starting to protest and riot and cities have started to go out of their way to ban the product and retract contracts due to the fact that they're concerned about public support. It's too late. That's a fire that's not being put out.

[–] KeithD@lemmy.nz 22 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I propose they compromise by going out of business after deleting all data and removing their cameras from everywhere.

[–] goatinspace@feddit.org 47 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 45 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Compromise: Quit now, and keep your head.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 44 points 3 weeks ago

Compromise offer: you stop spying on us and we'll stop breaking your cameras.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 42 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

There is absolutely no reason to track people everywhere they go. We were fine before these things.

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yup, violent crime has been dropping for decades and not an insignificant drop. We did not need mass surveillance, we did not want mass surveillance, nor do we want it now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

The more you learn about Flock, the scarier it gets. They have FULL profiles built on EVERY american that has flock cameras nearby. All your shopping, driving, financial habits are tracked. They know who all your friends and family are and how often you visit, they track your vehicles specific identifiable features like bumper damage, stickers, faded paint, etc. All of that is a complete violation of the 4th amendment and all these companies need to be sued.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 40 points 4 weeks ago
[–] abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone 40 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

If you get rid of your right to privacy, you get rid of your right to safety.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] _lilith@lemmy.world 38 points 4 weeks ago

Fuck off with compromise. take your shit and get out no one wants you in case the guillotine wasn't fucking clear

[–] Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org 38 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Remember, it's Axon as well, and many more companies. and a major contrbuter who has linked in with all of these creepy services is Amazon and has the largest surveillence network in residential areas not just on travel corridors comprised of Ring doorbell cameras tied in to all of these systems.

Flock seems like the sacrificial lamb, to me. They are in your face, ther cameras are obvious, and their CEO runs his mouth so much everyone hates him.

It's like how Elon can't keep his mouth shut, but Ellison far more dangerous and nearly as rich.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

Here's my compromise: we give the Flock CEO twenty to life instead of sentencing him to public flaying like he deserves.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ToastedCoconuts@piefed.blahaj.zone 34 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Safety for who, exactly, Garrett? Because the common people aren't safer with this overreach

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] desuwu@piefed.blahaj.zone 33 points 4 weeks ago

No, Garrett, we don't negotiate with surveillance states.

[–] Zomg@piefed.world 32 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

For his part, Langley has said that state regulators should “pass bills that make [the illegal use of Flock data] a criminal offense.”

No one trusts the police to genuinely enforce anything that could impact themselves.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ElChinchilla@lemmy.world 31 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I can guarantee this has been said already, but the compromise is simple; no flock cameras (or comparable tech) anywhere.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 21 points 3 weeks ago

Corporate CEOs can all have 1 camera each, on their front lawn, for them to hang from.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 29 points 4 weeks ago

Okay, here’s the compromise: you close everything down, and we don’t feed you to a hungry business of ferrets.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 29 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

We're already in the safest time for petty crime ever, and flock won't help with America's real issue of corporate crime. Safety will not be affected.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] scroll_responsibly@lemmy.sdf.org 28 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

Anyone who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserves neither.

Garrett can get fucked.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FluorideMind@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago

The compromise is you scrap every camera, or we do.

[–] green_goglin@thelemmy.club 26 points 4 weeks ago

Eat shit, Garrett.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 26 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (3 children)

Fuck these clowns. Their “compromise” is finding some way to quiet the bad press while continuing to do what they’ve been doing.

“We’ll stop putting our cameras where people don’t want them and just put then where our clients want them.”

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 25 points 4 weeks ago

*We didn't invent police abuse! We actually shined a light on it and pointed it out"

Fuck right the hell off with this shit. You don't get to sell your panopticon to a group that routinely abuses every tool they have, and feign ignorance in defense of the results.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 3 weeks ago

Compromise dez nuts

Fucking fascist.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 24 points 4 weeks ago

Okay, here's the compromise: disband your company and we'll put away the guillotines.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago

Here is your compromise. Shutter your company & we won't hang you.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 23 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I call a guillotine a compromise.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 22 points 4 weeks ago

He says as he continues to launch surveillance drones without asking anybody if they're okay with that...

[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 22 points 4 weeks ago (7 children)

Tar and feathers are not expensive, and it's a hilarious thing to do to someone

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 22 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Hey won't be gullitined and instead he will just face prison time and have his mass survelence system dismantled and the rest of his assets seized and redistributed

A fair and just compromise imho

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 21 points 4 weeks ago
load more comments
view more: next ›